A request for sex determination at the ANC visit
Meena, a 24-year-old woman, G3 P2 L2, comes to your HWC with her husband and mother-in-law for her first ANC visit at 10 weeks. After the examination, the husband asks you to tell him the sex of the baby. When you refuse, he says a private clinic nearby does it for money and asks for a referral. The mother-in-law says they already have two daughters and cannot afford a third. Meena is silent and looks at the floor. The HWC has no ultrasound machine. The husband places two 500-rupee notes on the table. The ASHA is outside the room. The couple has a Janani Suraksha Yojana card. You are the only trained provider present and the next patient is waiting.
1. What is your legal and ethical response to the request and the money? Explain what you would say and do.
Read the worked answer
Sex determination is prohibited in India under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994, as amended. I cannot disclose the sex of the fetus, cannot refer the couple anywhere for that purpose, and cannot accept money for it. The HWC has no ultrasound, but that is not the only issue: even suggesting a place where sex determination could be done would be aiding a prohibited act.
I would return the money politely but firmly and say clearly that it is illegal to determine or reveal the sex of a baby, and that I will not refer them for it. I would not moralise or shame them, because that may drive them away from ANC care. I would explain that the law applies to clinics and doctors as well, and that asking for sex determination puts the pregnancy care at risk.
I would keep the ANC consultation focused on Meena's health: her haemoglobin, nutrition, danger signs, and the next visit. I would not discuss the request in front of other patients, and I would not disclose it to neighbours or relatives. The reasoning is that the legal duty is absolute, but the way it is handled determines whether Meena continues to come for care.
2. How would you respond to the family pressure on Meena while respecting her confidentiality and safety?
Read the worked answer
Meena is silent and looking at the floor, which may mean she is afraid, ashamed, or under pressure. I would try to speak with her alone, at least briefly, using a respectful opening such as asking whether she has any worries she wants to discuss privately. I would not ask her to condemn her husband or mother-in-law in front of them.
In the private conversation, I would screen gently for pressure, threats, or violence. If she says she is being forced to seek sex determination or to terminate a pregnancy because of the sex, I would take it seriously, document it, and involve the Medical Officer and appropriate support services. I would not promise complete secrecy if there is a risk to her safety, but I would explain what I must share and why.
With the family, I would acknowledge their financial worry without accepting the request. I could discuss legitimate support: ANC care, JSY benefits, nutrition, and the value of all children. I would not offer a guarantee or a workaround. The ASHA can follow up at home, but I would brief her not to become part of the pressure.
The reasoning is that the ethical duty is to protect Meena's autonomy and safety, not merely to refuse a request. A refusal without support may leave her alone with the family pressure.
3. What would you document, and what would you do if the family says a private clinic is already doing sex determination?
Read the worked answer
I would document the ANC findings and the advice given in Meena's record in factual, non-judgemental language. I would note that the family requested sex determination, that I explained the legal prohibition, that money was offered and returned, and that no referral was given. I would keep this record confidential and not write it in a place visible to other patients.
If the family says a private clinic is doing sex determination, I would not confront the clinic myself or send the family there to test the claim. I would inform the Medical Officer and the district Appropriate Authority under the PC-PNDT Act, giving the information I have. I would avoid repeating the allegation as fact; I would report what was said and by whom. I would also continue to provide ANC care to Meena without punishing her for the family's request.
The reasoning is that the law creates a reporting mechanism for suspected violations, but the CHO's role is to report through the proper channel, not to investigate or negotiate. Documentation protects Meena, the HWC, and the integrity of the ANC service.