UPMSP High School Art (Drawing) study materials
UPMSP High School Art (Drawing) study resources

UPMSP High School Art (Drawing): Traditional and Folk Art of India

UPMSP High School Art (Drawing) · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Traditional and Folk Art of India

This domain tests the identification of folk and traditional traditions by state, material, subject and visual grammar, and the ability to describe a motif accurately rather than vaguely praising it.

Traditions to recognize

  • Madhubani (Mithila, Bihar): double-line outlines, dense filling so no space is left empty, natural dyes, themes such as the kohbar marriage chamber, fish, lotus, peacock, Radha-Krishna; traditionally painted by women on walls and paper.
  • Warli (Maharashtra, Thane and Palghar region): white rice paste on a brown cow-dung ground; geometry of circle, triangle and square; figures made of two triangles; the tarpa dance and the square chauk.
  • Gond (Madhya Pradesh): dots and fine lines filling animal and tree forms; associated with Jangarh Singh Shyam.
  • Pattachitra (Odisha, Raghurajpur): cloth-based scrolls, Jagannath themes, natural colours, sharp profiles.
  • Kalamkari (Andhra Pradesh): pen-work at Srikalahasti and block printing at Machilipatnam, vegetable dyes with iron and myrobalan.
  • Phad (Rajasthan): long cloth scrolls of Pabuji, painted by the Joshi family of Shahpura.
  • Kalighat (Kolkata, 19th century): quick watercolour on paper made for temple pilgrims.
  • Tanjore (Thanjavur): gesso relief and gold foil on wooden panels.

Worked example

Telling Warli from Madhubani. Both are wall-rooted traditions, but Warli uses a single white pigment on a mud-brown ground, builds figures from triangles, and fills the field with ritual squares and dancing chains. Madhubani uses several flat colours, outlines every form with a double line, and fills the interior with fine hatching and pattern. The reasoning: identify by ground, pigment and figure grammar first, then by subject.

Traps

Naming the wrong state, treating the 19th-century Kalighat style as ancient, calling every scroll a Phad, and confusing Warli geometry with Madhubani ornament.