UPMSP Vocational Retail Trading study materials
UPMSP Vocational Retail Trading study resources

Short by ₹2,300 at Closing

UPMSP Vocational Retail Trading · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Short by ₹2,300 at Closing

It is 9:40 p.m. at a small electronics and accessories store in Lucknow. The POS day-end report shows cash sales of ₹48,700, card sales of ₹31,200 and UPI collections of ₹12,450. The cashier counts ₹46,400 in the drawer, a shortfall of ₹2,300 against the expected cash. During the evening rush, the cashier allowed a colleague from the mobile-repair counter to use her logged-in POS session to bill two customers because the queue was long. One of those bills was a ₹1,499 return of a power bank; the customer had no receipt, and the colleague gave cash from the drawer. The cashier also remembers giving change for a ₹2,000 note but is not sure whether the customer's ₹899 bill was entered. The card settlement batch report shows one transaction of ₹3,499 marked 'void' at 7:12 p.m., but the customer's signed copy says 'paid'. The store closes in 20 minutes and the owner wants the day's deposit prepared.

1. Calculate the expected cash, the unexplained difference, and list which items must be investigated before the deposit is sealed. Show how the ₹1,499 refund and possible unrecorded ₹899 sale affect the arithmetic.

Read the worked answer

Starting position: expected cash per POS = ₹48,700; drawer = ₹46,400; apparent shortfall = ₹2,300.

This is not final because the report may not include every cash movement.

  1. ₹1,499 no-receipt refund: if it was processed as a return in the same POS day, the ₹48,700 should already be net of it, and the ₹2,300 shortfall remains the starting point. If it was paid from the drawer but not recorded, expected cash = ₹48,700 − ₹1,499 = ₹47,201, and the shortfall = ₹801.
  2. Possible unentered ₹899 cash sale: if the customer paid cash and the bill was not entered, expected cash = ₹48,700 + ₹899 = ₹49,599, and the shortfall = ₹3,199. If the ₹1,499 refund was also unrecorded, expected cash = ₹48,700 − ₹1,499 + ₹899 = ₹48,100, so the shortfall = ₹1,700.
  3. Card void of ₹3,499: this does not explain a cash shortfall. It affects card settlement. Check with the acquirer whether the customer was charged. If the signed copy says paid but the batch says void, either the void was not completed or the copy belongs to another transaction. Do not treat the card batch as final until matched.
  4. Also check: opening float, petty cash, change given from the drawer, and any cash paid out for the refund.

Conclusion: report a range with open items, not a single proven theft. The most likely mix is an unrecorded refund plus one or two unentered cash bills; the card void is a separate reconciliation issue.

2. Decide whether to seal the deposit, and draft the actions for the next 24 hours, including how to treat the colleague and the no-receipt refund.

Read the worked answer

Deposit decision: do not seal the deposit as final until there is a blind recount and a written list of open items. You may seal the counted ₹46,400 in a tamper-evident bag with two signatures, record the ₹2,300 variance, and deposit only after the owner or manager authorises. Do not top up the drawer from petty cash or another till. Hold the card batch until the ₹3,499 void is matched; if the customer was charged, refund through the gateway, not cash. Match UPI ₹12,450 to the gateway report.

Next 24 hours

  • Pull the POS audit log for the colleague's session and the refund; preserve CCTV for 7:12 p.m. and the refund time.
  • Take separate written statements from both staff, fact-finding and not accusatory.
  • Contact the power-bank customer: explain the no-receipt refund policy; if the refund was outside policy, offer exchange or store credit, or recover cash only after manager approval. Do not confiscate the product.
  • Contact the card customer if the void is wrong; correct it through the acquirer.
  • Document the reconciliation. If evidence shows misappropriation, follow the owner's disciplinary policy and, if needed, a police complaint.
  • Retrain on shared logins and no-receipt refunds.

3. Recommend three POS controls to prevent recurrence in a two-counter store with shared login IDs.

Read the worked answer
  1. Unique cashier IDs and no shared sessions. Every bill, refund and void must be traceable to the person logged in. A colleague may not bill under another cashier's ID; if help is needed, open a second till or call a supervisor.
  2. Supervisor authorisation for exceptions. Refunds without a receipt, voids, price overrides and cash payouts require a supervisor's own ID and a short reason code. The supervisor checks the product and records customer ID or phone number. The ₹1,499 refund would then have been stopped or documented.
  3. Daily independent reconciliation. At close, a second person does a blind count (without seeing the expected figure), both sign, and the card/UPI batches are matched to the POS. Any variance above a set limit (for example ₹100) is investigated before deposit. Keep the till count sheet and audit log for at least the store's record period.

Supporting actions: train staff on the refund policy, display it at the counter, and review exception reports weekly. These controls are low-cost and fit a two-counter store without full-time security.