WBBSE Madhyamik Telecom (Vocational) study materials
WBBSE Madhyamik Telecom (Vocational) study resources

Cable Operator Evaluating a Broadband Franchise

WBBSE Madhyamik Telecom (Vocational) · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Cable Operator Evaluating a Broadband Franchise

A cable TV operator with 150 homes in a small town wants to become an authorised broadband franchisee of a national ISP. The terms are: one-time franchise fee ₹1,00,000; refundable bank guarantee ₹50,000; equipment (OLT card, switches, routers, splicing kit) ₹3,00,000; committed monthly bandwidth of 100 Mbps at ₹30,000. His own monthly costs would be staff ₹12,000, electricity ₹3,000, rent ₹4,000 and maintenance ₹1,000. He plans to sell 4 Mbps plans at ₹500 a month, starting with 40% of his existing cable homes in the first three months and adding about 15 customers a month after that. Capacity is 200 connections. He has ₹2,50,000 in savings and would borrow the rest at 14% interest. A national operator already sells 30 Mbps at ₹499 in the same town.

1. Calculate monthly fixed cost and break-even subscriber count. Is the plan financially viable on these numbers? Show the arithmetic.

Read the worked answer

Monthly fixed cost = bandwidth 30,000 + staff 12,000 + electricity 3,000 + rent 4,000 + maintenance 1,000 = ₹50,000.

Because every cost here is fixed, each subscriber contributes the full ₹500: Break-even = 50,000 ÷ 500 = 100 subscribers.

Capital to be recovered = franchise fee 1,00,000 + equipment 3,00,000 = ₹4,00,000. The ₹50,000 bank guarantee is refundable, so treat it as blocked cash, not a cost. Borrowing ₹1,50,000 at 14% adds about ₹1,750 a month in interest.

Customer ramp: 40% of 150 = 60 by month 3, then +15 a month. So month 4 = 75, month 5 = 90, month 6 = 105 - break-even around month 6. At the 200-connection cap, revenue is ₹1,00,000 and monthly surplus is about ₹50,000 before interest. Recovering ₹4,00,000 at that rate takes roughly 20–22 months from start, allowing for the early loss-making months.

Verdict: the arithmetic works but the margin is thin. Break-even at 100 of a 200 cap leaves only 2× headroom, and the plan depends on hitting the ramp exactly.

2. Identify the three assumptions most likely to break this plan, with the numerical impact of each.

Read the worked answer
  1. Demand at his price. He sells 4 Mbps at ₹500 while a national operator sells 30 Mbps at ₹499. That is not a competitive product; customers may take his service only where the national operator's coverage is poor. If conversion is 20% instead of 40%, he starts at 30 customers, not 60, and break-even slips by roughly four months. If churn is 2% a month at 150 subscribers, that is 3 lost customers a month against 15 additions - painful, and worse at higher churn.
  2. Bandwidth commitment. 100 Mbps committed for 200 subscribers at 4 Mbps is heavily oversubscribed on paper. If busy-hour demand forces an upgrade to 200 Mbps at, say, ₹52,000, fixed cost becomes ₹72,000 and break-even rises to 144 subscribers - close to the cap. Peak utilisation data is essential before signing.
  3. Cash and finance. He has ₹2,50,000 against ₹4,00,000 of non-refundable capital plus ₹50,000 blocked as bank guarantee, so he must borrow ₹1,50,000–₹2,00,000. The 14% interest, plus the bank guarantee being called if he exits early, plus the franchise fee being non-refundable, means a failed ramp leaves him with debt and no asset value. A fourth risk is regulatory: he must operate under the ISP's authorisation and cannot resell bandwidth independently.

Each of these shifts break-even upward or delays the ramp; they do not merely add 'risk' in the abstract.

3. Recommend go or no-go, with conditions. What would you advise him to change before signing?

Read the worked answer

Recommendation: conditional go, not go on these terms.

The break-even of 100 subscribers against a 200 cap is achievable only if the ramp holds, and the ₹500-for-4 Mbps product is not defensible against 30 Mbps at ₹499. Before signing he should:

  • Renegotiate the product: ask the ISP for higher-speed plans (at least 20–30 Mbps) or a lower wholesale bandwidth commitment for the first six months, so fixed cost starts near ₹35,000–₹40,000 and break-even falls to 70–80 subscribers.
  • Get busy-hour demand data from the ISP and a written upgrade price, not a verbal estimate.
  • Reduce the capital outlay: lease or rent the splicing kit and routers rather than buying, and keep at least three months of fixed cost (₹1,50,000) as working capital after the equipment spend.
  • Sign only with a written exit clause on the bank guarantee and clarity on who owns the customer relationship.
  • Line up a local differentiator: same-day fault repair, bundled cable TV, community Wi-Fi - service quality, not speed per rupee.

No-go if the ISP refuses higher-speed plans, refuses an upgrade price in writing, or insists on the full franchise fee before any subscriber is connected.