Cousin Marriages and a Quiet Request in a Purulia Village
A student surveys 40 households in a village in Purulia for a Class XII project. The genealogies show 11 marriages between a man and his mother's brother's daughter and 4 between a man and his father's sister's daughter. Yet in 12 households, elders insist that such marriages are 'not our custom' and that a proper bride comes from another village. The household schedule also records 6 couples living in the wife's natal home after marriage, although the stated rule is that a bride moves to her husband's village. One woman, separated for two years and back in her natal home, asks the student not to write her case in the notebook because 'people will talk'. The student has one afternoon left, no recorder, and a teacher who wants a clean table of 'marriage types' with percentages.
1. Using the figures, how should the student describe the marriage and residence patterns, and what should the student avoid saying?
Read the worked answer
Description should follow the evidence, not the textbook labels.
- Marriage: 15 of 40 marriages (37.5%) are between cousins - 11 with the mother's brother's daughter and 4 with the father's sister's daughter. Both are cross-cousin forms, so the data suggest a preferential pattern, not a compulsory rule; 25 households do not follow it.
- Residence: 6 couples are currently uxorilocal and 34 are virilocal or patrilocal at the time of survey. But 'living in the wife's natal home' may be temporary - house construction, care of a parent, or a husband's work - so record duration and reason before calling it a residence rule.
- Avoid: calling the village a 'cross-cousin marriage system'; treating 37.5% as a village rate from a small, non-random sample; labelling the separated woman as 'divorced' without knowing the customary status; and forcing every household into one of four boxes.
A defensible sentence is: 'Fifteen of forty recorded marriages were between cousins, and six couples were uxorilocal at the time of survey.' The percentages belong in a table with N = 40 stated.
2. How can the student explain the gap between the elders' statement that cousin marriage is 'not our custom' and the 15 recorded cases?
Read the worked answer
Anthropology expects a gap between ideal norms and actual practice; the task is to explain it, not to decide who is lying.
Possible explanations to test:
- Scope of the rule: cousin marriage may be allowed only in certain clans, hamlets or families, while elders state the general ideal of village exogamy.
- Change over time: the practice may be declining because of education, migration or marriage payments, so elders describe what is now proper rather than what happened 30 years ago.
- Land and affinity: cousin marriage keeps land or strengthens ties between related households; elders may disapprove in principle while accepting it in practice.
- Question effect: a general opinion question ('Is it your custom?') invites a normative answer; a genealogy question ('Who did your son marry?') produces practice.
The student should ask about the last three generations, who arranged each marriage, and whether the couple were in the same clan. Then report both statements side by side: 'Elders describe village exogamy as proper, yet 15 recorded marriages are between cousins.' That is a finding, not a contradiction to hide.
3. The separated woman asks that her case not be recorded. What should the student do, and how does the decision affect the analysis?
Read the worked answer
Her request takes priority over the completeness of the table.
- Respect the withdrawal: explain that she can withdraw, that no name or identifying detail will be written, and that the request will not be reported to her family.
- Offer options: omit the case entirely, or include it only in an aggregate category with no name, hamlet or kin detail. Do not publish anything she can be identified from.
- Do not bargain: confidentiality should not be traded for an interview.
- Record the limitation: note in the methods section that one case was withheld at the respondent's request. This is honest and does not invalidate the survey.
- Consider the bias: if several separated women refuse, the project will undercount separation; say so rather than presenting the table as complete.
The teacher's demand for a clean table does not override consent. If the teacher insists, the student can present the aggregate table and add a footnote on the withheld case.