WBCHSE HS English (Second Language - ENGB) study materials
WBCHSE HS English (Second Language - ENGB) study resources

WBCHSE HS English (Second Language - ENGB): Prescribed Prose: Character, Narrative Technique and Critical Judgement

WBCHSE HS English (Second Language - ENGB) · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Prescribed Prose: Character, Narrative Technique and Critical Judgement

Questions on your prescribed prose pieces ask you to explain what a text does and how it does it: a character's function, the significance of an incident, the title, the narrative voice, or a critical judgement. The WBCHSE English B prose set includes, among others, Ruskin Bond's 'The Eyes Have It', A.P.J. Abdul Kalam's 'Strong Roots' and Tolstoy's parabolic stories.

What to prepare per text

  • Narrative voice: first-person irony in Bond; autobiographical recollection in Kalam, where the speaker's adult judgement colours childhood memory.
  • Structure: where the turning point falls and what it changes.
  • Character function: what a minor figure exists to reveal.
  • Theme stated as a claim, not a topic: not 'blindness' but 'blindness exposes how much of love is performance'.
  • Two or three short quotations you can deploy accurately.

Worked example

Question: How does the ending of 'The Eyes Have It' create irony? Reasoning: the narrator hides his blindness, constructs a courtship on a train, and is pleased with his own performance; a new passenger then reveals that the girl is completely blind. The reader's assumptions and the narrator's self-image collapse together. Answer structure: (1) name the irony - situational and dramatic; (2) cite the evidence - the concealment, the flirtation, the final disclosure; (3) state the effect - the narrator's cleverness becomes absurd, and the story quietly questions whether anyone truly perceives another person.

Traps

  • Retelling the plot instead of answering.
  • Ignoring the focus word: 'irony', 'contrast', 'significance of the title'.
  • Unsupported judgement: 'It is a very touching story' earns nothing.
  • Confusing narrator with author.
  • Quoting inaccurately; a misquoted line undercuts an otherwise good answer.