HR Wants Coaching Notes Before a Talent Review
An internal coach at a 600-person software company has completed three of six contracted sessions with a senior sales manager, R. R self-referred after a skipped promotion, and the coaching agreement states that attendance and a brief progress summary will be shared with HR. In session 3, R discloses marital strain and says, 'If my director finds out I'm struggling at home, I'm finished.' The next day, HR emails: the VP wants a written summary of R's 'attitude and commitment' before a talent review, plus the coach's recommendation on whether R should lead a key account. The coach's own manager says, 'Coaching is part of performance management now-just give them what they need.' The coach has not documented a confidentiality clause beyond the HR summary line, has no signed consent for the VP request, and has a supervision session in two days.
1. What should the coach disclose to HR and the VP, and what must happen before any response?
Read the worked answer
Conclusion: Disclose only what the contract and informed consent permit; do not provide R's personal disclosure, an attitude assessment, or a promotion recommendation. Reasoning: The signed agreement authorizes attendance and a brief progress summary, not session content or evaluative judgments. R's marital strain is sensitive personal information; sharing it could cause foreseeable harm and would breach confidentiality. The IAC Code of Ethics expects clear agreements, confidentiality, and avoidance of conflicts of interest. The coach also has a dual-role risk: internal coach and performance-management agent. Action: Acknowledge HR's request promptly, state that the coach will respond after confirming consent, and meet R to explain the request in plain language. Ask R what, if anything, may be shared, in writing. Offer a minimal factual summary limited to attendance and agreed coaching goals, or aggregate themes only if R consents. If HR compels disclosure, disclose only the minimum legally required, tell R beforehand where possible, document the decision, and seek supervision or legal advice. Do not promise secrecy the coach cannot keep. What to avoid: sending notes, forwarding emails, giving verbal impressions, or letting the manager's pressure override the agreement.
2. How should the coach answer the VP's request for a recommendation on R leading a key account?
Read the worked answer
Conclusion: Decline to make the recommendation. Reasoning: A recommendation is an evaluative judgment about readiness and performance, which is outside the coaching role and conflicts with the trust relationship. The VP is asking the coach to convert confidential coaching into a talent-review input. Even if the coach has relevant observations, the client has not consented, and the power dynamics make consent suspect. The IAC ethics framework calls for avoiding conflicts of interest and clarifying who the client is. Action: Tell HR and the VP that the coach can support R in preparing evidence for the talent review but cannot rate or recommend R. Offer a separate, transparent process: R decides what evidence to submit, or the organization uses a qualified assessor with a distinct contract and R's informed consent. If the organization insists on using coaching for evaluation, the coach should renegotiate the role, document the change, and consider ending the coaching. What to avoid: giving a verbal 'off the record' impression, ranking R against peers, or pretending the recommendation is merely administrative.
3. What changes are needed to the coaching agreement, and what if HR will not agree?
Read the worked answer
Conclusion: Replace the vague HR summary line with a three-way agreement that names the client, sponsor, purpose, confidentiality limits, records, reporting, and termination. Reasoning: Ambiguity is the root problem. R did not knowingly consent to evaluative reporting, and HR may assume it has more access than it does. A clear agreement protects R, the coach, and the organization. It should state that coaching is voluntary and distinct from performance management; that session content and personal disclosures are confidential; that only agreed attendance and goal-progress information will be shared; that notes belong to the coach and are kept securely; and that the sponsor may receive aggregate themes only with R's written consent. Action: Draft the agreement, review it with R and HR, and get signatures before more sessions. If HR refuses to limit reporting, tell R and HR that the coaching cannot continue under those conditions. Offer a referral to an external coach or a separate performance-management process. Document the decision and consult supervision. What to avoid: continuing informally while hoping the issue resolves, or letting HR's payment create an implied right to all information.