Right iliac fossa pain at 24 weeks of pregnancy with a non-visualised appendix
A 29-year-old woman, gravida 1 para 0, is 24 weeks pregnant. She presents at 02:00 with 18 hours of periumbilical pain that has migrated to the right lower quadrant, anorexia and one episode of vomiting. Temperature 38.3 °C, pulse 104/min, blood pressure 112/70 mmHg. The uterus is appropriate for dates; tenderness is maximal at McBurney's point with guarding. White cell count 14.8 x 10^9/L, C-reactive protein 62 mg/L. Urinalysis shows no nitrites and 1+ protein. A targeted ultrasound by an experienced sonographer shows a normal-appearing right kidney with mild pelvicalyceal dilatation, no free fluid, and the appendix is not visualised; the gravid uterus obscures the right iliac fossa. The MRI scanner is available but the on-call radiographer is not trained in the obstetric protocol after midnight, and the surgical registrar wants to operate within 6 hours.
1. How do you interpret the ultrasound, and what is your next imaging step?
Read the worked answer
The ultrasound is indeterminate, not negative. Failure to visualise the appendix in a pregnant patient is common - the caecum is displaced cephalad by the gravid uterus and bowel gas and the fetus limit the acoustic window. The mild right hydronephrosis is a physiological finding of pregnancy in most cases and does not explain guarding and fever.
Next step: MRI of the abdomen and pelvis without gadolinium.
- MRI has sensitivity and specificity above 90% for appendicitis in pregnancy and is the recommended second-line test when ultrasound is non-diagnostic (ACR Appropriateness Criteria; ACOG and ACR guidance).
- It avoids ionising radiation entirely and also identifies alternative diagnoses - ureteric calculus, ovarian torsion, degenerating fibroid, preterm labour.
- It should be done urgently, not electively: the value falls if surgery is delayed pending a 9 am slot.
If MRI is genuinely unavailable within a few hours and the clinical picture is evolving, a low-dose CT is acceptable, because the fetal dose from an abdominal CT is on the order of a few tens of milligrays - well below the threshold for deterministic effects, with only a very small stochastic risk. Untreated perforated appendicitis is far more dangerous to mother and fetus than the scan.
2. If MRI is chosen, specify the protocol and discuss whether gadolinium should be given.
Read the worked answer
Protocol (1.5 T preferred, no oral or intravenous contrast, no bowel preparation):
- Coronal and axial T2-weighted single-shot fast spin echo (HASTE/SSFSE) of the abdomen and pelvis - fluid-sensitive, motion-robust, no breath-hold needed.
- Axial and coronal T1-weighted gradient echo (in- and out-of-phase if available), which shows the appendix as a blind-ending tubular structure and highlights haemorrhage or proteinaceous fluid.
- Axial fat-suppressed T2 (or STIR) to look for periappendiceal fat stranding and free fluid.
- Diffusion-weighted imaging (b = 0, 400, 800) with ADC - restricted diffusion in an inflamed appendix increases confidence and is quick to add.
- Limit the field to the region of interest; keep the examination under about 30 minutes and use feed-and-warm/positioning rather than sedation.
Gadolinium: avoid unless the diagnosis cannot be made without it. Gadolinium crosses the placenta, and although no teratogenic effect has been shown in humans, the safety data are limited; ACR guidance is to use it in pregnancy only when it will materially change management. A non-contrast study is almost always sufficient for appendicitis. If a abscess or alternative diagnosis genuinely requires contrast, discuss with the obstetric team and document the decision.
3. MRI cannot be performed for 10 hours and the patient now has worsening pain and rebound tenderness. What are your options?
Read the worked answer
This is now a clinical, not a radiological, emergency. Increasing pain with rebound tenderness in a pregnant patient with fever and leucocytosis is a surgical indication irrespective of imaging. The differential includes perforated appendicitis, which carries high fetal loss and maternal morbidity if left.
Options, in order of preference:
- Proceed to diagnostic laparoscopy without further imaging, with the surgical and obstetric teams agreeing pre-operatively. Laparoscopy is safe in pregnancy at 24 weeks with open (Hasson) entry and low insufflation pressure; the risk of a negative appendicectomy is outweighed by the risk of perforation.
- Low-dose CT abdomen/pelvis if the surgical team is genuinely undecided and a scan can be obtained faster than theatre. Justify it explicitly: fetal dose is small, the stochastic risk is negligible compared with untreated perforation, and CT also excludes calculous disease and abscess.
- Transfer to a centre with 24-hour MRI only if the patient is stable and transfer time is short; a 10-hour wait is not acceptable.
Do not simply observe and repeat the ultrasound. Document the multidisciplinary discussion, including the radiation and surgical risk counselling given to the patient.