The River That Was Our Shade
In a Class 10 Bangla class the teacher gives an unseen passage and three questions. The passage reads: “গ্রামের পাশে ছোট একটি নদী ছিল। এক সময় নদীটি বছরের সব ঋতুতেই ভরা থাকত, আর গ্রামের লোকেরা নৌকা করে হাটে যেত। গত দশ বছরে নদীর দুই পাশে অনেক ইটভাটা গড়ে উঠেছে। ইট পোড়ানোর ধোঁয়ায় গাছপালা কমে গেছে, আর নদীর পানি শুকিয়ে এখন তার বুকে বালু জমেছে। বৃদ্ধ করিম মিয়া বলেন, ‘নদী আমাদের ছায়া ছিল; আজ সেই ছায়া কেবল স্মৃতিতে।’” Two students disagree about the last sentence. Rubel says Karim Mia means the shade of the trees beside the river; Meem says he means the river's shelter and comfort. The teacher rules that the answer must be proved from the other sentences rather than from personal opinion, that the disputed word must be explained in both its literal and figurative senses, and that no information from outside the passage may be used. The class has 20 minutes and no dictionaries.
1. Which student's reading is better supported by the passage? Justify your answer with quotations, and state honestly what evidence favours the other reading.
Read the worked answer
Meem's reading is better supported, on three grounds taken from the passage itself.
First, the grammar of the sentence assigns the shade to the river, not to the trees: “নদী আমাদের ছায়া ছিল”, not “নদীর পাশের গাছ আমাদের ছায়া ছিল”. Second, the earlier sentences show what the river actually gave - “নৌকা করে হাটে যেত”, a route and a means of livelihood - which fits shelter and comfort rather than a patch of shadow. Third, “আজ সেই ছায়া কেবল স্মৃতিতে” treats the shade as something lost and now only remembered, i.e. a way of life, not a physical object that could simply be pointed at.
Rubel's case is not empty, and a good answer should say so: the passage does mention “গাছপালা কমে গেছে”, so tree cover genuinely declined. But that sentence explains an effect of the brick kilns; it does not make trees the subject of Karim Mia's remark. The literal reading survives only if we ignore the sentence structure, which is why it loses.
2. Rewrite the last sentence in plain Bangla with no figurative meaning, and name the figure of speech used in the original.
Read the worked answer
A plain version: “নদী আমাদের আশ্রয় ও উপকার করত; এখন নদীটি শুধু স্মৃতিতে আছে।” This says the same thing without borrowing an image: the river gave shelter and benefit, and now only the memory remains.
The original word “ছায়া” literally means shade - the cool darkness under a tree or a roof. In “নদী আমাদের ছায়া ছিল” it carries a transferred meaning: protection, relief, a place to rest. Because the quality of shade is transferred to the river without any comparison word such as “মতো” or “পরি”, the expression works as a রূপক (metaphor) rather than an উপমা (simile). A simile would have read “নদী আমাদের ছায়ার মতো ছিল”, which is visibly weaker here, because a simile compares two things while a metaphor lets the river simply be the shade. The plain rewrite loses that force, which is exactly why the original is written the way it is.
3. The teacher notes that past and present tense stand side by side in the passage. Decide whether this is a fault or a strength, and support your decision from the verbs used.
Read the worked answer
It is a strength, not a fault, because the tense shift is doing the passage's main work.
The opening uses the past: “ছিল”, “থাকত”, “যেত” - a completed state and a repeated habit. From the third sentence the verbs turn to the present perfect: “গড়ে উঠেছে”, “কমে গেছে”, “জমেছে” - changes begun in the past and still true now. The final reporting verb “বলেন” is present, placing Karim Mia's lament in the reader's own time.
That pattern maps exactly onto the content: what the river was is finished, what the brick kilns have done continues. A single consistent past tense would flatten the contrast and make the loss sound like ancient history rather than an ongoing process.
The passage is not flawless in this respect - “ছিল” (simple past) and “থাকত” (habitual past) sit in adjacent sentences, so a reader could ask for consistency - but that variation is small and idiomatic, describing a state and then a habit within it. The major shift from past to present perfect is deliberate and should be pointed out as a model of tense used for meaning, not merely checked for correctness.