FE-1 Law of Contract study plan
FE-1 Law of Contract · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Law of Contract
Map the whole syllabus of contract law into a one-page topic tree covering formation, consideration, intention, capacity, terms, vitiating factors, discharge, and remedies
Explain in writing the elements of a valid offer and a valid acceptance, distinguishing offer from invitation to treat with three worked examples
Draft a comparison table separating unilateral and bilateral contracts and identify which exam scenarios typically signal each
Complete 20 multiple-choice questions on formation and log every wrong answer with the precise rule that was missed
Your checkpoint
A one-page syllabus topic tree plus a formation error log of at least 20 answered questions with corrected rule statements
Law of Contract
Apply the rules on consideration and promissory estoppel to five short hypotheticals and write the outcome with reasons
Distinguish intention to create legal relations in commercial versus domestic settings and justify each conclusion by reference to the presumption used
State the rules on certainty of terms and agreements to negotiate, and apply them to three problem scenarios
Answer 25 mixed questions on consideration and intention under timed conditions and review every miss
Your checkpoint
Five written hypothetical answers of 150-250 words each, marked against a self-made checklist of required rule elements
Law of Contract
Classify contract terms into conditions, warranties, and innominate terms and predict the remedy available for breach of each
Apply the parol evidence rule and the rules on incorporation of terms to four problem questions
Explain the statutory and common law controls on exclusion clauses and test them against three unfair-terms scenarios
Build a decision flowchart for exclusion clause challenges from incorporation through construction to statutory unreasonableness
Your checkpoint
A one-page exclusion clause decision flowchart plus four worked problem answers applying it
Law of Contract
Distinguish misrepresentation from breach of term and from mistake, and state the remedies available for each type of misrepresentation
Analyse duress, undue influence, and unconscionable bargains in three scenarios and identify which vitiating factor fits best
Apply the rules on illegality and restraint of trade to two problem questions and explain the effect on enforceability
Complete a 40-question timed mock covering weeks 1 to 4 and record the score by sub-topic
Your checkpoint
A timed 40-question mock with a scored breakdown by sub-topic and a list of the three weakest areas
Law of Contract
Apply the rules on discharge by performance, agreement, breach, and frustration to five scenarios and state the consequences of each
Explain the distinction between anticipatory breach and repudiatory breach and identify when the innocent party may terminate
State the test for remoteness of damage and apply it to three chains of causation
Draft a summary of the measure of damages for breach of contract including mitigation and liquidated damages
Your checkpoint
A discharge and remedies summary sheet of no more than two pages covering frustration, breach, remoteness, and the measure of damages
Law of Contract
Apply the remedies of specific performance, injunction, rescission, and restitution to four problem scenarios and justify why damages would or would not suffice
Explain the rules on penalties and forfeiture and test them against two clause drafts
Practise issue-spotting on three long-form problem questions and write full answers under time pressure
Review the week 4 mock error list and close at least 80 percent of the identified gaps
Your checkpoint
Three full problem-question answers written under timed conditions with a self-marked score against a model answer structure
Law of Contract
Sit two full-length timed practice papers under exam conditions and record raw scores
Categorise every error from both papers by cause: unknown rule, misread fact pattern, or application error
Re-teach the three weakest sub-topics by writing a one-page explainer for each from memory
Memorise and reproduce the key case names and the proposition each stands for across all sub-topics
Your checkpoint
Two completed timed papers with an error-cause analysis table and three from-memory explainer pages
Law of Contract
Consolidate all sub-topics into a single revision sheet limited to four pages
Complete 60 rapid-fire questions across the whole syllabus and target a score above 80 percent
Rehearse the exam technique for problem questions: identify the issue, state the rule, apply the facts, and conclude
Simulate one final full paper under strict timing and review only the errors flagged as high frequency
Your checkpoint
A four-page consolidated revision sheet, a 60-question rapid-fire score above 80 percent, and one final timed paper with a short error review
Milestones
Week 2: Score at least 70 percent on a self-set 25-question formation and consideration quiz, and be able to state the offer and acceptance rules from memory without notes
Week 4: Score at least 65 percent on the 40-question timed mock covering weeks 1 to 4 and produce a written list of the three weakest sub-topics with a fix plan for each
Week 6: Complete three timed problem answers and self-mark at least 60 percent against a model structure, with all remedies correctly identified
Week 8: Score at least 80 percent on the 60-question rapid-fire set and complete the final timed paper within the allotted time with a four-page revision sheet finished