ISACA AAIR key terms
ISACA AAIR · Get comfortable with the vocabulary.
- AI governance framework
- Related: AI policy, three lines model, AI risk appetite
A documented structure of policies, roles, decision rights, and oversight mechanisms that directs how an organization develops, deploys, and monitors AI systems to meet its objectives and obligations.
- AI policy
- Related: AI governance framework, acceptable use policy, AI steering committee
A formal statement approved by senior leadership that sets mandatory rules and expectations for acceptable AI use, accountability, and escalation across the enterprise.
- AI steering committee
- Related: AI governance framework, AI risk owner, accountability
A cross-functional executive body that prioritizes AI initiatives, resolves escalated risks, allocates resources, and holds owners accountable for AI outcomes.
- three lines model
- Related: AI governance framework, internal audit, AI risk owner
A governance structure separating management ownership of risk (first line), independent risk and compliance oversight (second line), and independent assurance (third line).
- accountability
- Related: AI risk owner, AI steering committee, human oversight
The obligation of a named person or role to answer for AI decisions, outcomes, and control effectiveness, including to regulators and affected parties.
- AI risk appetite
- Related: risk tolerance, AI governance framework, AI use case inventory
The amount and type of AI-related risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives, expressed as qualitative statements or quantitative tolerances.
- risk tolerance
- Related: AI risk appetite, risk threshold, key risk indicator
The specific, measurable boundaries within an approved risk appetite, such as maximum error rates or loss thresholds, used to judge whether a given AI risk is acceptable.
- AI use case inventory
- Related: AI risk appetite, model inventory, AI risk assessment
A maintained register of all AI systems and initiatives in the organization, capturing purpose, owner, data, model type, and risk rating to enable oversight.
- AI ethics principles
- Related: fairness, explainability, human oversight
Stated organizational commitments such as fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, and human well-being that guide AI decisions beyond legal minimums.
- human oversight
- Related: human in the loop, automation bias, accountability
Deliberate human involvement in AI operation, ranging from monitoring to approving or overriding outputs, proportionate to the risk and impact of the system.
- human in the loop
- Related: human oversight, automation bias, AI risk assessment
A control design in which a qualified person reviews and confirms or rejects an AI output before it produces a consequential effect.
- automation bias
- Related: human in the loop, human oversight, model risk
The human tendency to over-trust automated output and accept it without adequate scrutiny, weakening the effectiveness of human review controls.
- transparency
- Related: explainability, AI disclosure, AI ethics principles
The degree to which AI purpose, data use, logic, limitations, and decision impacts are disclosed clearly to stakeholders, including customers and regulators.
- explainability
- Related: transparency, model interpretability, AI disclosure
The ability to describe how an AI model produced a specific output in terms a human reviewer, auditor, or affected person can understand and act on.
- model interpretability
- Related: explainability, black box model, model documentation
A property of a model whose internal logic is inherently understandable to humans, such as simple decision trees or linear models, as opposed to opaque deep networks.
- AI disclosure
- Related: transparency, explainability, AI ethics principles
Communication to users or affected parties that AI is being used and, where required, what it does, what data it uses, and how to seek recourse.
- fairness
- Related: bias, disparate impact, AI ethics principles
The condition in which an AI system does not produce unjustified differential outcomes across groups, assessed against defined metrics and protected attributes.
- bias
- Related: fairness, training data bias, disparate impact
Systematic error or skew in AI data, design, or use that produces unfair or inaccurate outcomes for particular groups or contexts.
- disparate impact
- Related: fairness, bias, AI risk assessment
A measurable difference in AI outcomes between demographic groups that may indicate discrimination even without intent to discriminate.
- acceptable use policy
- Related: AI policy, shadow AI, data leakage
Rules defining which AI tools, data, and use cases are permitted or prohibited for employees, including restrictions on confidential data in public models.
- shadow AI
- Related: acceptable use policy, AI use case inventory, data leakage
AI tools or services used within an organization without governance approval or visibility, creating unmanaged data, legal, and model risks.
- AI risk assessment
- Related: AI risk register, risk threshold, AI impact assessment
A structured evaluation of the likelihood and impact of harms from a specific AI system, including affected stakeholders, data, and control gaps.
- AI impact assessment
- Related: AI risk assessment, human oversight, fairness
A documented review of how an AI system affects individuals, groups, and society, typically covering rights, safety, fairness, and privacy before deployment.
- AI risk register
- Related: AI risk assessment, key risk indicator, risk treatment
A log of identified AI risks with owners, ratings, controls, and treatment plans that is reviewed and updated throughout the AI life cycle.
- risk treatment
- Related: AI risk register, AI risk appetite, residual risk
The chosen response to an identified risk: mitigate with controls, transfer, avoid the activity, or accept it within approved appetite.
- residual risk
- Related: risk treatment, risk tolerance, AI risk register
The risk that remains after controls and treatments are applied, which must be compared with tolerance and formally accepted by an accountable owner.
- key risk indicator
- Related: model drift, AI risk register, risk tolerance
A measurable signal tracked over time, such as model drift rate or override frequency, that provides early warning that AI risk exposure is changing.
- model inventory
- Related: AI use case inventory, model documentation, model risk
A structured record of each model's purpose, version, owner, data sources, validation status, and dependencies, supporting oversight and change management.
- model risk
- Related: model validation, model drift, model documentation
The risk of loss or harm from incorrect, misused, or poorly understood model outputs, including errors in design, data, implementation, or interpretation.
- model validation
- Related: model risk, model drift, independent review
Independent testing of a model's conceptual soundness, data quality, and performance against requirements before and after deployment.
- model drift
- Related: model monitoring, key risk indicator, model validation
Degradation of model performance over time as real-world data or behavior diverges from what the model learned during training.
- model monitoring
- Related: model drift, key risk indicator, AI incident
Continuous tracking of AI system performance, inputs, outputs, and fairness metrics in production, with defined thresholds that trigger investigation or remediation.
- training data bias
- Related: bias, data quality, fairness
Skew or underrepresentation in the data used to build a model that causes systematically inaccurate or unfair outputs for certain groups or situations.
- data quality
- Related: training data bias, data leakage, model risk
The fitness of data for AI use, judged by accuracy, completeness, relevance, timeliness, and provenance, which directly affects model reliability.
- data leakage
- Related: shadow AI, acceptable use policy, privacy risk
Unauthorized exposure of sensitive data, including through prompts to external AI services or through training data that reveals confidential information.
- privacy risk
- Related: data leakage, AI impact assessment, data quality
The risk that AI processing of personal data causes unlawful or unexpected exposure, inference, or profiling of individuals.
- AI incident
- Related: AI incident response plan, model monitoring, lessons learned
An event where an AI system causes or nearly causes harm, such as a harmful output, outage, or discriminatory decision, requiring logging and response.
- AI incident response plan
- Related: AI incident, lessons learned, model monitoring
Documented procedures for detecting, containing, escalating, communicating, and remediating AI incidents, including roles and regulatory notification triggers.
- lessons learned
- Related: AI incident response plan, AI incident, AI risk register
A structured post-incident review that identifies root causes and updates controls, policies, or training so similar AI failures are less likely to recur.
- third-party AI risk
- Related: supply chain risk, model documentation, due diligence
Risk arising from vendors, foundation models, or data providers whose performance, security, and practices the organization does not directly control.