ISO 22000 LA study materials
ISO 22000 LA study resources

ISO 22000 LA study plan

ISO 22000 LA · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Fundamental principles and concepts of a food safety management system

  • Explain the purpose and structure of a food safety management system (FSMS) and how ISO 22000 relates to the Codex Alimentarius General Principles of Food Hygiene

  • Define and distinguish the twelve steps of HACCP and the seven HACCP principles, and map each to the corresponding ISO 22000 clause

  • Identify the key terms in ISO 22000 (hazard, food safety hazard, control measure, critical control point, operational prerequisite programme, acceptable level, action criterion) and state how each is used in practice

  • Describe the process approach and the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle as applied to an FSMS, including how interaction of processes is shown in a process map

Your checkpoint

A one-page glossary of at least 25 ISO 22000 terms with your own definitions, plus a table mapping the seven HACCP principles to ISO 22000 clauses, self-scored against the standard text

Week 2

Food safety management system (FSMS) requirements

  • Outline the clause structure of ISO 22000 from scope and normative references through to improvement, and state the intent of each main clause

  • Explain the requirements for prerequisite programmes (PRPs) and how PRP selection and verification differ from CCP monitoring

  • Describe how hazard analysis is performed: hazard identification, hazard assessment, selection and categorisation of control measures, and validation of the control measure combinations

  • Explain the requirements for the hazard control plan, including critical limits, action criteria, monitoring systems, and correction and corrective action

  • Describe the requirements for top management commitment, food safety policy, planning, support, and operation, and how they interlock

Your checkpoint

A clause-by-clause requirements map covering every main clause of ISO 22000, each with a two-sentence statement of auditor-relevant intent and one example of objective evidence you would look for

Week 3

Fundamental audit concepts and principles

  • Explain the audit principles in ISO 19011 (integrity, fair presentation, due professional care, confidentiality, independence, evidence-based approach, risk-based approach) and give a food-industry example of each

  • Distinguish first-party, second-party, and third-party audits and describe the roles, responsibilities, and competence requirements of the audit team, technical experts, and observers

  • Describe how audit risk is determined and how it influences sampling, planning, and the depth of investigation

  • Explain the difference between conformity, nonconformity, observation, and opportunity for improvement, and how evidence supports each conclusion

  • Explain the audit programme, audit plan, and audit criteria as distinct concepts, and identify who owns each

Your checkpoint

A written set of 10 scenario cards, each describing an audit situation and asking which principle, role, or concept applies, with your own answer key citing the relevant ISO 19011 or ISO 22000 clause

Week 4

Preparing for an ISO 22000 audit

  • Interpret the scope, boundaries, and interfaces of an FSMS and evaluate whether the client's stated scope is defensible given outsourced processes and shared facilities

  • Prepare a document review checklist that tests the food safety policy, hazard analysis, hazard control plan, PRP verification records, and management review inputs for completeness and internal consistency

  • Draft an audit plan for a realistic food manufacturing site that allocates time by risk, includes a site walk, and sequences interviews so that evidence can be cross-checked

  • Formulate audit criteria and a sampling approach for a two-stage (Stage 1 and Stage 2) certification audit

  • Write opening-meeting talking points that confirm scope, criteria, schedule, confidentiality, and the nonconformity escalation process

Your checkpoint

A complete Stage 2 audit plan and document review checklist for a fictional site, including risk-based time allocation, sampling rationale, and a list of documents requested in advance

Week 5

Conducting an ISO 22000 audit

  • Conduct evidence-gathering interviews using open, closed, and probing questions, and practise tracing a hazard from raw material intake through to the hazard control plan and verification records

  • Trace product and process flow on site, including water, steam, air, waste, and personnel routes, and identify where cross-contamination or loss of control could occur

  • Evaluate the adequacy of hazard analysis by testing whether identified hazards match the process steps and whether control measures are validated

  • Assess PRP implementation through observation and records, including cleaning, pest control, maintenance, allergen control, and supplier approval

  • Write nonconformities that state the requirement, the objective evidence, and the gap precisely enough to be auditable, and classify them by severity

Your checkpoint

Five well-formed nonconformity reports based on a simulated audit scenario, each citing a specific requirement, factual evidence, and a severity justification, reviewed against a self-made quality checklist

Week 6

Closing an ISO 22000 audit

  • Prepare and run a closing meeting that presents findings, confirms evidence, explains the nonconformity grading, and sets expectations for corrective action and follow-up

  • Evaluate a corrective action submission for root cause analysis, systemic correction, and effectiveness verification, and decide whether the response is acceptable

  • Explain the certification decision process, the role of the technical reviewer, and the conditions under which a certificate is suspended, withdrawn, or reduced in scope

  • Describe the requirements for audit report content, distribution, confidentiality, and retention, and the handling of appeals and complaints

  • Explain surveillance and recertification audit planning and how previous findings influence the next audit programme

Your checkpoint

A closing meeting script plus a written evaluation of two sample corrective action responses, one accepted and one rejected, with the reasoning and the follow-up evidence you would require

Week 7

Managing an ISO 22000 audit program

  • Design an audit programme for a multi-site food organisation, including audit frequency, risk inputs, resource allocation, and competence needs of the audit team

  • Explain how the audit programme is monitored, reviewed, and improved, and what records demonstrate this

  • Identify impartiality threats (consultancy, internal audits, training, financial ties) and describe how an audit body manages them

  • Describe the competence criteria for ISO 22000 auditors, including food sector knowledge, HACCP expertise, and audit skills, and how competence is maintained

  • Explain the relationship between ISO 22000, ISO 22003, and accreditation requirements for certification bodies

Your checkpoint

A one-year audit programme document for a fictional company with three sites, showing risk-based frequency, resource and competence plan, impartiality safeguards, and programme review points

Week 8

Fundamental principles and concepts of a food safety management system & Food safety management system (FSMS) requirements & Fundamental audit concepts and principles & Preparing for an ISO 22000 audit & Conducting an ISO 22000 audit & Closing an ISO 22000 audit & Managing an ISO 22000 audit program

  • Review your glossary, requirements map, audit plan, nonconformity reports, and programme document, and correct any gaps or inaccuracies

  • Complete two full timed mock exams covering all seven domains and analyse every wrong answer by domain and root cause

  • Rehearse the audit trail: hazard analysis to control plan to monitoring to verification to management review, explaining each link aloud without notes

  • Identify your three weakest domains and write a targeted one-hour refresher for each

  • Confirm exam-day logistics, permitted reference materials, and time management strategy

Your checkpoint

A scored mock exam log showing at least 80 percent overall with no domain below 70 percent, plus a one-page personal weak-area remediation list with evidence of completion

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain, without notes, how hazard analysis flows into the hazard control plan and how PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs are distinguished, scoring at least 80 percent on a self-made 20-question quiz

Week 4: Has produced a risk-based Stage 2 audit plan and document review checklist that a peer or mentor reviews as complete and logically sequenced

Week 6: Can write a nonconformity and evaluate a corrective action response to a standard that a reviewer judges audit-ready, with correct citation of requirements and defensible severity grading

Week 8: Scores at least 80 percent overall on two timed mock exams with no domain below 70 percent, and all seven domain deliverables are complete and self-reviewed