ISO 22000 LI study plan
ISO 22000 LI · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Fundamental principles and concepts of a food safety management system
Explain the purpose and scope of an FSMS and how ISO 22000 relates to the Codex Alimentarius general principles of food hygiene
Map the process approach (inputs, outputs, interactions, PDCA, risk-based thinking) onto a food chain organisation you know
Distinguish food safety hazards from quality and legality issues, and classify biological, chemical and physical hazards with two examples each
Define the key vocabulary: hazard, hazard analysis, control measure, OPRP, CCP, critical limit, validation, verification, acceptable level, action criterion
Describe the interactive communication requirement and identify external and internal parties that must exchange food safety information
Your checkpoint
A one-page concept map linking FSMS vocabulary to the PDCA cycle, plus a 20-term glossary written in your own words
Food safety management system requirements
Outline the structure of the ISO 22000 requirements clauses and state what each clause demands in one sentence
Reproduce the mandatory documented information list from memory and check it against the standard
Explain the difference between the food safety policy, food safety objectives and operational food safety controls
Interpret the requirements for the hazard analysis steps: hazard identification, hazard assessment, selection and categorisation of control measures
Describe how the HACCP plan and the OPRP plan together form the operational PRPs layer of control
Your checkpoint
A clause-by-clause summary table of the requirements with a column for 'evidence an auditor would expect'
Food safety management system requirements & Planning of an FSMS implementation based on ISO 22000
Explain prerequisite programmes (PRPs) and select relevant PRP topics for a chosen product and process
Draft the scope statement of an FSMS: products, processes, sites and boundaries, with justified exclusions
Construct a process flow diagram for a simple product and verify it against the actual process steps
Perform a hazard analysis for at least six process steps, assigning control measures and justifying CCP versus OPRP decisions
Identify the resources, competence and infrastructure needed to plan the implementation
Your checkpoint
A verified flow diagram plus a hazard analysis worksheet covering at least six steps with justified control measure decisions
Planning of an FSMS implementation based on ISO 22000
Build a Gantt-style implementation plan with owners, dependencies and dates for each ISO 22000 clause
Define food safety objectives and derive measurable action criteria and critical limits for the identified CCPs
Plan the validation activities needed before control measures go live, and state what evidence counts as validation
Design a documented information structure (manual, procedures, records, retention periods) that satisfies the standard
Identify legal, customer and certification-body requirements that constrain the implementation plan
Your checkpoint
A dated implementation plan with named owners and a validation protocol for each CCP
Implementation of an FSMS based on ISO 22000
Write two operational procedures (for example monitoring of a CCP and handling of nonconforming product) that meet the clause requirements
Set up the record templates needed to evidence monitoring, correction, corrective action and verification
Describe how to implement the communication arrangements: supplier approval, customer communication, escalation of food safety issues
Explain the requirements for competence, awareness and training records for food safety team members and operators
Design the traceability system and test its ability to link raw material lots to finished product lots and back
Your checkpoint
A procedure and record pack of at least four templates, plus a documented traceability test result
Monitoring and measurement of an FSMS based on ISO 22000
Distinguish monitoring, measurement, verification and validation activities and give an example of each in an FSMS
Design a verification schedule covering PRPs, OPRPs, CCPs and the hazard analysis itself
Plan an internal audit programme: scope, criteria, auditor independence, frequency and reporting
Specify how to analyse verification and monitoring results to decide whether the FSMS is effective and food safety hazards are controlled
Prepare the inputs and outputs of a management review that satisfy the standard
Your checkpoint
A verification schedule and internal audit programme covering a full year, with one completed audit checklist
Continual improvement of an FSMS based on ISO 22000
Explain how nonconformity, correction, corrective action and root cause analysis differ and when each applies
Select and apply a root cause technique (5 Whys, fishbone) to a realistic food safety nonconformity
Describe how to handle potentially unsafe product: evaluation, release decision, withdrawal and recall, and notification
Identify improvement sources: verification results, audit findings, complaints, incidents, changes in legislation and technology
Update the hazard analysis when a process, product or legal requirement changes, and document the update
Your checkpoint
A completed corrective action report with root cause analysis and an updated hazard analysis section reflecting a change scenario
Preparation for an FSMS certification audit & Fundamental principles and concepts of a food safety management system & Food safety management system requirements
Assemble the evidence pack an auditor would request, organised by clause
Perform a mock Stage 1 and Stage 2 audit against the standard and score your own readiness
Answer exam-style questions on all seven domains under timed conditions and review every wrong answer
Explain the certification cycle: application, Stage 1, Stage 2, surveillance and recertification audits
List the most common nonconformities cited in FSMS certification audits and state how to pre-empt each
Your checkpoint
A readiness scorecard with gaps closed or flagged, plus a timed 60-question practice test result with a written review of errors
Milestones
Week 2: Can state the purpose of every requirements clause and list the mandatory documented information without notes
Week 4: Hazard analysis is complete for the chosen product, with each control measure justified as CCP or OPRP and a validation approach defined
Week 6: Verification and audit programmes are written, and one internal audit has been executed with findings recorded
Week 8: Mock audit yields no major gaps against the standard and timed practice test scores at least 80 percent