IR Level I study materials
IR Level I study resources

IR Level I cheat sheet

IR Level I · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Incident Response Fundamentals and Frameworks

  • NIST SP 800-61 defines four lifecycle phases: Preparation; Detection and Analysis; Containment, Eradication, and Recovery; Post-Incident Activity.

  • The SANS/PICERL model uses six steps: Preparation, Identification, Containment, Eradication, Recovery, Lessons Learned; steps repeat until the incident is closed.

  • ISO/IEC 27035 structures IR as five stages: prepare, detect and report, assess and decide, respond, and learn.

  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 core functions are Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover.

  • Event versus incident: an event is any observable occurrence in a system or network; an incident is an event that actually or potentially harms confidentiality, integrity, or availability.

  • Severity score = f(business impact, scope of affected assets, data sensitivity, whether activity is ongoing); the resulting tier drives escalation and notification decisions.

  • Role split: incident commander owns decisions and escalation; handlers investigate and preserve evidence; communications lead controls messaging; legal counsel advises on obligations.

  • Core metrics are MTTD, MTTA, MTTC, and MTTR, each computed from an explicitly defined start timestamp (first telemetry versus first human report).

  • Escalation trigger rule: escalate when the severity tier threshold is crossed, scope extends beyond one host or subnet, or regulated data is suspected to be involved.

Quick reference

Preparation and Capability Building

  • A complete IR plan contains policy and authority, roles, escalation paths, severity definitions, contact rosters, communication channels, and per-incident-type playbooks.

  • Playbooks are built per scenario class: ransomware, business email compromise, phishing, insider misuse, web compromise, DDoS, and data exfiltration.

  • Exercise tiers ascend in fidelity: seminar, tabletop, functional drill, full-scale simulation, and red team versus blue team engagement.

  • A jump kit holds a write blocker, validated imaging and hashing tools, sterile media, chain-of-custody forms, network taps, and an analysis laptop with current tool versions.

  • Out-of-band communication (separate bridge line, secondary mail domain, or off-network messaging) is required because responders cannot assume corporate email survives.

  • Log retention must exceed expected attacker dwell time and satisfy regulatory minimums; short retention silently caps the achievable detection and investigation window.

  • Preparation baselines: current asset inventory, network diagrams, Active Directory and cloud tenant documentation, centralized NTP, and time-zone normalization to UTC.

  • Pre-negotiated artifacts shorten response: external IR retainer, forensic firm contacts, cyber insurance notification channel, and law enforcement points of contact.

  • Capability metrics include time to assemble the team, exercise objectives met, and percentage of post-exercise corrective actions closed on schedule.

Quick reference

Detection and Analysis

  • Order of volatility (RFC 3227): registers and cache, memory, network state, running processes, disk, remote logs, archival media; collect the most perishable first.

  • Atomic indicators (hash, IP, domain) are cheap for adversaries to change; behavioral TTP indicators sit higher on the Pyramid of Pain and last longer.

  • Corroboration rule: a single indicator is a lead, not a finding; confirm with at least two independent data sources before declaring an incident.

  • Standard log sources: EDR telemetry, SIEM correlation, DNS queries, web proxy, authentication logs, firewall and NetFlow, cloud audit trails, and SaaS access logs.

  • Timeline construction normalizes all sources to UTC and corrects clock skew; unverified host clocks create false sequencing conclusions.

  • Triage questions: what happened, when, which hosts and accounts, what data is exposed, is the activity ongoing, and who must be informed.

  • Alert outcomes are true positive, benign true positive, or false positive; only true positive and unresolved benign true positive cases escalate.

  • Evidence integrity: hash before and after analysis, document collector, time, location, and purpose, and maintain an unbroken chain of custody.

  • Detection engineering maps existing rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques to expose coverage gaps, which then become hunt hypotheses.

Quick reference

Containment, Eradication, and Recovery

  • Containment options ordered by evidence impact: network ACL or VLAN isolation, EDR host isolation, account disablement, DNS or IP blocking; powering off a host destroys volatile evidence.

  • Short-term containment stops spread immediately; long-term containment stabilizes the environment while eradication is planned.

  • Containment criteria are defined before action: confirm malicious activity, protect critical systems, preserve evidence, and avoid tipping off the adversary prematurely.

  • Eradication removes the foothold: delete malware, rebuild from known-good images, patch the exploited vulnerability, and invalidate stolen credentials and active sessions.

  • Rebuild-versus-clean rule: rebuild when persistence, rootkit activity, or configuration integrity is uncertain; clean in place only when compromise scope is fully established.

  • Active Directory Golden Ticket recovery requires resetting the krbtgt password twice with replication between resets to invalidate forged Kerberos tickets.

  • Recovery validates before return to service: clean-state confirmation, data integrity checks, closed entry vector, and heightened monitoring during a defined watch window.

  • Backups used for restoration are verified for integrity and checked for pre-compromise contamination; unverified archives reintroduce the attacker.

  • Ransomware sequence: preserve encrypted systems and logs first, check public decryptors and law enforcement channels, then restore from validated offline backups.

Quick reference

Post-Incident Activity and Continuous Improvement

  • The lessons learned review occurs within roughly two weeks of closure while responder memory is fresh; attendees include handlers, system owners, legal, and communications.

  • Standing agenda: what happened, what worked, what did not, root cause, and corrective actions with named owners and due dates.

  • Root cause analysis uses the Five Whys or causal factor analysis to separate the proximate trigger from the failing control or process that allowed the incident.

  • The final report carries an executive summary, scope, timeline, root cause, business impact, evidence references, and prioritized recommendations.

  • Corrective actions stay open in a tracked register until verified effective; the next exercise or audit provides the retest evidence.

  • Trend metrics: incidents by type, MTTD, dwell time, MTTC, MTTR, reopened incidents, and repeat root causes across incidents.

  • Outputs feed preparation: updated playbooks, new detection rules, revised asset inventory, refreshed contact rosters, and training content.

  • Evidence retention follows legal, regulatory, and policy schedules; destruction occurs only after legal hold review and retention expiry.

  • Blameless framing increases reporting fidelity; disciplinary use of review findings suppresses future disclosure of incidents.

Quick reference

Threat Intelligence and Proactive Hunting

  • Intelligence tiers: strategic (risk and intent), operational (campaigns and actors), tactical (TTPs), and technical (atomic IOCs such as hashes, IPs, domains).

  • Source reliability is scored with the Admiralty system: letters A-F for source reliability and digits 1-6 for information credibility.

  • IOC half-life is short for hashes and IPs and long for TTPs; detection portfolios overweighted to atomic IOCs decay quickly.

  • Sharing standards: STIX for the data model, TAXII for transport, MISP for community exchange; TLP (RED, AMBER, GREEN, CLEAR) defines distribution limits.

  • Hunting is hypothesis-driven: start from an ATT&CK technique or behavioral hypothesis rather than an alert queue.

  • Hunt maturity ladder: ad hoc searching, hypothesis-driven, modeled against ATT&CK, then automated as production analytics.

  • F3EAD cycle: Find, Fix, Finish, Exploit, Analyze, Disseminate - pairs targeting with exploitation of newly collected data.

  • Hunt data requirements: EDR process lineage, DNS and proxy logs, authentication events, cloud audit logs, and network flow records retained long enough to cover the hypothesis window.

  • A successful hunt closes the loop by producing a durable detection analytic; an unsuccessful hunt documents the tested hypothesis and coverage evidence.

Quick reference

Legal, Ethical, and Reporting Obligations

  • GDPR Article 33: notify the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach unless it is unlikely to result in a risk; notify individuals when risk is high.

  • US SEC rules: public companies file Form 8-K Item 1.05 within four business days of determining that a cybersecurity incident is material.

  • HIPAA breach notification: affected individuals, HHS, and where applicable the media, without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days from discovery.

  • NIS2 (EU): early warning within 24 hours, incident notification within 72 hours, and a final report within one month of a significant incident.

  • PCI DSS requires prompt notice to the acquiring bank and card brands; compromised entities typically must engage a PCI Forensic Investigator.

  • Legal hold suspends deletion and alteration of records once litigation, investigation, or audit is reasonably anticipated; it overrides routine retention destruction.

  • Attorney-client privilege can protect investigation findings when external counsel directs the work from the outset and confidentiality is maintained.

  • Ethical boundary: responders act only within authorized scope; civilian hack-back and counter-attack are generally unlawful, and evidence must be preserved for possible prosecution.

  • Privacy minimization applies during investigations: collect only the personal data needed, restrict access to need-to-know, and log every access to evidence.