Peanut Allergy, Oden Pot, 2:15 a.m.
At 2:15 a.m. on a Saturday, a 24-hour convenience store two blocks from Fukuoka's cruise terminal is staffed by one person: a Vietnamese national who has been in Japan fourteen months and holds N3. A customer from Australia asks, in fast English, whether the oden daikon contains peanuts; her seven-year-old son has a severe allergy and carries an EpiPen. The oden pot holds seven items. A laminated sheet listing ingredients sits on the back counter, in Japanese only, and covers the broth but not the individual items. The broth concentrate is delivered in bags with a manufacturer label. Chilled bento and onigiri carry full 特定原材料 labelling; the fried chicken is cooked in shared oil. The assistant manager is on a 30-minute break in the back room. The store manual says only that staff should 「respond courteously to inquiries」 and gives no allergy procedure.
1. What may the staff member say and show, and which sentences must he not use?
Read the worked answer
He may state only what he can verify, and must not convert a guess into reassurance. Show her the manufacturer's label and point to 落花生 in the eight mandatory allergen items, and use a translation app or handwritten kanji so the word is visible rather than spoken at speed.
The sentences he must not use are: 「I think it's fine」, 「probably no peanuts」, 「it's safe」, and 「other customers with allergies eat it」. Packaged processed foods in Japan must declare the eight mandatory allergens, but oden sold from an in-store pot falls outside that labelling obligation, so no label exists that would let him guarantee anything - the absence of a warning is not evidence of safety. The accurate sentence is 「I cannot confirm that this product is free from peanuts」. That is not unhelpful: it moves the risk decision to the parent, who holds the medical information. He should also mention the shared ladle and the shared frying oil, because cross-contact, not the recipe, is the realistic route to anaphylaxis here.
2. What should he do about the oden specifically, and what alternative can he offer?
Read the worked answer
For the oden, the honest answer is that no guarantee is possible, and he should say so plainly rather than disappear into the back room to search. He should then do two useful things.
First, offer sealed alternatives whose labels are complete - onigiri, sandwiches, bottled drinks - and let the mother read the label herself. That is faster and safer than him translating under time pressure, and it gives her a product she can trust on evidence rather than on his assurance. Second, once her immediate decision is made, call the assistant manager off break or ring the store manager for the 商品規格書 and the manufacturer's allergen information, and raise the fact that the store has no allergy procedure at all.
What he must not do is hand over the broth concentrate bag as proof. It covers the concentrate only, not the pot, the ladle, the other six items, or the oil.
3. If the child begins to show symptoms in the store, what is the correct sequence?
Read the worked answer
Call 119 first: give the address, state that a child has a suspected anaphylactic reaction and that an EpiPen is present, and follow the dispatcher's instructions. In Japan the EpiPen is prescribed to the patient and is in principle self-administered, so a store employee should not inject it himself; his role is to help the mother position the child, keep the airway clear, note the time of onset and what was eaten, and keep the packaging.
Do not induce vomiting and do not give food or drink. A second person should bring the AED and clear the entrance for the ambulance, and the assistant manager should be called out. Afterwards, preserve the product, the receipt and the relevant CCTV, write an incident record with times, and report to the store manager - and to the local health centre if a food-related cause is suspected. The store should then write the allergy procedure it currently lacks.