The 1892 Apple Growers' Petition and the Missing Branch Line
A local history club in Aomori is analyzing a petition dated 1892 from 37 apple growers in the Tsugaru Plain. The handwritten text says: 'The cart road to the port takes two days in snow; last year 40% of our apples spoiled before shipment. The proposed railway would reach the Nambu side, not our stores. We ask for a branch line or a cold warehouse at the port.' A railway company map shows the main line running 30 km east of the growers. A port record lists 12 steamships in 1891, but only four in winter. The club must write an exhibit label explaining why the petitioners wanted a branch line and how reliable the petition is as evidence. A rival apple-growing district on the Nambu side already has a station.
1. Identify the petitioners' main economic problem and explain how the railway geography worsened it.
Read the worked answer
The main problem is spoilage before shipment: 40% of last year's apples spoiled because the cart road to the port takes two days in snow. The railway map shows the main line 30 km east of the growers, so the railway does not shorten their land transport; they would still need carts to reach it. The port record makes the timing worse: 12 steamships in 1891 fall to only four in winter, exactly when the growers need reliable shipment after harvest. A branch line would cut the cart distance, and a cold warehouse at the port would reduce the time apples wait for a ship. The petition therefore links a transport gap to a measurable loss.
2. Assess the reliability of the petition as evidence for a historian. Give two strengths and two limitations.
Read the worked answer
One strength is specificity: the petition is dated 1892, names 37 growers, gives a travel time of two days, and states a 40% spoilage rate. That makes it useful for showing local economic experience. A second strength is that it comes from the people who bore the transport cost, so it preserves their voice. One limitation is purpose: a petition selects evidence to persuade, so it may emphasize spoilage and omit successful shipments. A second limitation is representativeness: 37 growers may not speak for all farmers, and the document gives no railway company cost data. A historian should corroborate it with port shipping records, railway accounts, and evidence from the rival Nambu district.
3. The railway company claimed a branch line was too costly. Using the source, propose one question the club should ask before judging the claim.
Read the worked answer
The club should ask: what annual freight volume and revenue would a branch line generate compared with a cold warehouse at the port? The petition gives spoilage and travel time but not tonnage, so the club cannot yet compare the company's construction cost with the growers' losses. A second useful question is how the Nambu station changed shipments in the rival district. If the station raised freight volume sharply, that would test the company's cost claim; if not, the cold warehouse may be the cheaper response. The club should present both possibilities rather than assume the petition is automatically correct.