The Scholarship Paragraph With 62 Words Left
A student is writing a 120-word paragraph for a scholarship application. The prompt asks: 'Describe a time you changed your mind after hearing someone else's view.' The student's draft opening is:
'When I was in the second year, I was in the debate club. I thought that winning was the most important thing. Then I heard a first-year student speak. She said that in a debate, if you make the other person think, you have already won. I changed my mind. This experience taught me a lot.'
The draft is 58 words so far. The student has 62 words left and wants to include three things: (1) a specific debate topic, (2) what the first-year student actually said, (3) what the student did differently in the next debate. The application readers value concrete detail and a clear change, not inspirational slogans. The student also tends to write long, linked sentences and has been told that sentence variety matters.
1. Revise the first four sentences so the problem and the change are concrete. Keep the first-person voice and leave room for the three requested details.
Read the worked answer
A stronger opening might read: 'In my second year, our debate club argued whether the cafeteria should stop selling plastic bottles. I went into the semi-final treating every exchange as a point to win, and I interrupted opponents to score. Then a first-year student said something I could not answer: "If your opponent leaves thinking, you have already won."' This version does three things. It names a specific topic, replacing the vague 'debate club' setting. It shows the old belief through behavior ('interrupted opponents to score') rather than stating 'winning was important.' It gives the first-year student's line as a quotation, which the prompt asks for. It also varies sentence length: a medium opening, a longer behavior sentence, then a short attribution. The original 'Then I heard a first-year student speak' is not wrong, but it delays the concrete detail.
2. The student wants to end with 'This experience taught me a lot.' Explain why that ending weakens the paragraph and offer a specific closing sentence that fits the remaining words.
Read the worked answer
'This experience taught me a lot' is a placeholder, not a conclusion. It tells the reader that learning happened but not what changed, so the paragraph's key claim - a changed mind - remains abstract. It also repeats the opening's generality and spends words that the 120-word limit cannot spare. A specific closing should name the new behavior or principle: 'In the next debate I let the other side finish, asked one question about their evidence, and argued to make the audience reconsider rather than to silence my opponent.' That sentence supplies the third requested detail and shows the change in action. It is longer than the slogan, so the student should cut an earlier sentence, such as 'I changed my mind,' which the new ending demonstrates. The reader should see the change, not be told to admire it.
3. The 120-word limit forces cuts. Rank the three requested details by how much they contribute to the paragraph's purpose, and explain what you would compress or drop.
Read the worked answer
The first-year student's exact idea is the highest priority because it is the external view that caused the change; without it, the paragraph has no trigger. The next-debate action is second because it proves the change rather than merely asserting it. The specific debate topic is third, but it is still valuable because it makes the scene concrete and shows the stakes. If words run short, compress the topic to a clause ('whether to ban plastic bottles in the cafeteria') rather than dropping it. Compress the club context to 'our debate club' and cut 'This experience taught me a lot.' Keep the quotation and the changed behavior. The paragraph's logic is belief → heard → changed → acted; any detail that does not serve that chain is a candidate for cutting.