A School-Trip Announcement Heard Only Twice
Yui is working through the listening section of the Oita entrance examination. The recording plays a school-trip announcement twice. The teacher says: 'The bus leaves at 7:40 from the north gate. Please be at the gate twenty minutes before that. Bring a raincoat, not an umbrella - the ridge path is windy and umbrellas are dangerous up there. Lunch is provided, but you need 500 yen for the ropeway. If you feel sick on the bus, tell me before we leave, not after. We will be back at school by 5:10, so students who take the train should plan to leave school at 5:25.'
Yui's notes read: 'Meet 7:40 / lunch money 500 yen / bring umbrella / back 5:10.' The questions that follow ask about the meeting time, what students must bring, and when train users should leave school. She has one minute between the second playing and the questions.
1. Yui's notes contain two errors. Identify them and state what the notes should say, using only evidence from the announcement.
Read the worked answer
Both errors come from writing down the first time or noun heard instead of the one the question asks about.
- Meeting time. 'The bus leaves at 7:40' is the departure. 'Be at the gate twenty minutes before that' fixes the meeting time at 7:20. 7:40 is an attractive wrong option, and 7:00 is the other trap for students who subtract the wrong number.
- What to bring. The instruction is negative: 'a raincoat, not an umbrella.' Negatives are easy to drop while writing, so the note should read raincoat.
The money is already correct, but note why: lunch is provided, so the 500 yen is for the ropeway, not for food. That distinction is the kind of detail a later question can turn on.
2. A question asks, 'Why does the teacher say umbrellas are dangerous?' A classmate answers, 'Because it will rain.' Explain why this is a trap and what the credited answer is.
Read the worked answer
The credited answer is 'because the ridge path is windy.'
'Because it will rain' is real-world reasoning: raincoats are for rain, so rain feels like the cause. But the announcement never mentions rain at all. It gives exactly one reason - wind makes umbrellas dangerous on the ridge - and the exam rewards the because-clause that is actually spoken.
The practical rule: when two options are both plausible, choose the one whose content is in the recording. Entrance-exam listening items test whether you heard the stated reason, not whether you can guess the most likely weather.
3. What time should train users leave school, and why is '5:10' such an attractive wrong answer?
Read the worked answer
5:25.
The recording contains two times, and only one answers the question. 5:10 is when the bus arrives back at school. Train users are told to plan to leave school at 5:25 - that is 5:10 plus fifteen minutes to collect their things. 5:10 feels right because it is the only time attached to 'school' and it comes first, so it is already written down before the question arrives.
The difficulty is not the arithmetic; it is holding both numbers in memory while the recording moves on. Write times as digits the moment you hear them, and mark which one belongs to which group.