Oita Public High School Entrance Examination - English study materials
Oita Public High School Entrance Examination - English study resources

A Polite Refusal and a Notice With Two Conditions

Oita Public High School Entrance Examination - English · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A Polite Refusal and a Notice With Two Conditions

Ken and Mia are third-year students. Their dialogue appears in the short-reading section.

Ken: 'Are you coming to the river cleanup on Sunday? We start at nine.' Mia: 'I'd love to, but my host family is taking me to Beppu that day. I'm really sorry.' Ken: 'That's too bad. We're short of people this year.' Mia: 'I know. Ask me again next month - I should be free after the twentieth.'

The same page shows a notice: 'VOLUNTEERS WANTED - Riverside Park, Sunday 9:00–11:30. Gloves and bags are provided. Bring your own drink. Sign up at the staff room by Friday. If it rains, the event is cancelled; there is no indoor alternative.'

The questions ask what Mia means, what she will probably do next month, and what a student who decides on Saturday should do.

1. A question asks what Mia means by 'Ask me again next month.' One student writes, 'She promises to join next month.' Explain why this over-reads the dialogue and what a safer answer looks like.

Read the worked answer

'I'd love to, but …' is the standard polite refusal in English: the first clause carries warmth, and the word but carries the actual answer. Mia is saying no to Sunday, not yes to next month.

'Ask me again next month' and 'I should be free after the twentieth' describe her schedule; they do not describe a decision. She has not promised anything, because she has not been asked about a specific date yet.

A safer answer: 'She cannot come this Sunday, but she may be able to help next month.' The error to avoid is upgrading a possibility ('should be free') into a commitment. Exams test that difference deliberately.

2. A student hears about the cleanup on Saturday morning and wants to help on Sunday. Based only on the notice, what two things must that student check?

Read the worked answer

The notice supplies two deciding facts.

  1. The sign-up deadline. Names close on Friday at the staff room. The notice does not say late volunteers will be turned away, but it does not say they will be accepted either, so the student must ask at the staff room rather than simply appear.
  2. The weather. The event is cancelled if it rains, and there is explicitly no indoor alternative, so the forecast on Sunday morning decides whether to go at all.

The trap here is inventing information. The notice never states 'no late entries' and never names a rain date. A strong answer stays inside the two lines the notice actually gives.

3. The question 'What will Mia probably do next month?' offers 'She will join the cleanup' and 'She will be free after the twentieth.' Which is supported, and what is the reasoning?

Read the worked answer

Only the second is supported.

'She will be free after the twentieth' restates what Mia actually said about her schedule. 'She will join the cleanup' requires a decision that is never made - the Sunday cleanup happens this week, not next month, and Mia never agrees to any future event.

The distinction the item tests is between what a speaker says and what a speaker will do. Predicting an action needs evidence of a decision (an agreement, a plan, a promise). Predicting availability needs only a statement about time. When an option converts a statement into an action, it is almost always the distractor.