PSRA Level 1 Exam study materials
PSRA Level 1 Exam study resources

Multi-Agency Interoperability at an Ammonia Release

PSRA Level 1 Exam · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Multi-Agency Interoperability at an Ammonia Release

During a three-day county fair, a tanker truck leaks anhydrous ammonia at the fairgrounds. Responding agencies include City Police on a UHF conventional system at 453.2125 MHz, County Sheriff on VHF high-band conventional, Fire and EMS on a 700 MHz P25 Phase 2 trunked system, State Emergency Management on an 800 MHz P25 system, and a regional HazMat team with analog VHF radios. The fairgrounds are in a valley with spotty cellular coverage. Unified command is established. The incident commander asks for one communications plan that lets fire, law enforcement, EMS, and HazMat talk to each other within 15 minutes and that can be documented for the after-action report. No cross-band gateway is currently at the scene; one is available from the state cache 45 minutes away.

1. What immediate interoperability solution would you implement, and which channels would you assign?

Read the worked answer

Assign a Communications Unit Leader and build the plan around national interoperability channels plus cache radios, because no gateway is on scene and the agencies do not share a band. For VHF units, use the national VHF interoperability calling and tactical channels; for UHF units, use the national UHF interoperability channels; for 700 MHz P25 units, use the national 700 MHz calling and tactical channels; for 800 MHz P25 units, use the corresponding 800 MHz interoperability channels. However, only radios programmed for those channels can use them.

Within 15 minutes, deploy cache radios as the practical bridge: place one cache radio at each agency command post, set them to a common simplex tactical channel, and use them for command-level coordination. Keep fireground tactical traffic separate from command traffic. Request the state gateway for cross-band linking, but do not wait for it. Use plain language and assign channels by function: Command, Operations, HazMat Entry, and EMS Medical.

2. How should the communications plan be documented, and what should the COML do during the incident?

Read the worked answer

Document the plan on an ICS 205 Communications List. For each agency, record the radio system, channel or talkgroup, transmit and receive frequency, mode, encryption status, and function. Include the cache-radio bridge plan and the gateway request time. The COML should brief users, test channels, monitor channel loading, resolve encryption mismatches, and update the plan as the gateway arrives.

The after-action report should capture which channels were used, failures, gateway performance, and whether users could hear each other. The plan should keep HazMat entry and command on separate channels; putting entry teams and command on one channel creates congestion and loses tactical control. Include a backup simplex plan if the trunked system or gateway fails.

3. What are the principal risks in this interoperability plan, and how would you mitigate them?

Read the worked answer

Principal risks:

  • Gateway delay: the state gateway may arrive after the 15-minute requirement. Mitigate with cache radios and simplex command channels.
  • Radios not programmed for interoperability channels: verify programming before the event where possible; otherwise use cache radios.
  • Encryption mismatch: some radios may be clear while others are encrypted. Decide at command whether the common channel is clear, and keep sensitive tactical traffic on encrypted channels.
  • Valley coverage: simplex may not reach all agencies. Use a portable repeater or a high-level cache radio if available.
  • Channel congestion: separate command, operations, and EMS medical traffic; assign a channel controller.

Document these mitigations in the ICS 205 and brief them at the unified command meeting.