Cash Apartment Purchase Split Into Two Deeds and a False Price
Notary Gulnara in Bishkek receives a request to certify a sale of a two-room apartment for 9,600,000 som. The buyer is a 29-year-old student with no registered income. He arrives with an unrelated 55-year-old man, Erlan, who carries a sports bag with cash and gives instructions. The seller is a 67-year-old pensioner who bought the flat four months ago for 5,200,000 som. The buyer asks for two contracts: one for 4,800,000 som for the apartment and one for 4,800,000 som for furniture and repairs. He also asks the notary to state the price as 2,000,000 som in the deed 'to save tax,' while the cash handover is 9,600,000. Erlan refuses to show ID and says he is just helping a relative. The buyer cannot explain the source of funds. The notary's AML file shows the buyer is not a PEP, but Erlan is a former deputy minister. The seller insists on cash and wants completion today.
1. Identify the money-laundering red flags in this file and explain why they matter for a notary.
Read the worked answer
The red flags include: a young buyer with no visible income paying 9,600,000 som in cash; an unrelated third party carrying the cash and directing the deal; refusal by that third party to identify himself; a former deputy minister acting through a nominee, which raises PEP and beneficial-ownership concerns; a quick resale only four months after purchase; a request to split one economic transaction into two deeds; a request to record a false price of 2,000,000 som; and pressure to complete immediately.
These matter because the notary is an obliged entity under Kyrgyz anti-money-laundering law. The notary must not merely notarize what the parties ask for. The pattern suggests structuring, possible concealment of the beneficial owner, and tax evasion. Certifying a false price would turn the notarial deed into a false document and could expose the notary to criminal, administrative, and disciplinary liability.
2. What customer due diligence must the notary perform before any certification, and what should the notary do if it cannot be completed?
Read the worked answer
The notary must identify and verify the buyer, the seller, and any beneficial owner. Erlan must be identified because he controls the cash and gives instructions; a claim that he is 'just helping' does not remove the obligation. The notary should establish the source of funds and source of wealth, ask why the transaction is split, and compare the contract price with the market value and the recent purchase price. The notary must screen Erlan as a PEP and assess the higher risk that follows.
If the buyer cannot explain the funds and Erlan refuses identification, the notary cannot complete customer due diligence. The notary must refuse to certify the deeds, must not accept a false price, and should not allow the parties to walk away with a prepared draft that can be used elsewhere. The notary should document the refusal and the facts in the AML file.
3. What reporting and confidentiality obligations arise, and may the notary warn the parties?
Read the worked answer
The notary must file a suspicious transaction report with the authorized AML body when the transaction is abandoned because of money-laundering suspicion. The report should describe the cash, the split structure, the false price request, Erlan's role and refusal to identify himself, and the buyer's inability to explain the funds. The notary must keep records for the period required by law and make them available to supervisors.
The notary must not tip off the parties that a report has been filed or that they are under suspicion. Notarial secrecy protects the contents of the file, but it does not block a report made in the manner prescribed by AML law. The notary should also avoid discussing the case with the real estate agent or the office assistant beyond those who need to know.