ERA Senior Civil Servant Exam study materials
ERA Senior Civil Servant Exam study resources

ERA Senior Civil Servant Exam study plan

ERA Senior Civil Servant Exam · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Policy Analysis and Policy Formulation

  • Map the full policy cycle from agenda-setting to evaluation and annotate each stage with the decision gate at which evidence is required.

  • Draft a problem definition for a selected policy issue using a problem tree with at least three root causes and two measurable symptoms.

  • Construct a stakeholder power–interest grid with at least eight actors and assign an engagement tactic to each quadrant.

  • Formulate four mutually exclusive policy options and score them against five appraisal criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, equity, feasibility and legality.

Your checkpoint

A 1,500-word policy options paper containing the problem tree, stakeholder grid and a weighted appraisal matrix with a justified recommendation.

Week 2

Policy Analysis and Policy Formulation & Law, Regulation and Regulatory Practice

  • Conduct a cost–benefit and cost-effectiveness comparison of the two strongest Week 1 options, applying a stated discount rate and reporting a sensitivity range.

  • Draft a regulatory impact assessment outline that names the market failure, the proposed instrument and the compliance cost imposed on business and citizens.

  • Map the legal hierarchy of instruments - constitution, statute, delegated regulation, guidance - and classify five examples by legal force and amendability.

  • Analyse a delegated-powers clause by stating who may make rules, the permitted scope, and the procedural and judicial review constraints.

Your checkpoint

A 1,200-word regulatory impact assessment memo for the recommended option, including the chosen legal instrument and a compliance-cost table with three cost categories.

Week 3

Law, Regulation and Regulatory Practice & Public Finance and Budgetary Management

  • Trace a national budget cycle from circular to audit and identify the decision point at which each actor can influence spending.

  • Classify ten expenditure lines by economic and functional category and distinguish recurrent from capital spending.

  • Prepare a budget justification for one programme using activity-based costing and a unit-cost calculation.

  • Interpret a set of financial statements by calculating variance against budget, explaining two material variances and flagging one fiscal risk.

Your checkpoint

A 1,000-word budget brief with a six-line variance table, a unit-cost model and a fiscal-risk paragraph.

Week 4

Public Finance and Budgetary Management & Leadership, People Management and Organisational Performance

  • Build a three-year medium-term expenditure framework for one sector with baseline, ceiling and reprioritisation columns.

  • Convert programme objectives into five SMART performance indicators, each with a data source, baseline and target.

  • Diagnose a team-performance problem using goal clarity, capability, motivation and structure, then select two interventions.

  • Draft a 90-day people plan that assigns accountabilities and sets a feedback cadence.

Your checkpoint

A one-page medium-term expenditure framework summary linked to a KPI dashboard mock-up covering five indicators with baselines and targets.

Week 5

Leadership, People Management and Organisational Performance & Economics and Market Analysis

  • Apply a market-failure taxonomy - public goods, externalities, information asymmetry and market power - to three policy cases and select the matching instrument.

  • Calculate and interpret price elasticity, deadweight loss and tax incidence for a proposed tax or subsidy in a worked example.

  • Diagnose an organisational performance gap using a cause-and-effect chain and propose one measurement that would test the diagnosis.

  • Design a staff engagement intervention with a pre/post measure and a comparison group.

Your checkpoint

A 1,200-word case memo diagnosing one organisational failure, applying one market-failure concept and recommending an intervention with success measures.

Week 6

Governance, Institutional Affairs and Inter-agency Framework & Project, Programme and Change Management

  • Map the constitutional and statutory accountability relationships among ministry, agency, regulator and legislature, and identify three overlap risks.

  • Draft an inter-agency coordination protocol specifying mandate, decision rights, information-sharing and dispute resolution.

  • Build a project logic model from inputs to impact with two assumptions and two risks at each link.

  • Complete a change-readiness assessment across six dimensions and select a sequencing strategy.

Your checkpoint

An integrated project charter for a cross-agency initiative containing a RACI matrix, logic model, risk register of at least five risks and a change-sequencing note.

Week 7

Evidence, Data and Digital Competence & Communication and Stakeholder Engagement

  • Design a mixed-methods evaluation for one programme, specifying indicators, data sources, sampling and a counterfactual option.

  • Clean a dataset, document data-quality issues and produce three charts that answer a stated policy question.

  • Draft a stakeholder communication plan with audience segmentation, key messages, channels and a feedback loop.

  • Prepare and record a two-minute verbal briefing for a minister under time pressure, with three key messages and one explicit ask.

Your checkpoint

A three-chart dashboard plus a two-page stakeholder communication pack including a Q&A anticipation table with five likely questions.

Week 8

Ethics, Integrity and Accountability & Policy Analysis and Policy Formulation

  • Apply a four-test ethics framework - legality, public interest, fairness and transparency - to three integrity dilemmas and justify each decision.

  • Draft answers to two accountability scenarios covering conflict of interest, gift policy and whistleblowing escalation.

  • Sit a full timed mock exam under exam conditions and self-mark against a written rubric.

  • Review the error log and rewrite the five weakest answers into model answers.

Your checkpoint

A full-length timed mock exam, self-scored, with an error log of at least ten entries and five rewritten answers.

Milestones

Week 2: Explain the difference between regulatory impact assessment and cost–benefit analysis in ten minutes without notes, scoring at least 8/10 on a self-made rubric.

Week 4: Pass a closed-book 60-minute section test on Domains 1–3 at 65% or higher, with every incorrect answer logged by cause.

Week 6: From memory, reproduce a one-page governance map of a ministry–agency–regulator triangle showing reporting lines and decision rights, with no more than two errors against notes.

Week 8: Score at least 70% on the full mock exam and show a 20% reduction in repeat error categories compared with the Week 4 test.