Legislative Senior Civil Service Examination flashcards
Legislative Senior Civil Service Examination · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Proportionality test
- A four-step review of state measures: legitimate aim, suitability, necessity (least restrictive means), and balancing. Failure at any step renders the measure unconstitutional or unlawful.
- Wesensgehalt guarantee
- The rule that fundamental rights may be limited only in ways that preserve their essential core. A limitation that empties the right of substance is unconstitutional regardless of the aim.
- Unconstitutional omission
- A finding that the legislature failed to enact a constitutionally mandated protection. The court declares the omission and sets a deadline, but generally leaves drafting to the legislature.
- Vagueness doctrine
- A norm must describe prohibited conduct with enough definiteness that citizens can guide their conduct and officials cannot apply it arbitrarily. Excessive vagueness invalidates the norm.
- Administrative act elements
- Authority, public-law subject matter, external effect, individual case, and regulatory intent. If any element is missing, the act is void rather than merely voidable.
- Void versus voidable act
- A void administrative act has no legal effect from the outset. A merely unlawful act remains effective until it is withdrawn or annulled within the applicable time limit.
- Vorbehalt des Gesetzes
- The requirement that burdensome or rights-affecting administrative action rest on a statutory basis. Without such a basis, the measure lacks legality and is unlawful.
- Discretion review limits
- Courts review discretion for misuse such as bad faith or irrelevant considerations, and for reduction to zero. They do not substitute their own policy judgment for the agency's lawful choice.
- State liability claim
- A compensation claim against the state for unlawful administrative action that breached an official duty owed to the claimant. Fault-based and strict regimes differ by jurisdiction.
- Quorum requirement
- The minimum number of members who must be present for a chamber to validly deliberate and vote. It is usually a majority of statutory members, not of those present.
- Absolute majority
- A voting threshold requiring more than half of the statutory members of the chamber, regardless of how many are present. It is stricter than a simple majority of votes cast.
- Constructive vote of no confidence
- A censure motion that takes effect only if it simultaneously elects a successor head of government. It prevents negative majorities from toppling an executive without forming a new one.
- Three-reading rule
- A procedure requiring the bill to be debated and voted at separate readings, with committee review between them, to ensure deliberation before final adoption.
- Parliamentary immunity
- Non-liability shields members absolutely for votes and statements made in the chamber. Inviolability from arrest is limited and can be waived by the chamber itself.
- Mirror-image rule
- An acceptance must match the offer's terms exactly to form a contract. A modified acceptance is a counter-offer that rejects the original and requires fresh acceptance.
- Res judicata
- A final judgment bars re-litigation of the same claim between the same parties. It requires identity of parties, object, and cause of action.
- Burden of proof
- The claimant proves facts constituting the claim; the defendant proves facts defeating it, such as limitation or performance. Specific doctrines shift this burden in defined cases.
- Limitation period
- The time within which a claim must be brought. A relative period runs from knowledge of damage and debtor; an absolute cut-off runs from the act regardless of knowledge.
- Interim measures
- Provisional attachment, injunction, or seizure granted on a showing of urgency and usually a security deposit. They lapse if the main action is not filed within the statutory period.
- Nullum crimen sine lege
- No punishment without a pre-existing statutory definition of the offense. Analogy to the defendant's detriment is prohibited, and the milder law applies retroactively.
- Dolus eventualis
- A form of intent where the perpetrator foresees the prohibited result as possible and accepts it. It is treated as intent, not negligence, and permits full punishment.
- In dubio pro reo
- The rule that remaining doubt after the evidence is assessed must be resolved in the defendant's favor. It follows from the presumption of innocence and the prosecution's burden.
- Exclusionary rule
- Evidence obtained through torture or serious procedural violation is inadmissible. Derivative evidence may also be excluded depending on attenuation and the seriousness of the violation.
- Voluntary abandonment
- Withdrawal from an attempted offense before completion, without the result occurring, exempts the actor from punishment for the attempt if the withdrawal is voluntary and complete.
- Regulatory impact assessment
- A structured analysis before drafting: problem definition, baseline, options, costs and benefits, distributional effects, and the justified preferred option.
- Delegated legislation limits
- The enabling act must specify the content, purpose, and scope of the delegation. Open-ended delegations without such limits are unconstitutional in most systems.
- Sunset clause
- A provision under which a statute or delegated instrument expires automatically on a stated date unless extended. It forces periodic evaluation and prevents regulatory accretion.
- Duverger's law
- Plurality rule in single-member districts tends to produce two-party competition. Proportional representation tends to produce multiparty systems with coalition governments.
- Semi-presidentialism
- A system with a directly elected president and a prime minister responsible to parliament. Cohabitation arises when the president and parliamentary majority are from different camps.
- Centralized judicial review
- A model in which a single constitutional court has a monopoly on reviewing statutes. Ordinary courts may refer questions but cannot themselves refuse to apply a law.
- Budget universality
- The principle that all revenues and expenditures appear gross in the budget, without netting. It preserves transparency and prevents hidden spending.
- Discharge procedure
- The legislature's formal approval of the executive's budget execution, based on the supreme audit institution's report. Refusal signals accountability failure and may have political consequences.