Sale-and-leaseback valuation after a condition survey
An operator is negotiating a sale-and-leaseback of 45 trams with an average age of 14 years, a design life of 30 years and 2.1 million km. The lessor's valuer asks you to support the asset valuation. A condition survey of a 15% sample finds corrosion in the sill beam beyond the allowable limit on 4 of 7 sampled cars, one car with a 35 mm fatigue crack in the bogie bolster, and records showing the last heavy overhaul was deferred by 18 months on 12 cars. The operator's book value is EUR 96 million; the lessor's indicative market value is EUR 72 million. The operator proposes to repair the four corroded cars and sell at the indicative value, arguing that the sample is not representative. The sale must close in six weeks.
1. How should the valuation be adjusted, and is the 15% sample adequate?
Read the worked answer
The sample is not adequate to support the indicative value. Seven cars out of 45 is a 15% sample, but finding corrosion beyond the allowable limit on 4 of 7 suggests a prevalence that could be 30-60% with wide confidence limits. For a sale-and-leaseback, the valuer should either inspect 100% of the cars or use a statistically defensible stratified sample with the corrosion findings treated as a population risk.
The valuation should start from the income or market approach, then deduct the cost of repairing the corroded sill beams, the cost of the deferred heavy overhaul on 12 cars, and a risk allowance for the fatigue crack and possible fleet-wide issues. The EUR 72 million indicative value should be presented as conditional, with a holdback or price adjustment mechanism, until the inspection is complete.
2. Would you accept the proposed repair of the four corroded cars? What conditions apply?
Read the worked answer
Not as a cosmetic repair. Corrosion in the sill beam is a structural issue, so the repair must be approved by the design authority or a competent engineer against the original design and the applicable structural standard. The repair procedure should include removal of the corroded material, weld procedure qualification, welder qualification, post-weld treatment if required, restoration of corrosion protection, and NDT of the repaired area. A fatigue assessment should confirm that the repair does not create a stress concentration, and the repair should be recorded in the vehicle history.
The 35 mm crack in the bogie bolster is more serious: it requires immediate withdrawal of that car, a design authority assessment, and NDT of the same detail on the rest of the fleet. Acceptance of the repair should be conditional on these records being available before closure.
3. How should the deferred overhaul affect the valuation and the disclosure?
Read the worked answer
The deferred overhaul is a known cost and a risk. The valuer should obtain the overhaul specification, the remaining interval to the next heavy overhaul, and the cost per car; 12 cars deferred by 18 months means the lessor will inherit the cost earlier than the base case. The valuation should deduct the present value of that cost, and the sale agreement should disclose the deferral and allocate responsibility.
If the deferral was approved by the safety authority with a risk assessment, the documents should be in the data room; if not, it is an open compliance issue. The fatigue crack also changes the risk profile: the lessor should require a fleet-wide inspection before closing. With a six-week deadline, the practical answer is a conditional valuation and an escrow, not a clean opinion.