Revising an extension request email
At a Kuwaiti university, a first-year student drafts an email to Professor Al-Sabah requesting a 48-hour extension on a group report due Monday at 9 a.m. The draft reads: 'Dear Professor, I am writing to ask for an extension for the assignment due on Monday. Me and my group have been working on the survey, however the data is not ready. Can you give us more time? We have a doctor’s note because my teammate’s father was hospitalized.' The syllabus says extension requests must be submitted at least 48 hours before the deadline and require documentation for medical or family emergencies. The student is sending the email Sunday at 10 a.m., 23 hours before the deadline. The professor is known for strict deadlines but has approved documented family emergencies before. The student wants to mention the note without sharing private medical details. A writing tutor has 15 minutes to review the draft and must decide what to fix first: grammar, register, or the timing problem.
1. Identify two grammar or usage errors in the draft and correct them, explaining the rule briefly.
Read the worked answer
Error 1: 'Me and my group have been working...' → 'My group and I have been working...'. Use the subject pronoun 'I', not the object pronoun 'me', and place others first as a matter of courtesy. Error 2: '...on the survey, however the data is not ready.' → '...on the survey; however, the data is not ready.' The original joins two independent clauses with a comma, creating a comma splice. A semicolon before 'however' and a comma after it fixes the punctuation. Minor consistency point: the draft says 'assignment' and then 'report'; choose one term so the professor can identify the item immediately.
2. Rewrite the request sentence 'Can you give us more time?' in a formal academic register that fits the syllabus.
Read the worked answer
Revision: 'Would it be possible to grant a 48-hour extension, until Wednesday at 9 a.m.?' Reasoning: The modal 'would' is more formal than 'can'; the request names the exact extension and new deadline, so the professor does not have to negotiate the terms. It also avoids the vague 'more time', which could mean anything from one hour to a week. The sentence remains polite without being obsequious.
3. Advise the student on timing and evidence: what should be mentioned, what omitted, and what is the main risk?
Read the worked answer
Main risk: timing. The email is sent 23 hours before the deadline, while the syllabus requires 48 hours. The student should acknowledge this directly and apologize rather than hide it. Mention: the documented family emergency, the doctor’s note as an attachment, the requested new deadline, and a concrete plan for submitting the report. Omit: the teammate’s father’s diagnosis or any private medical detail; the note is enough unless the professor asks for more. The student should also get the teammate’s permission before naming the hospitalized relative. Best structure: brief apology for late notice, reason, evidence attached, specific request, offer to submit partial work. This addresses the timing problem instead of fixing only grammar.