Group Chat and a Closed-Book Exam
During week 8 of the academy, an instructor discovers that several cadets in a 12-person study group used a group chat to share answers to a closed-book legal exam. One cadet copied a paragraph word-for-word; another only read the chat but did not use it; a third reported the chat to the instructor. The academy's honor policy permits group study but prohibits sharing or receiving live exam content. The cadets signed the honor statement at entry. The instructor must decide how to handle the report, what evidence to preserve, and whether sanctions should differ among the three cadets. The next exam is in three days, and the class is already under stress after a difficult week.
1. What should the instructor do in the first 24 hours after receiving the report?
Read the worked answer
Preserve the chat, the exam, the cadet's answer sheet, and the honor statement before anyone deletes anything. Notify the academy commander or honor board according to policy and keep the initial inquiry confidential. Interview the cadets separately, starting with the reporter, and ask open questions about who shared, who received, and who used the content. Do not treat all 12 group members identically: the cadet who copied the paragraph, the cadet who read but did not use the chat, and the reporter have different levels of involvement. The instructor should avoid announcing a conclusion before the evidence is reviewed and should document the chain of custody for the chat records.
2. How should the instructor distinguish among the three cadets when recommending sanctions?
Read the worked answer
Sanctions should track the policy's definitions and the evidence. Copying a live exam answer is a clear violation and supports a formal honor charge. Merely reading a chat without using it may still violate a duty to report or a prohibition on receiving exam content, but it is less culpable and may support counseling or a lesser charge. The reporter should not be punished for reporting in good faith and should be protected from retaliation. The board should consider intent, whether the cadet sought the content, whether the cadet cooperated, and any prior honor violations. Because the next exam is in three days, the instructor should also recommend a secure testing procedure and a reminder of the honor policy, not a rushed mass punishment.