PPL Human Performance and Limitations study materials
PPL Human Performance and Limitations study resources

A More Experienced Passenger Takes Over

PPL Human Performance and Limitations · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A More Experienced Passenger Takes Over

A low-hours private pilot is flying a rented Cessna 172 with a friend who is a commercial pilot and flight instructor. The friend sits in the right seat. During cruise at 4,500 ft, the friend points out a nearby aircraft and suggests a turn to the right. The pilot had already seen the traffic and is about to turn left according to the flight plan. The friend then says, 'I would have done that differently; you should let me handle the radio.' The pilot feels pressured and starts to second-guess every decision. Later, the friend switches the radio frequency without telling the pilot. The pilot misses a position report and the controller asks for a repeat. A passenger in the back is talking loudly. The pilot is now unsure who is in command.

1. Identify the CRM/SRM issues in this scenario.

Read the worked answer

The main issue is unclear roles and authority. The pilot is the PIC, but the friend acts as if he is in charge, giving commands and changing the radio frequency without coordination. This undermines the pilot's command and creates confusion. The friend's comment 'you should let me handle the radio' is a communication breakdown; it is not a briefing or a request. The pilot's second-guessing and loss of confidence show a lack of assertiveness.

The loud passenger in the back adds distraction. There is no sterile cockpit for critical phases. SRM is also poor: the pilot has not set personal limits or a clear plan for who does what. The result is a fragmented cockpit with no shared mental model.

2. What should the pilot do to re-establish command and communication?

Read the worked answer

He should calmly but firmly state that he is the PIC and that he will make the decisions. He should brief the friend: 'Please do not change frequencies without telling me; if you see traffic, call it out, but I will decide the turn.' He should use 'I' statements to avoid sounding aggressive. He should ask the passenger in the back to be quiet during radio calls and critical phases.

He should confirm the current frequency and make the missed position report. If the friend continues to interfere, the pilot should consider landing or asking the friend to stop. The goal is to restore a shared plan, not to win an argument. Assertiveness is a safety tool.

3. How could this have been prevented?

Read the worked answer

A pre-flight briefing should have established roles: who is PIC, who handles radio, how traffic calls will be made, and when the cockpit will be sterile. The pilot should have told the friend that he is welcome to advise but not to act. He should have briefed the passenger about noise. He could also have flown alone or with a non-pilot passenger to avoid role confusion.

Training in assertiveness and SRM would help the pilot recognise the pressure earlier. The friend's experience should be a resource, not a substitute for command. Clear communication before take-off is the best defence.