Going Concern at Ruhuna Tiles PLC
Ruhuna Tiles PLC has net current liabilities of LKR 420 million at year-end and a bank loan of LKR 600 million due in eight months. The company breached its interest cover covenant at the reporting date; the bank has given a written waiver valid until three months after the reporting date, but has not agreed to renew the facility. Management has prepared a cash flow forecast showing that a LKR 250 million rights issue, to be completed in five months, will restore liquidity. The largest shareholder, holding 52%, has signed a non-binding letter of support. Sales have fallen 18% and a key customer, representing 22% of revenue, has moved to a competitor. The company has agreed a 60-day extension with suppliers. The audit partner is under pressure to sign before the AGM. The forecast assumes a 12% price increase and a 15% growth in volume, despite market data showing a decline. The company has no overdraft headroom.
1. Evaluate management's going concern assessment and identify the indicators that raise doubt about the company's ability to continue.
Read the worked answer
Going concern requires an assessment of at least twelve months from the reporting date. The indicators here are serious. Net current liabilities of LKR 420 million and a LKR 600 million loan due in eight months create a refinancing requirement before the assessment period ends. The covenant breach shows that the lender could demand repayment, and the waiver covers only three months after the reporting date, with no renewal agreed. That is short cover, not a solution.
The LKR 250 million rights issue is not yet completed, is five months away, and has no binding underwriting. The 52% shareholder's support letter is non-binding, so it cannot be relied on as strong evidence. The 60-day supplier extension improves cash temporarily but signals supplier concern. Sales are down 18%, a customer representing 22% of revenue has left, and there is no overdraft headroom. The forecast assumes a 12% price increase and 15% volume growth while the market is declining; those assumptions are not supportable without evidence. Management's conclusion that the company is a going concern is therefore not adequately supported. A material uncertainty exists unless binding finance and credible operating improvements are obtained.
2. Design audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence on going concern. Include procedures on the forecast, the waiver, and the support letter.
Read the worked answer
The auditor should obtain the cash flow forecast and test its mathematical accuracy, then challenge the assumptions. Compare the 12% price increase and 15% volume growth with historical results, market data, budgets, and post-year-end sales. Perform sensitivity and downside scenarios, including no rights issue and no waiver renewal, and assess the resulting liquidity gap. Review board minutes and management reports for evidence of planned actions.
For the waiver, inspect the signed bank letter, confirm its terms directly with the bank, and assess whether it is legally enforceable and whether any conditions remain unmet. Check whether the breach triggers cross-defaults on other loans. For the rights issue, inspect the offer document, underwriting agreement, shareholder approvals, regulatory approvals, and any subscriptions received after year-end. For the support letter, assess the shareholder's financial capacity, whether the letter is binding, and whether it covers the full twelve-month period.
Other procedures include confirming supplier extensions, reviewing subsequent cash receipts and bank statements, inquiring of legal counsel, and obtaining written representations. The auditor should evaluate management's disclosure of the material uncertainty and consider whether the going concern basis remains appropriate. The AGM deadline is not a reason to reduce procedures.
3. Discuss the implications for the audit report if the going concern uncertainty remains unresolved, including the effect of inadequate disclosure.
Read the worked answer
If the auditor concludes that a material uncertainty exists but management has disclosed it adequately, the opinion can be unmodified. The auditor's report must include a separate section headed Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern, explaining the uncertainty and referring to the relevant note. That section is not a qualification. A key audit matter may also be reported, but it should not duplicate the going concern section unnecessarily.
If the disclosure is inadequate, the auditor should issue a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion, depending on how pervasive the misstatement is. If management's use of the going concern basis is inappropriate, an adverse opinion is required. If the auditor cannot obtain sufficient evidence, a disclaimer of opinion is required. The auditor should communicate the conclusion to those charged with governance before signing and consider the effect on other information in the annual report.
The auditor should not sign merely because the AGM is near. If the rights issue, waiver, or support letter remains unconfirmed, the auditor should extend procedures, request further evidence, or qualify the report. The report should be clear that the material uncertainty relates to the entity's ability to continue, not to a disagreement about accounting policy.