Interpreter, Exposure, and Family Decision-Making
A 34-year-old Afghan woman, Farida, was referred by her primary care physician for PTSD after arriving in the U.S. 18 months ago. She reports nightmares, hypervigilance, and avoidance of crowded places; she witnessed a bombing and lost a brother. She speaks Dari; her English is limited. Her 12-year-old son, Sami, has interpreted at all six sessions because the clinic's interpreter service has a four-week wait and the family declined a phone interpreter, saying 'family matters stay in the family.' Farida's husband attends occasionally and answers questions directed to her. You are planning trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy with imaginal exposure. Farida says she will agree to whatever her husband and eldest son decide. She also reports that Sami has begun wetting the bed and refusing to go to school.
1. Evaluate the use of Sami as the interpreter and explain what you should do.
Read the worked answer
Using a 12-year-old child as the interpreter is not an acceptable long-term arrangement. It places Sami in an adult role, may distort or omit traumatic content, breaches Farida's privacy, and exposes Sami to details that can worsen his own symptoms. It also creates a conflict of interest because Sami may soften or edit what his mother says to protect her or the family. The clinic has a duty to provide meaningful language access; a four-week wait does not justify using a child when telephone or video interpretation can be arranged sooner. Do not continue trauma processing through Sami. Explain to the family, without blaming them, that accurate interpretation protects Farida and Sami, and that a qualified interpreter is part of good care. Arrange a professional Dari interpreter, document the change, and offer Sami a referral for his own assessment. If the family refuses all interpreters, consult a supervisor and document the barrier and your efforts.
2. How should cultural context and family decision-making shape your assessment and treatment plan?
Read the worked answer
Cultural humility means asking about Farida's own explanation of her symptoms, her beliefs about trauma and treatment, and the family's decision-making norms rather than assuming individual autonomy is the only healthy model. In many collectivist families, involving the husband or eldest son in decisions is expected and can support engagement. At the same time, Farida is the client and must give her own informed consent. Use a professional interpreter to speak with her directly and privately at least part of the time, and ask whether she wants her husband included. Explore practical barriers, stigma, religious or community supports, and safety. Adapt trauma-focused CBT pacing and language to her idiom of distress, and avoid interpreting avoidance as resistance. Clarify confidentiality and its limits with the family. The plan should honor family involvement while ensuring Farida's voice and consent remain central.
3. What should you do about Sami's bedwetting and school refusal?
Read the worked answer
Sami's symptoms warrant attention, but he is not your client and you should not treat him through Farida's sessions. Discuss the concerns with Farida and, with appropriate consent, refer Sami to a child counselor or pediatrician for assessment. Psychoeducation can help the parents understand that children who interpret traumatic material may develop distress, but avoid blaming them. Screen for abuse, neglect, or family violence because a child's symptoms can signal safety concerns; if you have reasonable suspicion of abuse or neglect, follow mandated reporting law. Do not use Sami as an interpreter in any discussion about his own symptoms. Coordinate with the new provider only with signed releases. Document the referral and the rationale so the family's care remains coordinated without making Sami responsible for adult information.