MBE flashcards
MBE · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Complete diversity
- For diversity jurisdiction, no plaintiff may share state citizenship with any defendant; minimal diversity is insufficient, and citizenship is determined at filing.
- Amount in controversy
- Diversity jurisdiction requires the amount in controversy to exceed $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; the plaintiff's good-faith claim generally controls unless legally impossible.
- Erie doctrine
- In diversity cases, federal courts apply state substantive law and federal procedural law; a valid Federal Rule governs if it is arguably procedural and within the Rules Enabling Act.
- Claim preclusion
- A final judgment on the merits bars a later suit on the same claim by the same parties or their privies, including claims that could have been raised.
- Removal deadline
- A defendant generally must file a notice of removal within 30 days after receiving the initial pleading; diversity removal also requires that no properly joined defendant is a citizen of the forum state.
- Standing injury in fact
- Constitutional standing requires a concrete and particularized injury that is actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical, plus causation and redressability.
- Dormant Commerce Clause
- State laws discriminating against interstate commerce are presumptively invalid unless they serve a legitimate local purpose that cannot be achieved by reasonable nondiscriminatory means.
- Strict scrutiny
- Content-based speech regulations and fundamental-right or suspect-class classifications must serve a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored to be the least restrictive means.
- State action doctrine
- The Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection and due process guarantees generally require government action; private conduct is not actionable unless sufficiently entangled with the state.
- Regulatory taking
- A regulation that denies all economically beneficial use is a per se taking; otherwise courts weigh economic impact, investment-backed expectations, and character of the government action.
- UCC firm offer
- A merchant's signed writing that gives assurance an offer will be held open is irrevocable without consideration for the stated time or a reasonable time, up to three months.
- Statute of Frauds categories
- Writing is required for promises involving marriage, performance over one year, land, executor liability, surety, and sale of goods of $500 or more.
- Perfect tender rule
- Under UCC Article 2, the seller must deliver goods and tender exactly conforming to the contract; if not, buyer may reject, subject to seller's right to cure.
- Expectation damages
- Contract damages place the injured party in the position performance would have produced, including lost profits, but exclude damages not foreseeable at contract formation.
- Felony murder
- A killing committed during an inherently dangerous felony, such as burglary, robbery, rape, or arson, is murder; liability is limited by proximate cause and agency rules.
- Miranda custody
- Miranda warnings are required before custodial interrogation; custody exists when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, and interrogation includes words likely to elicit incriminating responses.
- Larceny elements
- Larceny is the trespassory taking and carrying away of another's personal property with intent to permanently deprive; taking from possession, not mere custody, is required.
- Terry stop
- Police may briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and may frisk for weapons if they reasonably suspect the person is armed and dangerous.
- Attempt substantial step
- Attempt requires intent to commit the target crime plus an act constituting a substantial step strongly corroborative of that intent; mere preparation is insufficient.
- Hearsay definition
- Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted; statements offered for effect on the listener or as verbal acts are nonhearsay.
- Excited utterance
- A statement relating to a startling event, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement, is admissible hearsay regardless of declarant availability.
- MIMIC character evidence
- In criminal cases, evidence of prior acts may be admitted for motive, intent, absence of mistake, identity, or common plan, but not to prove propensity.
- Best evidence rule
- An original writing, recording, or photograph is required to prove its content, unless an exception such as lost originals or collateral matter applies.
- Confrontation testimonial
- Testimonial hearsay is inadmissible unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine, absent forfeiture.
- Joint tenancy unities
- Joint tenants hold equal shares with right of survivorship and must satisfy the four unities of time, title, interest, and possession; severance destroys survivorship.
- Adverse possession elements
- Title by adverse possession requires actual, open and notorious, exclusive, continuous possession that is hostile to the owner for the statutory period.
- Recording act BFP
- A bona fide purchaser for value without notice of a prior interest prevails under notice and race-notice statutes; race statutes protect the first to record regardless of notice.
- Covenant running with land
- A real covenant binds successors when there is writing, intent, touch and concern, horizontal and vertical privity, and notice; equitable servitudes require no privity for injunction.
- Res ipsa loquitur
- Negligence may be inferred when the injury-causing accident is of a kind that ordinarily does not occur without negligence, caused by an instrumentality in defendant's exclusive control.
- Proximate cause
- Proximate cause requires that the harm be a foreseeable result of the defendant's negligence; unforeseeable intervening causes supersede, while foreseeable negligence or rescue attempts do not.
- Products strict liability
- A seller of a defective product is strictly liable for physical harm if the defect existed when sold and made the product unreasonably dangerous, and the plaintiff was a foreseeable user.
- Defamation actual malice
- A public official or public figure must prove the defendant made a defamatory statement with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.