The “Pimple” That Has Been There Since Spring
A 58-year-old regular client comes in for her monthly facial. During cleansing she says, “There's a pimple by my ear that won't go away - it's been there since spring, and sometimes it bleeds when I wash my face.” Under the mag lamp it is a 6-mm pearly papule with a rolled edge, a few fine visible vessels, and a small central crust. There is no central pore, and it does not resemble her usual comedones. She takes metformin and warfarin; her A1c was 8.9% last month. She wants you to “get it out” before her grandson's graduation on Saturday, and she also wants the closed comedones on her chin extracted.
1. What is your plan for the ear lesion, and which specific features drive that plan?
Read the worked answer
Plan: do not touch it. No squeezing, no lancet, no extraction, no exfoliation over it, no product on it, no “just seeing what comes out.” Then document it precisely and refer her, in writing, to a dermatologist - promptly, within a couple of weeks, not “next time you're in.”
The features that drive this:
- Pearly/translucent appearance with a rolled border - classic morphology for basal cell carcinoma.
- Visible fine vessels (telangiectasia) across the surface.
- Central crust and a history of bleeding with ordinary washing - the lesion is eroding; this is not a comedo.
- Chronicity - months, not days. Inflammatory acne resolves or changes; this has not.
- No central pore. A comedo or cyst has a follicular opening. This doesn't.
- Older adult, sun-exposed site (periauricular/cheek).
Reasoning about urgency: BCC is slow-growing and rarely metastasizes, so this is not an emergency-room call - but it is locally destructive, and a lesion that bleeds with washing has already begun to erode. That earns a prompt referral, not reassurance. Squamous cell carcinoma and other lesions belong on the differential too; the point isn't the specific diagnosis, it's that this is not an esthetician's lesion to treat.
The words I avoid: “That looks like cancer.” I am not licensed to diagnose, and saying so alarms without helping. I describe, I decline to treat, and I refer.
2. Do you extract the chin comedones? Reason through the diabetes, the warfarin, and her healing, and say what you would and would not do.
Read the worked answer
What the two conditions actually mean:
- A1c 8.9% - poor glycemic control impairs neutrophil function, collagen synthesis, and microcirculation. Wounds heal more slowly and infection risk is meaningfully higher. An extraction that would be trivial on another client can become an inflamed, slow-healing papule on her.
- Warfarin - anticoagulated, so any pressure that ruptures a vessel produces bruising or a hematoma that she will notice and attribute to me. Bruising on a 58-year-old neck-and-chin area before a graduation is a bad outcome even when nothing "went wrong."
- Combined: the risk isn't the extraction technique, it's the host.
What I would do: gentle cleansing, soft masking, hydration, and - only for clearly open, non-inflamed comedones - very light pressure, stopping the instant there is resistance. I tell her in advance that she may bruise, and I get her agreement to that before I start.
What I would not do: deep or forceful extraction, lancing anything inflamed, or working on multiple sites “while I'm here.” I would not treat if she reports easy bruising, a recent INR change, or an upcoming procedure.
The honest option I offer her: defer the extractions to a visit at least two weeks before any event she cares about, or skip them entirely and let the facial be about hydration. Aesthetic benefit here is small; the downside is a bruise she'll wear to a graduation and a story about the esthetician who did it. That trade isn't close.
3. Write the chart documentation for this visit and a script for telling her. Include what you may and may not say.
Read the worked answer
Documentation (objective, no diagnosis):
- Location, size (6 mm), color, elevation, border description, presence of telangiectasia, central crust.
- “Does not resemble surrounding comedones; no central pore.”
- “Client reports lesion present since spring and intermittent bleeding with washing.”
- “Lesion not treated, manipulated, or exfoliated. No product applied.”
- “Advised dermatologic evaluation; written referral provided; client verbalized understanding.”
- Date, time, my name and license number, signature.
- I write “suspicious lesion - referred,” not “BCC,” “cancer,” or “melanoma.” A diagnosis in an esthetician's chart is outside my scope and creates liability rather than protection.
Script: “I'm not able to diagnose skin growths - that's outside what my license lets me do - but this isn't acting like a pimple. It's been there for months and it bleeds when you wash, so it needs a dermatologist's eyes, this week if you can get in. I'm going to write down exactly what I see and when, and you can hand that note to them. I'm not going to squeeze it - squeezing something I can't identify isn't fair to you.”
Then: hand her the written note, offer to help her find a provider, and note in the chart that she left with it. Do not soften it into “probably nothing” - that sentence is what delays a diagnosis by a year.