Michigan OT Jurisprudence study materials
Michigan OT Jurisprudence study resources

Michigan OT Jurisprudence: Occupational Therapists General Rules

Michigan OT Jurisprudence · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Occupational Therapists General Rules

Domain 2: Occupational Therapists General Rules

This domain tests the administrative rules that fill in daily practice standards: supervision, documentation, professional conduct, and competent use of modalities. The General Rules are enforced through the Public Health Code; a license can be disciplined for violating them.

Supervision and delegation

  • The supervising OT must authorize services, remain available for consultation, and evaluate the OTA's performance; the rule set distinguishes direct/on-site supervision from general supervision rather than allowing unsupervised practice.
  • OTAs may implement delegated interventions but may not evaluate, interpret data, plan treatment, or discharge.
  • Students and unlicensed aides cannot be used as substitute staff; the supervising therapist retains responsibility for the plan and for services delivered.

Records and conduct

  • Documentation must be accurate, timely, and confidentiality-protected; falsifying or altering records is unprofessional conduct.
  • Practice only within competence and scope; obtain informed consent; do not misrepresent credentials; comply with mandatory reporting obligations.
  • Use physical agent modalities only with appropriate education and training and according to the rules; follow infection control requirements.

Worked example

An OTA changes a treatment goal without consulting the OT because the patient "seems ready." Under the General Rules, the OTA may report progress and suggest a change, but the OT must evaluate and revise the plan. The OT's supervision duty includes approving goals; the OTA's action exceeds delegated treatment implementation.

Traps

  • Assuming "general supervision" means no supervision.
  • Letting an OTA complete discharge summaries or initial evaluations.
  • Backdating notes or documenting before treatment.
  • Ignoring reporting duties or practicing outside competence.
  • Treating continuing education and credential requirements as administrative afterthoughts.