MI Security Guard study materials
MI Security Guard study resources

MI Security Guard: Report Writing, Observation, and Emergency Response

MI Security Guard · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Report Writing, Observation, and Emergency Response

This domain tests whether you can document an incident accurately and respond safely to an emergency. Reports are often the evidence that decides a civil claim, a criminal case, or an employment dispute. The exam looks for objective facts, a clear timeline, accurate identification, preserved evidence, and appropriate emergency action. A guard’s report should let a reader who was not present understand what happened without adopting the guard’s conclusions.

Core practices

  • Record who, what, when, where, how, and who else was present. Use 24-hour time or clearly mark a.m./p.m.
  • Separate observation from opinion. Write “I saw a red mark on the left forearm” rather than “he was obviously abused.” Quote statements verbatim when possible and identify the speaker.
  • Document actions taken, witnesses, video locations, and whether police or EMS were called. Note the disposition: transported, arrested, released, or referred.
  • Write promptly, sign and date the report, and do not alter a submitted report. Corrections should be made by a supplemental report.
  • In an emergency, scene safety comes first: call 911, give the location and nature of the emergency, and provide first aid or CPR only within your training. Secure the area without contaminating evidence.

Worked example

A customer slips near a wet floor. The guard should not write “the store was negligent.” The guard should write: “At 14:05 I observed a customer lying on the floor near aisle 4. A yellow cone was 3 feet away. I called 911 at 14:06 and asked another employee to bring a first-aid kit. I did not move the customer. I photographed the floor and cone before cleanup.” That record is factual and preserves the key issues.

Traps that cost marks

Conclusions instead of observations; omitting the time police were called; describing hearsay as fact; failing to note evidence preservation; and rewriting an original report after submission.