CNFE study plan
CNFE · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Network Protocols and Traffic Analysis & Network Forensics Fundamentals and Legal Considerations
Map each of the seven OSI layers to the specific packet fields and protocol behaviors a forensic analyst reads (Ethernet/ARP at L2, IP/ICMP at L3, TCP/UDP at L4, DNS/HTTP/TLS at L5-7)
Dissect TCP three-way handshake, sequence/acknowledgment numbers, and flag combinations by hand from a raw capture, then explain how retransmissions, resets, and half-open scans appear in flow records
Identify chain-of-custody requirements, order-of-volatility principles, and the difference between consent, subpoena, and warrant-based acquisition in a network context
Explain how Fourth Amendment reasonable-expectation-of-privacy analysis and organizational acceptable-use policies affect whether packet capture is lawful in an employer-owned network
Your checkpoint
A one-page protocol-to-evidence reference table covering L2-L7 fields plus a 300-word memo on lawful capture authority in a workplace investigation
Network Protocols and Traffic Analysis & Malware Traffic Analysis and Indicators of Compromise
Reconstruct a full DNS resolution chain from a capture, distinguishing recursive resolver queries, authoritative responses, NXDOMAIN, and tunneling indicators such as high-entropy subdomains and TXT-record abuse
Analyze HTTP request/response pairs to extract User-Agent strings, URI paths, POST bodies, and cookie/session artifacts that reveal attacker tooling
Explain how TLS metadata (SNI, certificate subject, JA3/JA3S fingerprints, cipher suites) supports attribution when payloads are encrypted
Compare DHCP, NTP, SMB, and RDP traffic patterns and describe which artifacts each leaves that survive in logs or captures
Your checkpoint
An annotated packet walkthrough of a single simulated session from DHCP lease through DNS lookup to TLS handshake, citing at least 12 specific fields
Evidence Acquisition and Packet Capture & Forensic Tools and Techniques
Configure a span/mirror port and a network TAP in a lab, documenting the tradeoffs of each in terms of dropped frames, duplex behavior, and evidentiary defensibility
Set capture filters versus display filters in Wireshark and tcpdump, and demonstrate how to size a ring buffer with multiple files to avoid packet loss during long acquisitions
Compute and verify SHA-256 hashes of capture files at acquisition, transfer, and analysis stages to prove integrity
Apply a tool-selection framework that weighs licensing, hash verification, timestamp handling, and output reproducibility across Wireshark, tcpdump, Zeek, and NetworkMiner
Your checkpoint
A captured pcap with a hash log documenting acquisition, transfer, and re-verification, plus a 200-word note on why the chosen capture method would withstand challenge
Malware Traffic Analysis and Indicators of Compromise & Intrusion Detection and Log Analysis
Extract indicators of compromise from malware traffic: beaconing intervals with jitter, DGA-like domain patterns, fast-flux DNS, and asymmetric upload/download byte ratios
Correlate IDS alerts from Snort/Suricata signatures with the underlying packets to separate true positives from noise, and write one custom rule that detects a specific behavior rather than a static string
Parse firewall, proxy, and DNS server logs to build a timeline of a single host's outbound connections
Explain how beacon jitter and sleep timers create detectable periodicity, and calculate inter-arrival statistics from a capture
Your checkpoint
An IOC package for one simulated malware family: extracted domains, IPs, JA3 hash, beacon interval, and a matching IDS rule
Incident Response and Network Investigation & Intrusion Detection and Log Analysis
Apply the NIST SP 800-61 incident response lifecycle to a network intrusion scenario, writing containment options (host isolation, ACL block, DNS sinkhole) with their tradeoffs
Build a log-analysis workflow that normalizes timestamps across time zones and clock skew before correlating events from multiple sources
Draft the scoping questions an investigator must answer first: initial access vector, dwell time, lateral movement path, and data exfiltration volume
Practice live-response triage order on a networked host: volatile memory, active connections, ARP cache, then disk
Your checkpoint
A written incident timeline for a multi-stage intrusion with at least 15 timestamped events and a containment recommendation
Network Forensics Fundamentals and Legal Considerations & Reporting, Documentation, and Expert Testimony
Document an examination so a third party could reproduce it: scope, tools and versions, commands run, hashes, and deviations from plan
Draft findings that separate observed fact from analyst inference, using language that survives cross-examination
Explain admissibility standards (relevance, authenticity, hearsay exceptions for business records, Daubert-style reliability factors) as they apply to network evidence
Anticipate and answer three likely cross-examination challenges to a packet-capture-based conclusion
Your checkpoint
A mock expert report of 600-900 words on the week 5 incident, including methodology, findings, limitations, and an appendix listing every hash
Malware Traffic Analysis and Indicators of Compromise & Network Protocols and Traffic Analysis
Analyze an encrypted-traffic scenario using only metadata to infer command-and-control activity, documenting the reasoning chain
Identify protocol-anomaly indicators such as non-standard ports carrying standard protocols, malformed headers, and unexpected protocol sequencing
Compare exfiltration channels (DNS tunneling, HTTPS POST, ICMP payloads) and describe the artifact signature of each
Review your week 4 IOC package against new traffic and revise any indicator that produced false positives
Your checkpoint
A metadata-only analysis memo identifying one C2 channel with three independent supporting artifacts
Forensic Tools and Techniques & Network Forensics Fundamentals and Legal Considerations & Reporting, Documentation, and Expert Testimony
Run a full timed practice examination under test conditions and score it by domain to locate remaining weak areas
Re-drill the two lowest-scoring domains using targeted labs rather than rereading notes
Assemble a one-page exam-day reference of legal standards, volatile-order rules, and hash-verification steps
Finalize a personal tool and command cheat sheet you can recall without reference material
Your checkpoint
A scored practice exam with a written remediation list for any domain below 70 percent
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain, without notes, how a single DNS query and its response appear at the packet level and which fields an investigator would cite as evidence
Week 4: Produced a complete IOC package from a capture and defended each indicator against a false-positive challenge
Week 6: Completed a mock expert report that a peer can follow to reproduce the analysis from hashes alone
Week 8: Scored at or above 80 percent overall on a timed practice exam with no domain below 70 percent