MN Psych Juris study materials
MN Psych Juris study resources

Case Study 3: Rural Bartering and a Graduation Invitation

MN Psych Juris · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Case Study 3: Rural Bartering and a Graduation Invitation

You are the only licensed psychologist in a town of 4,200, 65 miles from the nearest city. Your client Sam, 41, owns the local hardware store and has a $1,200 outstanding therapy balance after a job loss. Sam offers to install a new water heater at your home, which would normally cost about $1,100, in exchange for forgiveness of the balance and eight future sessions. You need a water heater, and Sam is licensed and insured. Sam also invites you to his daughter's high school graduation party next month and says everyone in town will be there. You have been treating Sam for 10 sessions for panic disorder; he is improving. There is no other therapist within 50 miles who accepts his insurance, and he says he cannot pay cash. You have a sliding-fee scale but it is full.

1. Evaluate the proposed barter and the graduation invitation under Minnesota ethics and boundary rules. What do you do?

Read the worked answer

Bartering is not automatically prohibited, but it is high-risk. Board ethics and APA Ethical Standard 6.05 permit barter only when it is not clinically contraindicated, not exploitative, and culturally appropriate; it requires a written agreement, fair valuation, and a plan to avoid abandonment. Here, Sam is a current client with an unpaid balance and a power differential; accepting plumbing work at your home creates a personal and financial relationship that can distort therapy. The safer course is to decline the barter, explore a payment plan, reduced fee, pro bono sessions, telehealth, or a referral, and document the options. The graduation invitation is a separate boundary issue. Politely decline and discuss what the invitation means in treatment. If you ever considered barter, get consultation, use independent valuation, and put safeguards in writing, but this fact pattern favors declining.

2. How would you handle termination or referral if no affordable option remains?

Read the worked answer

Do not simply terminate because Sam cannot pay. Abandonment is an ethics risk. Offer a written payment plan, apply the sliding scale when possible, seek a community or telehealth referral, and give enough notice for continuity. Provide records and a summary with authorization. Document the financial discussion and the clinical rationale. If you refer, confirm the new provider accepts him and schedule a transition. If no affordable option exists, consult the Board or an ethics attorney about how to proceed without abandonment.