MoP Foundation flashcards
MoP Foundation · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- MoP seven principles
- Senior management commitment, governance alignment, strategy alignment, portfolio office, energized change culture, resource management and capacity management. They are universal, self-validating and empowering, guiding how portfolio management is applied.
- MoP five practices
- Portfolio management framework, portfolio management office, portfolio strategy, portfolio delivery and portfolio management. Each practice is supported by techniques and together they form the continuous management cycle.
- Portfolio definition cycle steps
- Understand, categorize, prioritize, balance and plan. The cycle captures the current portfolio and strategy, groups investments, ranks them, adjusts the mix and produces the portfolio delivery plan.
- Portfolio versus programme versus project
- A project delivers defined outputs within constraints; a programme delivers outcomes through coordinated projects; a portfolio is the totality of investment in change delivering strategic objectives, managed through selection and balance.
- Portfolio management definition
- A coordinated collection of strategic processes and decisions that together enable the most effective balance of organizational change and business-as-usual, focused on investment selection, prioritization and balance rather than delivery of individual projects.
- Understand step purpose
- The first portfolio definition step: capture the current portfolio of investments and the strategic context, including objectives, constraints and existing commitments, so that later categorization and prioritization are grounded in fact.
- Categorize step purpose
- Group portfolio investments into strategic categories, such as grow, sustain, transform and comply, so that prioritization compares like with like and each category maps clearly to strategic objectives.
- Prioritize step purpose
- Rank investments within categories using agreed weighted criteria such as strategic contribution, financial return, risk and compliance obligation. Criteria weights are set by senior management before scoring begins.
- Balance step purpose
- Deliberately adjust the portfolio mix across dimensions such as risk versus return, short-term versus long-term, cashable versus non-cashable benefits, and change versus business-as-usual, rather than leaving balance to emerge.
- Plan step purpose
- Produce the portfolio delivery plan consolidating the schedule of investments, milestones, resource requirements, benefits and dependencies, which is then refreshed as the portfolio changes during delivery.
- Portfolio management health check
- A structured assessment against the principles, practices and techniques producing a maturity profile, gaps and an improvement roadmap. It is a technique within the framework practice, not a separate practice.
- Benefits profile contents
- A document recording each benefit's description, named owner, baseline, target, measurement method and timing. The named benefit owner is business-side, not the project manager delivering the change.
- Benefits dependency network
- A diagram linking enablers and project outputs to intermediate outcomes, final benefits and strategic objectives. It exposes missing links and duplicate investment across the portfolio.
- Cashable versus non-cashable benefits
- Cashable benefits release money that can be reused; non-cashable benefits such as compliance, reputation or staff satisfaction do not. The distinction affects how benefits are measured and weighted in prioritization.
- Resource versus capacity management
- Resource management allocates finite resources such as people, money and assets to investments; capacity management matches portfolio demand for resources to the organization's actual supply, driving prioritization and balance decisions.
- Portfolio risk management focus
- Aggregates risk across the portfolio rather than managing only at project level. It addresses concentration risk, interdependency risk and risk appetite, using categorization, heat maps and a portfolio-level risk register.
- Risk appetite versus risk tolerance
- Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk the organization accepts across the portfolio, expressed in statements per category; risk tolerance is the acceptable variation around a specific objective.
- Net present value
- A financial appraisal metric that discounts future cash flows to today's value. A positive NPV supports investment; comparing NPVs across options ranks them on a common financial basis.
- Payback period
- The time taken to recover the investment from its benefits or returns. A shorter payback period indicates faster recovery but ignores value created after the payback point.
- Return on investment
- Calculated as benefit minus cost, divided by cost. It expresses return relative to the investment made and allows comparison of investments of different sizes on a common ratio basis.
- Cost-benefit ratio
- Benefits divided by costs. A ratio above one is financially favourable. It is one of several appraisal metrics and should be read alongside NPV, payback period and strategic fit.
- Weighted prioritization scoring
- Assign weights to criteria summing to one hundred percent, score each investment per criterion, multiply score by weight and sum. Sensitivity-test the result by varying weights to check whether ranking changes.
- Portfolio delivery plan
- The consolidated schedule of investments, milestones, resource requirements, benefits and dependencies. It is the output of the plan step and is refreshed as the portfolio changes.
- Portfolio office purpose
- Supports the portfolio by providing information, tools, standards, assurance and analysis. Its scope ranges from information hub through standards custodian and capability builder to strategic decision supporter, described by a maturity model.
- Portfolio strategy contents
- Translates organizational strategy into portfolio direction: strategic objectives, investment categories, prioritization criteria, risk appetite and the target portfolio mix, ensuring every investment maps to a strategic objective.
- Strategy alignment principle
- Every investment in the portfolio must demonstrably map to a strategic objective. Investments that no longer align are candidates for re-scoping or termination at an investment gate.
- Governance alignment principle
- Portfolio management must fit the organization's existing governance, such as board, investment committee and audit, rather than creating parallel structures. Decision rights and escalation thresholds are explicitly defined.
- Senior management commitment principle
- Visible, active sponsorship from the top is required. Commitment is demonstrated through participation in decisions, resourcing the portfolio office and enforcing prioritization outcomes, without which portfolio management degrades into reporting.
- Energized change culture principle
- The organization must be receptive to change, with clear communication, incentives aligned to portfolio objectives and willingness to stop low-value investments. Culture is assessed as part of the health check.
- Investment gate decision options
- A portfolio board decision point reviewing business case, delivery progress and continued strategic fit. The gate can approve, hold, re-scope or terminate an investment; termination is a legitimate portfolio decision.
- Stakeholder power-interest grid
- Maps stakeholders by power and interest. High power and high interest means manage closely; high power and low interest means keep satisfied; low power and high interest means keep informed; low on both means monitor.
- Capacity gap response options
- When demand exceeds supply, respond by reducing scope, delaying investments, acquiring more resource or changing the portfolio mix. The choice is a portfolio-level decision recorded in the delivery plan.