I85PREP
⌘ K
MS Bar study materials
MS Bar study resources

MS Bar practice questions

One question at a time. Build your MS Bar understanding.

First 50 of 199 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Civil Procedure

Under the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, within how many days after service of the summons and complaint must a defendant serve a responsive pleading in a typical civil action?

  1. 21 days
  2. 45 days
  3. 30 days Correct answer.
  4. 20 days

Explanation

Mississippi follows the federal model, and Rule 12(a) gives a defendant 30 days after being served with the summons and complaint to serve an answer or other responsive pleading. The period runs from service, not from filing, and is computed under Rule 6.

Question 2Civil Procedure

A plaintiff files suit in Mississippi state court and wishes to serve process on an out-of-state defendant. Which method of service is proper under the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure?

  1. Certified mail, return receipt requested, by the clerk or plaintiff Correct answer.
  2. Email to the defendant's last known address
  3. Posting a copy on the courthouse door
  4. Publication in a local newspaper without any court order

Explanation

Rule 4 permits service by certified mail with return receipt requested, and the mailing may be made by the clerk or by the plaintiff or the plaintiff's attorney. Publication and posting require specific authorization, typically by court order in cases involving unknown or absent defendants.

Question 3Civil Procedure

In a Mississippi circuit court action, the plaintiff wants to amend the complaint to add a new claim after the defendant has already filed an answer. What is the general rule governing that amendment?

  1. Leave to amend is freely given when justice so requires, and the defendant's consent or the court's leave is needed once the pleading period has passed Correct answer.
  2. Amendment requires the consent of both parties recorded by the clerk
  3. Amendment is permitted only before the scheduling order issues
  4. Amendment is barred once an answer has been filed

Explanation

Rule 15(a) directs that leave to amend be freely given when justice so requires. A party may amend once as a matter of course within the early period, but after a responsive pleading is served, amendment requires the opposing party's written consent or leave of court.

Question 4Civil Procedure

A Mississippi defendant believes the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. What procedural step does the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure authorize?

  1. A motion for a directed verdict
  2. A motion for summary judgment filed with the answer
  3. A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, which may be raised by motion before pleading Correct answer.
  4. A demurrer filed separately with the clerk

Explanation

Rule 12(b)(6) authorizes a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and Rule 12(b) motions are made before serving a responsive pleading. The motion tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint rather than the evidence.

Question 5Civil Procedure

A Mississippi plaintiff serves interrogatories on the defendant along with the complaint. The defendant objects that the requests are premature. How should the court likely rule?

  1. Sustain the objection, because interrogatories must await a scheduling order
  2. Sustain the objection, because discovery cannot begin until the answer is filed
  3. Overrule the objection, because discovery may proceed after commencement subject to any scheduling order Correct answer.
  4. Overrule the objection only if the plaintiff obtains leave of court first

Explanation

Under Rule 26, discovery may begin after the action is commenced, although a court may by order or local rule delay it. Serving interrogatories with the complaint is generally permissible, subject to any scheduling order and the Rule 33 limits.

Question 6Civil Procedure

Which of the following best describes the scope of discovery under the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure?

  1. Only evidence that would be admissible at trial
  2. Only documents the opposing party intends to introduce at trial
  3. Only information within the personal knowledge of a party
  4. Any nonprivileged matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action and proportional to the needs of the case Correct answer.

Explanation

Rule 26(b)(1) permits discovery of any nonprivileged matter relevant to the subject matter of the action and proportional to the needs of the case. Relevance for discovery is broader than admissibility at trial, and inadmissible information may still be discoverable if reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.

Question 7Civil Procedure

A party in a Mississippi civil case fails to respond to a request for production within the time allowed and offers no objection. What consequence is most consistent with the discovery rules?

  1. The failure automatically results in dismissal of the action
  2. The requesting party must file a second request before seeking relief
  3. The court may order the requested production and impose sanctions, including costs and attorney's fees Correct answer.
  4. The failure is excused because requests for production are self-executing

Explanation

Rule 37 authorizes a motion to compel when a party fails to respond to discovery, and the court may order production and award the moving party its reasonable expenses. Failure to respond also waives objections that were not timely asserted.

Question 8Civil Procedure

In a Mississippi state court action, when may a party demand a jury trial on a legal claim?

  1. Only with leave of court after the scheduling conference
  2. Only if the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional threshold
  3. By serving a written demand no later than 30 days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue Correct answer.
  4. Only if the complaint expressly requests a jury in the prayer for relief

Explanation

Rule 38 requires a party to serve a written demand for a jury trial no later than 30 days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue. Failure to make a timely demand constitutes a waiver of jury trial on those issues.

Question 9Civil Procedure

A Mississippi defendant receives a complaint but believes the court lacks personal jurisdiction over her. What is the proper way to preserve the defense under the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure?

  1. File a counterclaim first and then raise the defense
  2. Raise it for the first time at trial
  3. Raise it in the answer or by a Rule 12(b) motion, and do not take action that waives the defense Correct answer.
  4. Ignore the complaint and default, then raise the defense on appeal

Explanation

A defense of lack of personal jurisdiction must be raised in the answer or by a pre-answer Rule 12(b) motion, and it can be waived by failing to assert it or by taking substantial action inconsistent with the defense. A party who defaults generally cannot raise the defense later on appeal.

Question 10Civil Procedure

A Mississippi plaintiff sues a defendant in the wrong county. The defendant wishes to challenge venue. What is the proper procedural vehicle?

  1. A motion for change of judge
  2. A motion to dismiss or transfer for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3) Correct answer.
  3. A motion in limine
  4. A motion to quash service of process

Explanation

Improper venue is challenged under Rule 12(b)(3) by motion before responding, and the court may dismiss or transfer the action. A motion to quash attacks service rather than the location of the action.

Question 11Civil Procedure

In a Mississippi civil action, a party wants to take the deposition of a nonparty witness who resides outside the state. Which statement best reflects the rules?

  1. A nonparty deposition may be taken only after the close of discovery
  2. A party may notice the deposition and, if necessary, obtain a subpoena under the applicable procedure for out-of-state witnesses Correct answer.
  3. Nonparty depositions are prohibited in Mississippi state court actions
  4. A party must obtain leave of court for every nonparty deposition

Explanation

Rule 30 and Rule 45 allow a party to notice a deposition and to subpoena a nonparty witness, with procedures for compelling attendance of witnesses located outside the state. Leave of court is not generally required for an ordinary nonparty deposition.

Question 12Civil Procedure

A defendant in a Mississippi case fails to appear and a default is entered. What must the plaintiff generally do before a default judgment may be entered?

  1. Obtain a jury verdict on damages first
  2. Nothing, because default judgment follows automatically upon default
  3. Apply to the court for entry of default judgment, with notice and proof of the amount due where the claim is for a sum certain or requires proof Correct answer.
  4. Serve a second summons on the defendant

Explanation

Entry of default under Rule 55 is a ministerial step, but a default judgment requires an application to the court. Where the amount is not for a sum certain, the court may require proof of damages, and notice must be given to a party who has appeared.

Question 13Civil Procedure

A Mississippi litigant seeks summary judgment. Which showing must the movant make under the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure?

  1. That there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law Correct answer.
  2. That the movant's evidence is more persuasive than the opponent's evidence
  3. That the opponent has failed to conduct discovery
  4. That the trial judge has discretion to weigh the evidence

Explanation

Rule 56 permits summary judgment only when the pleadings, discovery, and affidavits show no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court does not weigh evidence or decide credibility at this stage.

Question 14Civil Procedure

During trial in a Mississippi circuit court, the plaintiff wants to call a witness whose name was not disclosed in discovery as required. What is the most likely result if the defendant objects?

  1. The court may exclude the testimony or impose other appropriate sanctions for the discovery violation Correct answer.
  2. The witness may always testify because discovery violations do not affect trial
  3. The witness may testify only if the jury agrees
  4. The court must declare a mistrial

Explanation

Rule 37 gives the court discretion to impose sanctions for failure to comply with discovery obligations, including excluding evidence or witnesses. The sanction should be proportionate, and exclusion is not automatic in every case.

Question 15Civil Procedure

Which statement accurately describes the Mississippi Supreme Court's role in the state court system?

  1. It is the only court that may conduct jury trials in civil cases
  2. It has original jurisdiction over all civil actions filed in the state
  3. It is the court of last resort in Mississippi, hearing appeals from the Court of Appeals and, in certain cases, directly from trial courts Correct answer.
  4. It reviews only criminal appeals

Explanation

The Mississippi Supreme Court is the state's court of last resort. It hears appeals from the Court of Appeals and may take cases directly from trial courts in specified circumstances, and it has rulemaking and administrative authority over the judiciary.

Question 16Civil Procedure

A Mississippi plaintiff files a complaint in circuit court seeking $200,000 in damages. The defendant argues the circuit court lacks jurisdiction. How should the court rule?

  1. The circuit court has jurisdiction only if the parties agree
  2. The circuit court lacks jurisdiction because all civil claims must begin in county court
  3. The circuit court has jurisdiction, because it is the court of general jurisdiction for civil claims exceeding the county court limit Correct answer.
  4. The circuit court lacks jurisdiction because the amount exceeds $100,000

Explanation

Mississippi circuit courts are courts of general jurisdiction and hear civil actions involving amounts above the jurisdictional threshold for county courts. A claim of $200,000 falls within circuit court jurisdiction.

Question 17Civil Procedure

A Mississippi defendant is served with a complaint but the service was made by a private process server who left the papers with an adult at the defendant's residence. Which principle governs whether service was sufficient?

  1. Service at a residence is never valid without a court order
  2. Service is valid only if made by the sheriff
  3. Service on a person of suitable age and discretion at the defendant's dwelling may be sufficient under the rules Correct answer.
  4. Service is valid only if the defendant personally signed for the papers

Explanation

Rule 4 permits service by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the defendant personally or by leaving copies at the defendant's dwelling with a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there. Personal signature and service by the sheriff alone are not required.

Question 18Civil Procedure

A party in a Mississippi civil action wants to compel a nonparty to produce documents. What is the proper mechanism?

  1. A motion for summary judgment
  2. A subpoena duces tecum issued under Rule 45 Correct answer.
  3. A request for production served directly on the nonparty without any subpoena
  4. An interrogatory directed to the nonparty

Explanation

A nonparty is not subject to the party-to-party discovery devices such as interrogatories and requests for production; the proper tool is a subpoena duces tecum under Rule 45. The subpoena commands production and provides the nonparty an opportunity to object.

Question 19Civil Procedure

A Mississippi plaintiff obtains a judgment and seeks to enforce it against the defendant's bank account. Which statement best describes the available procedure?

  1. The plaintiff may execute on the judgment through a writ of execution or garnishment as provided by statute and rule Correct answer.
  2. The plaintiff must wait five years before any enforcement action
  3. The plaintiff must file a new lawsuit to collect the judgment
  4. The plaintiff may seize the defendant's property without any court process

Explanation

Mississippi law provides post-judgment remedies including writs of execution and garnishment to satisfy a judgment, and these procedures require compliance with statutory and rule-based steps. A judgment creditor does not need to file a new action to enforce the judgment.

Question 20Civil Procedure

A Mississippi litigant seeks relief from a final judgment months after it was entered, alleging newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered earlier with due diligence. Which rule governs?

  1. Rule 60(b), relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding Correct answer.
  2. Rule 56, motion for summary judgment
  3. Rule 12(b), motion to dismiss
  4. Rule 59, motion to alter or amend the judgment

Explanation

Rule 60(b) provides relief from a final judgment for reasons including newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59. Such motions must be made within a reasonable time and, for certain grounds, within one year after the judgment.

Question 21Constitutional Law

Under the Fourth Amendment, a warrantless search of a person's home is presumptively unreasonable, subject to a few established exceptions. Which principle best explains why the presumption applies with special force to the home?

  1. The home is the clearest example of a zone of privacy the Amendment was designed to protect Correct answer.
  2. The Amendment applies only to dwellings and not to commercial premises or vehicles
  3. Homes are typically owned rather than rented, which distinguishes them from other property
  4. Warrantless home searches are permitted whenever officers announce their presence

Explanation

Fourth Amendment doctrine treats the home as the paradigmatic zone of privacy, so warrantless entry is presumptively unreasonable unless a recognized exception applies. The protection attaches to the premises and the person's reasonable expectation of privacy, not to the form of ownership.

Question 22Constitutional Law

A state enacts a law that prohibits any person from displaying a sign criticizing a named public official within 100 feet of that official's residence at any time. A protestor is prosecuted for holding such a sign on a public sidewalk. Which constitutional defect is most central to the challenge?

  1. The law is a bill of attainder singling out a particular official for protection
  2. The law is an ex post facto measure because it applies to conduct before enactment
  3. The law restricts speech based on its content without surviving strict scrutiny Correct answer.
  4. The law violates the right to bear arms as incorporated against the states

Explanation

A law that targets criticism of a specific official regulates speech by content and viewpoint, triggering strict scrutiny that such a broad, categorical ban cannot survive. Content-based restrictions must serve a compelling interest through the least restrictive means.

Question 23Constitutional Law

Which clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the primary vehicle for applying most provisions of the Bill of Rights against state and local governments?

  1. The Due Process Clause Correct answer.
  2. The Guarantee Clause
  3. The Privileges or Immunities Clause
  4. The Equal Protection Clause

Explanation

Selective incorporation has proceeded almost entirely through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which the Court has read to make fundamental Bill of Rights guarantees applicable to the states. The Privileges or Immunities Clause was largely foreclosed as a vehicle by the Slaughter-House Cases.

Question 24Constitutional Law

Congress passes a statute requiring states to either adopt a federally prescribed minimum drinking age or forfeit a portion of their federal highway funding. Which doctrine governs whether this condition is constitutional?

  1. The commerce power doctrine, asking whether the regulated activity substantially affects interstate commerce
  2. The Tenth Amendment anticommandeering doctrine, which bars all conditions on federal grants
  3. The spending power doctrine, asking whether the condition is related to the federal interest and not coercive Correct answer.
  4. The appointments power, asking whether the condition was imposed by a properly appointed officer

Explanation

Conditions attached to federal spending are tested under the spending power: they must serve the general welfare, be unambiguous, relate to the federal interest, and not cross the line from pressure to compulsion. A condition that merely influences state choices through funding is permissible.

Question 25Constitutional Law

A defendant is tried in state court for a felony. Which right is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment as incorporated against the states?

  1. The right to a unanimous jury verdict in all criminal cases
  2. The right to a grand jury indictment
  3. The right to counsel in felony prosecutions Correct answer.
  4. The right to appeal to an intermediate appellate court

Explanation

Gideon v. Wainwright incorporated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel for felony defendants against the states. The grand jury requirement and the criminal jury unanimity rule have not been incorporated in the same way, and there is no federal constitutional right to an appeal.

Question 26Constitutional Law

A city ordinance bans all billboards within city limits but allows on-premises commercial signs. A billboard company challenges the ordinance. Under First Amendment doctrine, which standard should a court apply to the ban on billboards?

  1. Strict scrutiny, because billboards are a protected medium of expression
  2. Intermediate scrutiny, because the ordinance is a content-neutral regulation of commercial speech Correct answer.
  3. No review, because cities have unreviewable authority over aesthetics
  4. Rational basis review, because billboards are commercial speech and receive no protection

Explanation

A ban on billboards that is justified by aesthetics and traffic safety and does not discriminate based on the message is a content-neutral time, place, and manner regulation of commercial speech, reviewed under intermediate scrutiny. Courts ask whether the restriction directly advances a substantial interest and is narrowly tailored.

Question 27Constitutional Law

A police officer stops a car for a burned-out taillight. During the stop, the officer orders the driver out of the vehicle and, without consent or probable cause, searches the passenger compartment. Under current doctrine, which statement is correct?

  1. Neither the order to exit nor the search is permissible without a warrant
  2. The search is permissible because traffic stops are categorically exempt from the Fourth Amendment
  3. The order to exit is permissible, but the warrantless search of the passenger compartment requires probable cause Correct answer.
  4. Both the order to exit and the search are permissible based solely on the traffic violation

Explanation

Officers may order occupants out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop for officer safety, but a search of the passenger compartment requires probable cause to believe it contains evidence of the offense or contraband. The traffic violation alone does not supply that probable cause.

Question 28Constitutional Law

A state university adopts an admissions policy that awards points to applicants from designated underrepresented groups. A rejected applicant challenges the policy under the Equal Protection Clause. Which standard of review applies?

  1. Intermediate scrutiny, because education is an important governmental interest
  2. Strict scrutiny, because the policy classifies applicants by race Correct answer.
  3. Rational basis with bite, because the policy involves a fundamental right to education
  4. Rational basis review, because universities are public institutions

Explanation

Racial classifications, including those framed as benign affirmative action, are subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. The government must show a compelling interest and narrow tailoring, and the Court has rejected point-based systems that do not provide individualized consideration.

Question 29Constitutional Law

A state statute requires all candidates for state office to be nominated by a political party that received at least 20 percent of the vote in the prior gubernatorial election. A new party challenges the requirement. Which analytical framework applies?

  1. The requirement is evaluated under the Contracts Clause because it affects political parties' prior arrangements
  2. The state may impose any ballot access rule because elections are a matter of state sovereignty
  3. The requirement is valid if it is rationally related to any conceivable state interest
  4. The state must show the requirement is narrowly drawn to serve a compelling interest, because it burdens ballot access Correct answer.

Explanation

Ballot access restrictions burden the rights of voters and candidates to associate and to vote effectively, so courts apply a heightened balancing test requiring the state to justify the burden with important regulatory interests and narrow tailoring. Severe burdens trigger strict scrutiny.

Question 30Constitutional Law

A federal agency official is removed by the President without cause. The statute creating the office provides that the official may be removed only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. Which precedent most directly governs the constitutionality of the removal restriction?

  1. Humphrey's Executor, upholding tenure protection for members of an independent regulatory commission Correct answer.
  2. Myers v. United States, holding that the President has unrestricted removal power over all officers
  3. Bowsher v. Comptroller General, holding that Congress may not retain removal power over executive officers
  4. Morrison v. Olson, holding that the Appointments Clause bars independent counsels

Explanation

Humphrey's Executor upheld a statute limiting removal of FTC commissioners to cause, recognizing that Congress may create independent agencies whose heads are shielded from at-will presidential removal. Later cases such as Morrison and Seila Law refine the analysis based on the nature of the office and the President's supervisory authority.

Question 31Constitutional Law

A protestor burns an American flag as part of a political demonstration and is prosecuted under a state statute prohibiting flag desecration. Which outcome is most consistent with Supreme Court precedent?

  1. The conviction is invalid because flag burning is commercial speech subject only to intermediate scrutiny
  2. The conviction is valid because burning property is conduct, not speech
  3. The conviction is invalid because the statute suppresses expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment Correct answer.
  4. The conviction is valid because the flag is a unique national symbol that the state may protect

Explanation

In Texas v. Johnson the Court held that flag burning as political protest is expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment, and a statute targeting desecration of the flag suppresses expression based on its message. The government may not prohibit expression merely because society finds the idea offensive.

Question 32Constitutional Law

A defendant is charged with a crime and, during custodial interrogation, invokes the right to remain silent. Which statement best describes the consequence under Miranda doctrine?

  1. Interrogation must cease, and police may not reinitiate questioning unless counsel is present
  2. The invocation waives the right to counsel for all subsequent proceedings
  3. The invocation is ineffective unless made in writing signed by the defendant
  4. Interrogation must cease, but the police may later reinitiate questioning after a significant period Correct answer.

Explanation

Under Miranda, once a suspect invokes the right to remain silent, interrogation must stop; the police may resume only after a significant period and fresh warnings, and the suspect may then waive. Invocation of the right to counsel is stronger, barring further questioning unless counsel is present or the suspect initiates.

Question 33Constitutional Law

A state enacts a law that imposes a $10,000 civil penalty on any person who knowingly publishes a book containing information about how to build an explosive device. A publisher challenges the law. Which doctrine is most directly implicated?

  1. The Contracts Clause of Article I
  2. The Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
  3. The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule
  4. The First Amendment doctrine governing incitement and the clear and present danger standard Correct answer.

Explanation

Restrictions on publishing information about dangerous materials raise First Amendment questions about whether the speech is directed to inciting imminent lawless action and likely to produce it. Under Brandenburg, advocacy may be punished only when it is intended and likely to incite imminent unlawful action.

Question 34Constitutional Law

Congress enacts a statute directing state legislatures to enact a specific regulatory scheme for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste and providing that state officials who fail to do so will be subject to federal penalties. Which constitutional principle is most directly implicated?

  1. The Presentment Clause, because the statute regulates state legislation
  2. The anticommandeering principle derived from the Tenth Amendment Correct answer.
  3. The Commerce Clause, because waste disposal affects interstate commerce
  4. The spending power, because the statute involves federal funds

Explanation

The anticommandeering principle prohibits the federal government from commandeering state legislatures to enact federal programs or state executives to administer them. Congress may offer states choices through spending conditions or regulate private conduct directly, but it may not conscript state officials.

Question 35Constitutional Law

A state court convicts a defendant after the prosecution fails to disclose evidence that would have impeached a key witness. The defendant seeks federal habeas relief. Which standard governs whether the nondisclosure violated due process?

  1. Whether the evidence was material, meaning there is a reasonable probability that its disclosure would have changed the outcome Correct answer.
  2. Whether the prosecution acted in bad faith in withholding the evidence
  3. Whether the defendant requested the evidence before trial
  4. Whether the evidence was admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence

Explanation

Under Brady v. Maryland, suppression of favorable evidence violates due process when the evidence is material, meaning a reasonable probability exists that disclosure would have produced a different result. The defendant need not prove bad faith or make a specific request.

Question 36Constitutional Law

A federal statute grants the President authority to designate certain lands as national monuments and to impose conditions on their use. A state challenges the designation, arguing that the statute delegates legislative power without an intelligible principle. Which standard governs the nondelegation challenge?

  1. The statute is valid if it provides an intelligible principle to guide the President's discretion Correct answer.
  2. The statute is valid only if the President's action is subject to a legislative veto
  3. The statute is invalid because land use is a matter reserved exclusively to the states
  4. The statute is invalid unless it specifies every condition of land use in detail

Explanation

Nondelegation doctrine permits Congress to delegate authority so long as it supplies an intelligible principle to guide the exercise of discretion. Courts uphold broad delegations where the statute articulates a general policy and boundaries for the delegate's action.

Question 37Contracts and Sales

A retailer emails a wholesaler: "Will you sell me 500 units at $10 each?" The wholesaler replies: "We can supply 500 units at $10 each." Under the common law, what have the parties created?

  1. An enforceable option contract, because the wholesaler committed to the price
  2. A contract only if the retailer tenders payment immediately
  3. No contract, because the reply is an inquiry rather than a promise to be bound Correct answer.
  4. A binding contract, because the reply matched every term of the offer

Explanation

A purported acceptance that merely states willingness or quotes terms without expressing a commitment to be bound operates as an invitation to deal or a mere inquiry. Because no definite promise was given, no mutual assent exists and no contract forms. The price quotation alone does not create a power of acceptance in the retailer.

Question 38Contracts and Sales

Under UCC Article 2, which term may generally be left open without defeating formation of a contract for the sale of goods?

  1. The price of the goods Correct answer.
  2. The quantity of goods to be sold
  3. The identity of the buyer
  4. The subject matter of the sale

Explanation

UCC 2-305 permits a contract to be formed even though the price is left open, with a reasonable price supplied as a gap-filler. Quantity, by contrast, is the one term that must be stated with certainty under 2-201 and the general formation rules. Identification of the parties and the subject matter are likewise essential.

Question 39Contracts and Sales

A homeowner signs a written contract to buy a specific parcel from a seller. Before closing, the seller conveys the parcel to a third party who pays value and records first, without notice of the homeowner's contract. What is the homeowner's best theory of recovery against the seller?

  1. Specific performance of the conveyance, because the parcel is unique
  2. Reformation of the deed to the third party
  3. Equitable conversion, because the risk of loss shifted at signing
  4. Expectation damages for breach of the covenant to convey Correct answer.

Explanation

Once the seller has conveyed to a bona fide purchaser, the seller cannot perform, so the buyer's remedy is damages measured by the difference between contract price and market value. Specific performance is unavailable because the seller no longer holds title. Equitable conversion addresses risk of loss and beneficial ownership between the parties, not the rights of a subsequent purchaser.

Question 40Contracts and Sales

A buyer and seller orally agree on the sale of a used piano for $3,000. The seller later refuses to deliver, raising the Statute of Frauds. Which fact most likely allows the buyer to enforce the agreement?

  1. The seller is a merchant who regularly sells pianos
  2. The buyer sent a signed check for the full price that the seller deposited Correct answer.
  3. The buyer inspected the piano before agreeing
  4. The parties had done business together for years

Explanation

Under UCC 2-201(3)(c), payment that has been received and accepted satisfies the Statute of Frauds to the extent of the payment. A check that the seller deposits and keeps is accepted payment, supporting enforcement for the amount paid. Inspection, merchant status, and a course of dealing do not by themselves remove the writing requirement.

Question 41Contracts and Sales

An offeror mails a revocation on Monday; the offeree mails an acceptance on Tuesday; the revocation arrives Wednesday and the acceptance arrives Thursday. The offer had no option contract. What is the result?

  1. A contract formed Thursday, when the offeror learned of the acceptance
  2. No contract, because the acceptance arrived after the revocation
  3. No contract, because the revocation was dispatched before the acceptance
  4. A contract formed Tuesday, because the mailbox rule governs acceptance Correct answer.

Explanation

Under the mailbox rule, acceptance is effective on dispatch, so the contract formed Tuesday. A revocation is effective only on receipt, and here it arrived Wednesday, after formation. Once the power of acceptance has been exercised, a later-arriving revocation has no effect.

Question 42Contracts and Sales

A party seeks to avoid a contract claiming the other side failed to disclose a material fact. In which situation is nondisclosure most clearly equivalent to a misrepresentation?

  1. The undisclosed party stands in a fiduciary relationship with the other Correct answer.
  2. The fact is obvious on a reasonable inspection of the property
  3. The fact concerns the profitability of a business the buyer plans to run
  4. The fact would merely have changed the price the other party was willing to pay

Explanation

Silence is actionable where a fiduciary or confidential relationship imposes a duty to speak, because the law treats concealment as a breach of that duty. Outside such relationships, mere failure to volunteer information is generally not misrepresentation absent active concealment or a half-truth.

Question 43Contracts and Sales

A tenant signs a one-year lease. Six months later the landlord and tenant orally agree that the tenant may stay an additional year at the same rent. The tenant stays, and the landlord now seeks to evict. Which doctrine most helps the tenant?

  1. The doctrine of merger, because the lease term ended
  2. Promissory estoppel, because the tenant relied on the promise
  3. Part performance, because the tenant took possession Correct answer.
  4. The parol evidence rule, because the oral term explains the writing

Explanation

Part performance removes an agreement from the Statute of Frauds where the party seeking enforcement has taken possession and made improvements or paid rent in reliance. The tenant's continued possession under the oral extension supports this equitable exception. Promissory estoppel is a fallback but the more direct doctrine here is part performance.

Question 44Contracts and Sales

A seller agrees to deliver 1,000 widgets on June 1. On May 1 the seller unequivocally tells the buyer it will not deliver. The buyer does nothing until June 2, when it sues. What is the buyer's position?

  1. The buyer's claim is premature until the seller actually fails to deliver
  2. The buyer has waived the breach by waiting until the performance date
  3. The buyer may sue immediately upon the repudiation without waiting for the performance date Correct answer.
  4. The buyer must show it demanded assurances before any claim accrues

Explanation

An anticipatory repudiation that is clear and unequivocal gives the aggrieved party an immediate right to treat the contract as breached and sue. The buyer may also wait for performance, but it is not required to do so. Waiting does not waive the breach where the repudiation was total.

Question 45Contracts and Sales

A buyer and seller sign a fully integrated written contract for custom furniture. The buyer later seeks to introduce evidence that, before signing, the seller orally promised free delivery. Delivery is not mentioned in the writing. Under the parol evidence rule, the evidence is:

  1. Admissible, because the writing is silent on delivery Correct answer.
  2. Inadmissible, because delivery terms are always merged into price
  3. Inadmissible, because the writing is integrated and complete
  4. Admissible, only if the buyer can show fraud in the inducement

Explanation

A completely integrated writing bars evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements that contradict or supplement it, but evidence of a consistent additional term may be admitted if the writing is only partially integrated. Silence on delivery suggests the term may be consistent and supplemental rather than contradictory. The court decides integration, and silence alone does not establish completeness.

Question 46Contracts and Sales

A homeowner hires a contractor to remodel a kitchen for $40,000. After the contractor finishes half the work, the homeowner wrongfully bars the contractor from the site. What is the contractor's measure of damages?

  1. The contract price minus the cost the contractor saved by not finishing Correct answer.
  2. The reasonable value of the work performed, with no offset
  3. The full contract price, because the homeowner breached
  4. Nothing, because the contractor did not complete performance

Explanation

Where the owner prevents completion, the builder may recover the contract price less the cost of completion avoided, which avoids overcompensating the builder for work it never had to do. This is expectation damages measured at the point of breach. Recovery of the full price would give the contractor a windfall.

Question 47Contracts and Sales

A debtor owes a creditor $10,000. A friend promises the creditor in writing, "I will pay the debt if the debtor does not," and the creditor forbears collecting from the debtor for one month in reliance. Is the friend's promise enforceable?

  1. No, because a surety promise must be under seal
  2. Yes, because the creditor's forbearance is consideration supporting the surety promise Correct answer.
  3. No, because the friend received no benefit
  4. Yes, because the promise is in writing

Explanation

A promise to answer for another's debt is within the Statute of Frauds and must be in writing, which it is here. Forbearance to collect from the principal debtor, bargained for by the surety, is valid consideration supporting the surety's promise. The surety need not receive a direct benefit.

Question 48Contracts and Sales

A merchant sends a signed writing confirming an oral agreement for the sale of goods and states that the recipient should object within ten days if the terms are inaccurate. The recipient is a merchant but never responds. What is the effect of the confirmation?

  1. It has no effect because the recipient never signed it
  2. It binds the recipient only if the recipient performed
  3. It creates a contract even if the parties never orally agreed
  4. It satisfies the Statute of Frauds against the recipient unless the recipient objects within ten days Correct answer.

Explanation

Under UCC 2-201(2), between merchants, a signed confirmation of an oral agreement that is sufficient against the sender satisfies the Statute of Frauds against the recipient unless written objection is made within ten days. The recipient's silence operates as assent for Statute of Frauds purposes. The rule presupposes an actual prior oral agreement.

Question 49Contracts and Sales

A software company and a client sign a contract with a clause stating that the company is not liable for "any damages arising from use of the software." The company's gross negligence causes a data breach. How will a court most likely treat the clause?

  1. Reform it to cap damages at the contract price
  2. Enforce it only as to direct damages, leaving consequential damages recoverable
  3. Refuse to enforce it as to the gross negligence, because exculpation for gross negligence is disfavored Correct answer.
  4. Enforce it as written, because freedom of contract allows parties to allocate risk

Explanation

Courts generally enforce limitation and exculpation clauses for ordinary negligence but refuse to shield a party from liability for gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct as against public policy. A clause purporting to excuse all liability for gross negligence is therefore likely unenforceable to that extent. The remainder may be enforced if severable.

Question 50Contracts and Sales

A buyer agrees to purchase goods from a seller. The seller later assigns its right to payment to a bank. The contract contains no anti-assignment clause. What is the effect of the assignment?

  1. It is invalid unless the buyer consents
  2. It is void because the contract is for goods
  3. It is valid, and the buyer must pay the bank Correct answer.
  4. It is valid only if the seller also delegates its duties

Explanation

Contract rights are generally freely assignable unless the assignment materially changes the obligor's duty, is barred by law, or is precluded by the contract. An assignment of the right to payment does not change the buyer's duty, so the buyer must pay the assignee. Consent is not required absent a contractual restriction.