MT Asbestos Abatement study materials
MT Asbestos Abatement study resources

Fourteen Drums, a Torn Bag, and a Landfill That Doesn't Take Friable

MT Asbestos Abatement · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Fourteen Drums, a Torn Bag, and a Landfill That Doesn't Take Friable

During a three-week removal of 1,200 square feet of vinyl asbestos floor tile and mastic in a former department store being converted to offices, the crew uses a ride-on scraper that breaks most tiles into irregular pieces. Debris is double-bagged in 6-mil poly, twist-tied, and placed in 55-gallon steel drums with lids. On the last day, the crew loads 14 drums onto a flatbed pickup for the 90-mile trip to a subtitle D landfill. During loading, a bag in one drum tears and tile fragments and black mastic dust spill into the truck bed; a worker sweeps the material up with a broom and puts it back in the same drum. The drums carry no labels or markings. The landfill's approved waste list does not include friable asbestos, and the scale operator is told the load is 'non-friable construction debris.' The owner asks whether any of this matters, since floor tile is 'non-friable.'

1. Is the waste regulated asbestos-containing material? Address the 'floor tile is non-friable' claim against how the work was actually done.

Read the worked answer

Start with the category. Vinyl floor tile is ordinarily a Category I non-friable material, and undisturbed tile removed intact is often handled under the non-friable provisions with no notification, provided the 160-square-foot threshold for RACM is not otherwise triggered. That is the theory the owner is relying on.

Then apply the facts. Category I material loses its non-friable status when it has been crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder, or when the removal method will do so. A ride-on scraper that breaks most tiles into irregular pieces, plus dust from the mastic, produces exactly that condition. The material as generated is friable, and friable asbestos waste is regulated. The dry sweep of the spill generated visible dust, confirming that the waste stream is not behaving as a bonded material.

Consequences. The load must be managed as friable ACM waste: no visible emissions during handling and transport, wetting, leak-tight packaging, and disposal at a site permitted to accept it. The claim printed on the scale ticket does not change the character of what is in the drums, and misdescribing the load to the landfill is a separate problem from the original classification error.

2. Identify the packaging, labeling, cleanup, and transport deficiencies and state the correct practice for each.

Read the worked answer

Packaging. Debris should be wetted before bagging. Bags must be leak-tight and closed by goosenecking and taping, not twist ties, which do not seal. Double-bagging is fine, but each bag must be closed individually. Drums should be lined and clearly marked, and a torn bag means the drum's contents must be repackaged entirely, not topped off.

Labeling. Each container requires the required asbestos warning label. Unmarked drums are indefensible in any inspection and make the waste indistinguishable from ordinary debris at the landfill.

Cleanup of the spill. Dry sweeping is prohibited for asbestos debris because it re-suspends fibers. The correct response is to stop loading, wet the material, use HEPA vacuuming and wet wiping, place all debris and used wipes in a sealed bag, and decontaminate the truck bed before it carries anything else. The broom itself becomes contaminated waste.

Transport. An open flatbed is not an appropriate conveyance for friable asbestos waste; the load must be in a closed, covered vehicle or covered so no fibers escape in transit. The material also needs a transport review: friable asbestos waste is a regulated hazardous material for shipping, which means trained employees, proper shipping papers and emergency response information, and packages that will not release fibers. A driver handed 14 unmarked drums on a pickup satisfies none of that.

3. The landfill does not accept friable asbestos. What should happen before the truck leaves, and what records close out the project?

Read the worked answer

Before the truck leaves. The load cannot go to a landfill whose approved waste list excludes friable asbestos. The generator must identify a disposal site permitted to accept asbestos waste, confirm acceptance requirements in advance, and provide any advance notice the site requires. The drums should be unloaded, the damaged container repackaged, all containers labeled, and the vehicle cleaned. The scale operator should be given an accurate description; a load that arrives misdescribed will be rejected, and the rejection itself creates a record that will be found later.

Responsibility does not transfer with the truck. The waste generator remains responsible for ensuring the material reaches an appropriate disposal site. Handing drums to a hauler does not discharge that duty.

Records to close out. The notification (if one was filed), the daily logs and air monitoring, the waste shipment record showing quantity and container count, the disposal receipt from the accepting facility identifying the waste as asbestos-containing, and the employee training and respirator files for everyone who handled the material. Photograph the repackaged and labeled containers before shipment. If the misdescribed load reached the landfill, notify the facility and the state solid waste program in writing rather than waiting for the discrepancy to surface at the next inspection. The owner should be told plainly that the 'it's just tile' assumption is the root cause and that future phases need a written waste determination before the first drum is filled.