The Bulldozed Section Corner
During a subdivision construction project in Gallatin County, a contractor's excavator destroys a brass-capped section corner monument that you set two years ago. The contractor's foreman tells you, "We saved the cap. We'll just stick it back in a pipe and cover it up-no one will know, and we don't want to delay the pour." The client says the same: "You can reset it later; the county doesn't need a report." You know the corner controls several lot lines and an adjoining 80-acre parcel whose owner is not part of the project. The original cap is bent and the pipe is gone. A crew member took a photo of the destroyed monument before it was moved.
1. What are your legal and professional obligations when a survey monument is destroyed?
Read the worked answer
Montana law protects survey monuments. A licensee who knows that a monument has been destroyed or disturbed must not conceal it. The surveyor should direct the contractor to stop work in the immediate area, preserve the cap and the photo, and report the destruction to the county surveyor and/or the Board as required. The client's instruction not to report is not a defense. The corner is public boundary evidence affecting the adjoining 80-acre parcel, not just the project.
2. How should the corner be restored, and what records should be created?
Read the worked answer
Restoration must be based on the original ties and record evidence, not just putting the bent cap back in a pipe. Recover the original position from bearing trees, reference ties, or prior survey records; set a new monument with the proper cap; prepare a record of the restoration and, where required, a certificate of survey or corner record; and note the date and cause of destruction. Notify the adjoining owner and the county surveyor. The restored position should be tied to reliable evidence so future surveys are not misled.
3. What are the risks of the contractor's proposed cover-up?
Read the worked answer
The cover-up risks false boundary evidence, civil liability, and criminal penalties for monument destruction. The surveyor could face Board discipline for complicity or failure to report, and the contractor faces liability. Future surveys and title work could be wrong, especially for the adjoining 80-acre parcel. The photo is evidence and should be preserved. The delay from proper restoration is minor compared with the risk of a concealed destruction.