The Word 'Proven' in a 380-Word Essay
Dan has 35 minutes to write a 350–400 word argumentative essay: 'Should secondary schools start at 8:45 rather than 8:00?' He has three sources. The first is a survey of 40 Form 4 students at his own school, in which 78% agreed they 'often feel tired in first lesson'. The second is a news item about a US district that moved its start time and reported a 12% fall in lateness. The third is an interview with a headteacher who says bus timetables make any later start impossible. Dan's plan reads: 'Schools should start later because students are tired and it's proven better.' He intends to describe all three sources in order, then give his opinion in the last paragraph. He has written nothing about how the transport objection could be answered.
1. Identify the two reasoning faults in Dan's plan that will cost him most, and rewrite his thesis as a claim he can actually defend in 380 words.
Read the worked answer
Fault 1 - 'proven'. None of his sources can prove anything. A 40-student self-report survey from one school has no baseline, no comparison group and an obvious incentive to answer 'yes'; the US district differs in bus culture, distances and climate, so the result may not transfer; and the headteacher's objection is simply left standing, which means the essay never tests its own claim. The evidence supports 'it is worth trying', not 'it is proven'.
Fault 2 - a causal, total thesis in a short essay. 'Schools should start later because students are tired' asserts one cause and one solution to a multi-factor problem (bedtimes, screens, homework load, part-time work). In 380 words he can defend a qualified claim, not a total one.
Rewritten thesis 'A 45-minute later start is worth piloting for one scholastic year: the local survey, though small, points the same way as larger studies elsewhere, and the transport objection can be managed by staggering bus times rather than by abandoning the change.'
This keeps his own evidence, converts his strongest objection into a condition, and commits him to a position he can actually finish defending.
2. Give Dan a paragraph plan for 390 words that places the counterargument where it earns credit, and explain the reasoning behind the placement.
Read the worked answer
Plan (390 words)
- Introduction, 50 words: frame the question, then the thesis above. No source description yet.
- Paragraph 2, 110 words: his strongest reason - alertness in first lesson - with the survey cited honestly: '78% of 40 Form 4 students at this school reported...', plus the hedge 'small and self-selected'. Then the US district as supporting, not conclusive, evidence.
- Paragraph 3, 110 words: the counterargument at its strongest - bus timetables, rural distances, parents' work hours - followed by a rebuttal: a one-year pilot with staggered routes, and a review date. Answer it; do not merely mention it.
- Paragraph 4, 80 words: the condition - the change is worth making only if the pilot is evaluated on lateness and attendance, not on how students say they feel.
- Conclusion, 40 words: restate the qualified claim, no new evidence.
Why here, not at the end
- A concession placed before the conclusion shows the writer has weighed the strongest objection and still holds a position; an objection parked after the conclusion reads as an afterthought, or worse, as agreement.
- It lets him control the terms: he chooses which objection to concede rather than leaving the reader to supply one.
- Proportion matters. One paragraph out of four signals confidence; half the essay signals a collapse into 'it depends'.
- Avoid 'some people say': name the interest group. 'Head teachers responsible for bus contracts argue...' is a concession with a target, and targets can be answered.