MATSEC SEC Health and Social Care study materials
MATSEC SEC Health and Social Care study resources

A disclosure in a residential home

MATSEC SEC Health and Social Care · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A disclosure in a residential home

Leanne is 16 and has lived in a children's residential home in Malta for 14 months under a care order. She has a history of anxiety and has missed three CAMHS appointments in two months. One evening she shows her key worker, Maria, fresh cuts on her left forearm. She says she cut herself 'to feel something' and makes Maria promise not to tell anyone, adding: 'If you do, I'll say I fell and I won't talk to you again.' Maria knows Leanne has a good relationship with her and that the home's safeguarding policy requires the designated safeguarding lead to be informed within 24 hours. Leanne's parents have parental responsibility but contact is inconsistent; her social worker is on leave until Monday. It is Friday 8 pm. Maria has 20 minutes left of her shift and must hand over to the night staff.

1. What should Maria do before the end of her shift, and what should she not do? Justify each choice by reference to Leanne's rights and the home's duties.

Read the worked answer

Immediate safety and honesty. Maria should first check Leanne's wounds, offer basic first aid and ask whether she feels safe tonight. She should not promise secrecy; instead she should explain, in plain language, that she must share information that suggests Leanne is at risk, but that she will share only what is necessary and will tell Leanne who she is telling. This respects Leanne's right to information and participation while meeting the home's safeguarding duty.

Escalation. Fresh self-harm is an immediate concern, so Maria should not wait until Monday or rely on the 24-hour policy as a reason to delay. She should inform the on-call manager or designated safeguarding lead before the end of the shift, because the night staff need to know how to keep Leanne safe. The social worker's leave does not remove the duty to escalate; the manager can contact the out-of-hours service.

Recording and handover. Maria should record Leanne's exact words, the location and appearance of the cuts, what first aid was given, and Leanne's wishes. She should hand over on a need-to-know basis and agree who will tell Leanne what happens next. She should not tell other residents or staff who do not need to know. Parental responsibility does not give the parents an automatic right to every detail, especially if contact is inconsistent; the safeguarding lead should decide what to share and when, involving Leanne.

2. Leanne later says she will refuse to speak to the social worker and will deny the cuts. How should the staff team balance preserving trust with fulfilling safeguarding duties? Give a plan.

Read the worked answer

Preserving trust while not colluding. Staff should acknowledge that Leanne has told them something difficult and that it took courage. They should not argue about whether she will deny it. Instead, they should be honest: 'I can't keep this secret, but I can help you decide who I speak to and what they need to know.' This gives Leanne some control without making a false promise.

Plan. The safeguarding lead should offer a meeting with Leanne, a trusted adult and, if she wishes, an advocate. Leanne should be asked what would help her feel safer, including what staff should do if she self-harms again. The plan should include an urgent CAMHS appointment, a safe place to go at night, and a way to contact someone. If Leanne denies the cuts, staff should record the original observation and disclosure and continue to monitor, because denial does not remove the concern.

Reasoning. Leanne's rights to participation and privacy are important, but they are not absolute when there is a risk to her life or health. The least restrictive response is to involve her in decisions and share information only with those who need it, not to threaten or punish her. The relationship can survive a breach of secrecy if staff are transparent and consistent; it is less likely to survive if they lie or withdraw.