Fasting, diabetes and religious belief
Mr Ahmed is 84 and lives in a nursing home in Malta. He has type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, chronic kidney disease stage 3 and a sacral pressure ulcer. He is alert and oriented. It is the start of Ramadan and he tells the nurse he intends to fast from dawn to sunset for the whole month. He has fasted in previous years, but his insulin dose and kidney function have changed since then. The dietitian says his current intake is already below his estimated needs and his ulcer is not healing. His son, who visits daily, says fasting is dangerous and asks staff to 'make him eat'. Mr Ahmed says his faith is central to him and he does not want to be treated like a child. The GP is available by phone. The home has a Halal menu and an imam visits weekly.
1. How should the nurse respond to Mr Ahmed's decision to fast? Include assessment, negotiation and documentation.
Read the worked answer
Start with capacity and information. The nurse should not assume Mr Ahmed cannot decide because he is 84 or because his son disagrees. She should explore what he understands about the risks: hypoglycaemia, dehydration, worsening kidney function and delayed ulcer healing. Does he know that his insulin and kidney function have changed since he last fasted? Can he weigh the risks and explain what he would do if he became unwell? If he can, he has capacity to make this decision, even if others think it is unwise.
Negotiate a safe plan. The nurse should involve the GP, diabetes team, dietitian and imam. Islamic teaching allows exemption from fasting for illness, but Mr Ahmed may still choose to fast. A harm-reduction plan could include a supervised fast, adjusted insulin, blood glucose monitoring, fluids at night, a clear agreement to break the fast if glucose falls below an agreed level, and daily review. The plan should be written and signed by Mr Ahmed.
If he lacks capacity. A best-interests decision should consider his religious values, previous fasting, the views of his son and the imam, and the least restrictive option. The team should not simply force food. The reasoning should be documented, and the decision reviewed as his condition changes.
2. The son demands that staff prevent the fast. How should the team handle this conflict while respecting Mr Ahmed's rights?
Read the worked answer
Acknowledge the son's concern. The son is frightened, and his request comes from care, not necessarily control. The nurse should listen, explain that Mr Ahmed has been assessed as having capacity, and that staff cannot force treatment or food on a capacitous adult. Confidentiality means the nurse should not discuss every detail, but she can explain the general plan with Mr Ahmed's consent.
Mediate. A family meeting with Mr Ahmed, his son, the GP and the imam could reduce conflict. The imam can explain the religious position on illness and exemption; the diabetes team can explain the medical risks. The meeting should focus on what Mr Ahmed wants and what safety net he will accept. If the son tries to override his father, staff should calmly restate the boundary and record incidents.
Safeguarding and review. Disagreement is not abuse, but if the son threatens or coerces Mr Ahmed, the safeguarding lead should be informed. The team should review capacity if Mr Ahmed becomes confused or unwell. The aim is not to win the argument but to support a decision that is informed, voluntary and reviewed. The son should be offered support and information, and the plan should be shared only with those who need to know.