Five-part folk arrangement for Grade 3–4 players
Arranging candidate Luca must arrange a 16-bar Maltese folk melody for flute, B-flat clarinet, violin, cello and piano. The players are Grade 3–4; rehearsal time is two 40-minute sessions before the internal deadline. The melody is in concert D minor and spans D4–D5. Luca’s draft has these faults: the clarinet is written a major second higher than sounding, so a written C5 sounds B-flat 4; flute and violin double the melody at the octave throughout; the piano left hand doubles the cello in parallel octaves in bars 5–8; every part is marked f from bar 1; the phrase lengths are 5+5+6 instead of the model’s 4+4+8; and the cello’s lowest note is C2, below the player’s comfortable range. The brief says the arrangement must remain recognisable and must include one contrasting accompaniment texture. Luca has 10 days and can revise notation but cannot change instruments.
1. Identify the three most damaging issues in the draft and explain how each affects either the players or the listener’s ability to recognise the melody.
Read the worked answer
Most damaging is the clarinet transposition. A written C5 sounding B-flat 4 puts the clarinet a tone below the flute and violin, creating a clash against D minor and placing the melody in the wrong register. The player may also be given a part that does not match the intended line, so rehearsal time is wasted. Second is the parallel octaves between piano left hand and cello in bars 5–8: at Grade 3–4, players will hear the doubling as thick and out of tune, and octave parallels weaken the independence of the bass. The fix is to give the piano left hand a simpler root–fifth pattern or rests. Third is the unbroken f marking: without dynamic contrast the arrangement loses the brief’s contrasting accompaniment texture and the melody cannot be distinguished when flute and violin double it. The cello C2 is a range problem but can be solved by octave displacement. The 5+5+6 phrasing is a structural weakness, but it does not stop recognition as directly as the transposition and texture. If only three fixes are possible, fix transposition, octave doubling and dynamics.
2. Propose a revised two-bar accompaniment for bars 5–8 that respects the players’ levels and fixes the parallel octaves. Describe it in words with specific note names or rhythms.
Read the worked answer
Use a two-layer bass. Let the cello play a stepwise line in half notes: D–E–F–G over bars 5–8, staying within a fifth and using no position shift above first position. Let the piano left hand play sustained roots on beat 1 only: D, B-flat, G, A, each as a minim, with no octave doubling of the cello. The piano right hand can add a light off-beat chord on beats 2 and 4, but only at mp. This removes the parallel octaves because the piano and cello no longer move in the same octave; it also gives the texture contrast the brief asks for. The cello line is playable by a Grade 3–4 cellist because the intervals are stepwise or minor thirds, and the piano part is simple enough to rehearse in two 40-minute sessions. If the cellist cannot manage the stepwise line, reduce it to repeated roots D–D–G–G and let the piano take the movement.
3. Decide whether to keep the flute/violin octave doubling or replace it with a countermelody. Justify with balance, rehearsal time and recognisability.
Read the worked answer
Keep the octave doubling in the first and last phrases, but replace it in bars 5–8 with a simple countermelody. The melody must stay recognisable for a school audience and for the brief, and Grade 3–4 players need a clear lead. A full countermelody for both flute and violin would be unrealistic in two 40-minute rehearsals, but a four-bar countermelody for violin alone can be rehearsed separately while the flute holds the tune. This also solves the f-everywhere problem: flute and violin can be mf, the countermelody mp, and piano and cello p. If the octave doubling is kept throughout, intonation at Grade 3–4 may make the melody sound sharp or hollow. If the players cannot tune the octave, drop the violin to unison rather than risk a bad octave. The decision is therefore selective doubling, not a complete rewrite.