MT Pesticide Applicator study materials
MT Pesticide Applicator study resources

Horn Fly Control in a Cow-Calf Herd

MT Pesticide Applicator · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Horn Fly Control in a Cow-Calf Herd

A 180-head cow-calf herd grazes 240 acres. On July 15, counts on 20 cows average 300 horn flies per side, and the cows are bunching and tail-switching. The producer has used pyrethroid ear tags every May for 5 years, plus a pyrethroid pour-on in midsummer. This year's tags went on 10 weeks ago. Dung beetle activity in pats has declined noticeably. The producer wants to add another pyrethroid pour-on now. Calves are scheduled for sale in 30 days, and the pour-on label states a 45-day meat withdrawal.

1. Is treatment justified at 300 flies per side, and is the current tag program working?

Read the worked answer

Treatment is justified, because the economic threshold for horn flies is roughly 200 per side, and 300 per side with bunching behavior means production loss is likely.

The program is probably failing, however. Five consecutive years of pyrethroid tags plus a pyrethroid pour-on is textbook selection pressure for pyrethroid resistance. Before adding more product, check:

  • Are the tags still intact and correctly placed, or worn out at 10 weeks?
  • Are flies distributed on the cows or concentrated on a few animals?
  • Has efficacy dropped compared with earlier years?

A resistant population will not be fixed by stacking a second pyrethroid. The right move is to switch insecticide class, not to add another application of the same class.

2. Calves are due to be sold in 30 days and the pour-on has a 45-day meat withdrawal. What do you recommend for the herd?

Read the worked answer

The 45-day withdrawal makes that pour-on illegal to use on calves that will be sold in 30 days. Options:

  1. Choose a product with a withdrawal of 30 days or less and confirm it is labeled for the class of cattle being treated.
  2. Use a non-chemical or mechanical approach for the calf crop - pasture rotation, fly traps, and timing - while treating only animals that will remain past the withdrawal date.
  3. Delay the sale if the effective product is the only practical option and the economics justify it.

Do not split the difference by using the product off-label or assuming the withdrawal does not apply to nursing calves. If cows are treated, check whether the label restricts use in lactating animals and whether calf exposure through milk matters for the marketing class. Document the withdrawal date and communicate it to the seller in writing.

3. Build a season-long control plan that addresses resistance and the dung beetle decline.

Read the worked answer
  • Rotate classes annually. Move away from pyrethroids to a different labeled class (for example an organophosphate or a different chemistry) and avoid using the same class in tags and pour-ons in the same year.
  • Time treatments to the fly season, not to a fixed May date, and remove tags at the end of the label's effective period.
  • Protect dung fauna. Avoid whole-herd pour-ons and feed-through products that persist in manure; use them only when counts justify it, and leave untreated animals as refugia.
  • Add non-chemical tactics: fly traps, pasture harrowing and rotation, and conserving beneficial insects.
  • Monitor counts every 1 to 2 weeks on a fixed sample of 15 to 20 cows, and rotate or stop when counts fall below threshold.
  • Record product, class, date, withdrawal period, and counts to detect resistance early next season.