Start-Time Briefing: Two Sources, Two Questions
A school council must vote on a proposal to move high school start times from 7:30 to 8:15. Members receive two documents. Source A is a one-page memo from the district transportation director. It states that later starts would require 12 additional buses and $480,000 more per year, based on routing software that modeled all 14 schools and current bell schedules; it includes three assumptions and notes that the estimate has a ±8% margin. Source B is a flyer from a community advocacy group. It says, 'Later start times improve grades and safety for all students,' cites a national sleep-science summary, and reports that 45 of 50 students surveyed at one high school support the change. The flyer does not describe how students were selected or how grades and safety were measured. A council member asks which document is more credible for deciding the budget question and what else is needed before voting.
1. Which source is more credible for the budget question, and why? Distinguish credibility for cost from credibility for student outcomes.
Read the worked answer
Source A is more credible for the budget question. It comes from the office responsible for routing, models all 14 schools and current bell schedules, lists its assumptions, and reports a ±8% margin. That does not make the estimate perfect, but it is specific, auditable, and within the decision's scope. Source B is more credible as evidence of community interest, not cost: a flyer from an advocacy group is not a neutral cost analysis, and 45 of 50 students at one school is a small, likely self-selected sample. The flyer also asserts that later starts improve grades and safety for 'all students' without describing measures. For the budget vote, use Source A's estimate; for student outcomes, treat Source B as a claim to verify with district data, not as proof.
2. Identify two questions the council should ask before voting and explain how each could change the decision.
Read the worked answer
First, ask whether the $480,000 estimate includes offsets such as reduced tardiness, changed athletic schedules, or state transportation reimbursements. If offsets are large, the net cost could fall enough to change the vote. Second, ask whether the 45-of-50 student survey is representative and whether the district has its own data on grades, attendance, and safety incidents by start time. If a representative survey shows broad support and local data show better outcomes, the case strengthens; if not, the council should not cite the flyer as evidence. A third question would be whether the ±8% margin and driver availability make the 12-bus estimate reliable. Each question tests a different assumption behind the proposal.
3. Write a one-sentence recommendation that uses both sources without overstating either.
Read the worked answer
Recommendation: 'Direct staff to verify the transportation director's $480,000 estimate and its assumptions, and to gather representative student-outcome data before deciding whether to move start times, while noting that the advocacy group's flyer shows community interest but does not establish effectiveness.'
The sentence uses Source A for a concrete cost claim and Source B only for the existence of community interest. It avoids saying the flyer proves benefits or that the cost estimate is final. It also gives the council a next step rather than forcing a yes-or-no vote on incomplete evidence.