High School Dyslexia: Accommodations, Assistive Technology, and Self-Advocacy
A 10th-grade student, Daniel, has a documented specific learning disability in reading. He reads grade-level text accurately but slowly: oral reading fluency is at the 10th percentile, comprehension at the 55th percentile when given extra time, and 25th percentile without extra time. He is preparing for statewide assessments and college entrance exams. His IEP includes extended time and a reader for tests, but he wants to read independently. He uses text-to-speech on a personal device, but the school's assistive technology review has not been updated. His teachers report that he does not use available audiobooks because “it feels like cheating.” The team meets to update his transition plan. The reading specialist must balance access, accommodation, and remediation.
1. What is the rationale for continuing fluency remediation in high school while also providing accommodations? How would you explain this to Daniel and his family?
Read the worked answer
Accommodations and remediation serve different purposes. Accommodations remove barriers to grade-level content and assessment; remediation builds the skills Daniel still needs for independence. His data show that his accuracy is adequate but his rate is very slow, and his comprehension drops sharply without extra time. That pattern means he can understand complex text when given access, but reading endurance and fluency remain genuine needs. Dropping remediation because he has accommodations would leave him dependent and would not address the transition to college and work.
For Daniel and his family, I would explain it this way: using text-to-speech or extended time is not cheating; it is a way to access the same content while he continues to strengthen his reading. I would also be honest that high-school fluency work should look different from elementary drills. It should use age-respectful materials, morphological analysis, repeated reading of content-area passages, and self-monitoring of rate and comprehension. We would set a measurable goal and review it each grading period. The message is that accommodations and skill-building are complementary, not competing.
2. Recommend a set of assessment accommodations and assistive technology supports for Daniel, and explain how you would evaluate their effectiveness.
Read the worked answer
I would recommend accommodations based on Daniel's documented access needs and the rules of each assessment: extended time, a separate setting, breaks, text-to-speech or a human reader where permitted, and a word processor with spellcheck for writing tasks. For statewide and college entrance exams, the team must follow the specific allowable-accommodations policies; an accommodation that is not permitted may still be appropriate for classroom assessment. Assistive technology should include text-to-speech for digital text, audiobooks with human narration, OCR for scanned materials, and note-taking support.
Effectiveness should be evaluated with data, not preference alone. I would trial each support for several weeks and track reading completion time, comprehension scores, usage frequency, and Daniel's self-report of fatigue and stress. I would also check whether he can use the tool independently and whether it is available on the actual testing platform. Finally, I would include self-advocacy training so Daniel can request and explain his accommodations in college. The goal is a defensible, student-centered system that preserves access while building independence.