MTTC Reading (005) study materials
MTTC Reading (005) study resources

MTTC Reading (005) study plan

MTTC Reading (005) · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Reading

  • Map the MTTC Reading (005) subareas against your current knowledge by writing a one-page self-audit that rates your confidence (1-5) on phonological and phonemic awareness, phonics and word analysis, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and assessment.

  • Define and correctly distinguish phonemic awareness from phonics in writing, giving three classroom examples of each and one example that is commonly mislabeled.

  • Segment, blend, delete, and substitute phonemes in 15 practice words (including digraphs, blends, and r-controlled vowels), recording each response and checking accuracy.

  • Classify the six syllable types and apply them to 25 multisyllabic words, marking the division point and the vowel sound in each.

  • Build a personal glossary of 20 core reading terms (e.g., phoneme, grapheme, morpheme, onset-rime, orthographic mapping) with a one-sentence definition and an instructional example for each.

Your checkpoint

A completed one-page self-audit plus a scored 15-word phonemic awareness and 25-word syllable-division worksheet, with errors annotated and corrected.

Week 2

Reading

  • Explain the alphabetic principle and the continuum from phonemic awareness to phonics to orthographic mapping, writing a 200-word summary without notes.

  • Identify and correct errors in 20 teacher-written phonics generalizations (e.g., silent-e, vowel teams, soft c and g, doubling rule, y as a vowel), noting at least two common exceptions to each.

  • Analyze 10 invented or authentic student spelling errors and name the underlying phonics or orthographic misconception each reveals.

  • Sequence phonics instruction for a K-2 progression, ordering 12 skills from easiest to most complex and justifying three placement decisions.

Your checkpoint

A 12-item ordered phonics scope-and-sequence with written rationales, plus a 10-item error-analysis table linking each misspelling to a specific misconception and instructional next step.

Week 3

Reading

  • Define fluency as accuracy, automaticity, and prosody, and explain in writing why each component matters for comprehension.

  • Calculate words correct per minute (WCPM) and accuracy percentage from three provided running-record scenarios, then classify each reader as at risk, emerging, or proficient relative to grade-level benchmarks you look up and cite.

  • Describe three evidence-based fluency routines (e.g., repeated reading, paired reading, performance reading) and state the grade band and materials each suits.

  • Distinguish fluency problems caused by word-recognition deficits from those caused by comprehension or attention issues, using three short reader profiles.

  • Explain the role of prosody in meaning-making and identify two observable prosody indicators you would listen for.

Your checkpoint

Three scored running records (WCPM, accuracy, and prosody rating), each with a written instructional recommendation matched to the reader's specific fluency profile.

Week 4

Reading

  • Differentiate implicit and explicit vocabulary instruction and classify 10 instructional activities accordingly.

  • Apply morphological analysis to 15 unfamiliar words, identifying prefixes, roots, and suffixes and predicting meaning from the parts.

  • Select and justify Tier 2 words from a short grade-level passage, explaining why each is more instructionally valuable than surrounding Tier 1 or Tier 3 words.

  • Design a 5-day vocabulary routine that includes context clues, morphology, and multiple exposures, and state how you would assess retention.

  • Explain how breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge each contribute to comprehension, citing at least two instructional implications.

Your checkpoint

A 5-day vocabulary lesson plan for a chosen passage, including five Tier 2 words, a morphological analysis, and a post-test item set of five questions.

Week 5

Reading

  • Distinguish literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension questions and write three of each for a single short passage.

  • Explain how narrative and expository text structures (e.g., story grammar, compare-contrast, cause-effect, problem-solution) support comprehension, and diagram two passages using their structures.

  • Model a think-aloud for one comprehension strategy (e.g., questioning, summarizing, monitoring), scripting at least eight teacher statements that make the invisible reasoning visible.

  • Describe the gradual release of responsibility (modeling, guided practice, independent application) and map three comprehension strategies onto it.

  • Identify what a reader's retelling reveals about comprehension and write a three-level rubric for scoring a retelling.

Your checkpoint

A comprehension question set (three literal, three inferential, three evaluative) for one passage, plus a scripted think-aloud and a three-level retelling rubric.

Week 6

Reading

  • Distinguish screening, diagnostic, progress-monitoring, and outcome assessments and match four sample instruments to their correct purpose.

  • Interpret a provided data set (e.g., a class set of oral reading fluency scores and a phonics inventory) to group students into three flexible instructional groups with stated criteria.

  • Explain the difference between norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measures and state one appropriate use for each.

  • Describe how to use assessment data to inform instruction without over-identifying students, naming two safeguards against misclassification.

  • Compare at least three evidence-based interventions for struggling readers and state the reader profile each best serves.

Your checkpoint

A data-interpretation write-up that groups a 20-student class into three flexible groups, names the assessment evidence used, and assigns one targeted intervention to each group.

Week 7

Reading

  • Integrate the five essential components of reading instruction into a single 90-minute balanced literacy block, allocating minutes and justifying each allocation.

  • Explain how to support English learners and students with dyslexia or other reading disabilities within each component, naming two specific accommodations per component.

  • Distinguish the major approaches to reading instruction (systematic explicit phonics, whole language, balanced literacy) and state the evidence base and limitations of each.

  • Analyze three short classroom scenarios and identify the instructional decision that most likely impedes student reading growth, justifying each with research-based reasoning.

  • Review your weeks 1-6 self-audit and errors, and re-rate your confidence on each subarea, flagging the two weakest for targeted review.

Your checkpoint

A 90-minute balanced literacy block plan with minute allocations, differentiation notes for two learner profiles, and an updated confidence re-rating with two flagged weak areas.

Week 8

Reading

  • Take two full-length timed practice tests under exam conditions and record raw scores by subarea.

  • Analyze every missed or guessed item, labeling the cause as content gap, misread question, or distractor trap, and write a corrective note for each.

  • Re-teach your two flagged weak areas from week 7 by writing a one-page summary of each from memory and checking it against your notes.

  • Build a one-page formula and terminology sheet you can review in the final 48 hours before the test.

  • Draft a test-day plan covering pacing per item, when to flag and return, and how to handle items you cannot answer.

Your checkpoint

Two scored practice tests with a full error log, a one-page terminology sheet, and a written test-day pacing plan.

Milestones

Week 2: Score at least 85% on the phonics scope-and-sequence and error-analysis tasks, and explain the alphabetic principle in writing without notes.

Week 4: Correctly score all three running records (WCPM and accuracy within 2 points) and classify each reader's fluency profile with a justified recommendation.

Week 6: Interpret the 20-student data set into three defensible flexible groups and match each group to an evidence-based intervention with a stated rationale.

Week 8: Achieve at least 80% on both timed practice tests overall and at least 75% in every subarea, with every missed item logged and corrected.