The Shrinking Tracksuit: A Seamstress, a School, and a Withheld Payment
A seamstress running a one-woman workroom took an order for 60 school tracksuits from a primary school's parent association. She bought 90 m of a 65% polyester / 35% cotton brushed-back fleece at a good price, cut the order over four days, and sewed the seams on an overlocker with polyester thread. The fabric was not washed before cutting. The school washed all 60 suits together at 60 °C and tumble-dried them on high before the first sports day. Within a fortnight the association reported that trouser legs had shortened by about 4 cm, the crotch seams on 11 suits were grinning, and the surface had pilled badly. The association is withholding the final 30% payment and asking for replacements. The seamstress points out that the care label she attached said 40 °C, wash inside out, and that the school ignored it.
1. Diagnose the likely cause of each of the three complaints, assigning responsibility to fabric, construction, or care where the evidence supports it.
Read the worked answer
Shrinkage (~4 cm on a leg of roughly 65–70 cm, so about 6%). A cotton/polyester blend shrinks mainly through the cotton component, and the fabric was not pre-washed or shrunk before cutting. Heat and tumble drying accelerate it. Responsibility is shared: the care label was correct, but a maker cutting 60 garments should have pre-shrunk a sample or chosen a pre-shrunk fleece and cut with allowance. The 60 °C wash and high tumble dry were outside the label and are the immediate trigger.
Crotch seam grin on 11 of 60. This is a construction problem, not a care problem. Grinning means the seam allowance is too narrow or the stitch is too loose for the load at a high-stress point, and on a brushed-back knit the overlocker needs correct differential feed and adequate seam width. An overlocked seam with insufficient allowance will fail under squatting and washing regardless of temperature. This one sits with the maker.
Pilling. Brushed-back fleece pills by design under abrasion; polyester contributes pills that do not break away. Hot washing and tumble drying increase surface abrasion and fibre migration. Largely a care and fabric-selection issue - but the maker chose the fabric, so she owns part of it.
Summary: the seam failure is squarely a making defect; shrinkage and pilling are mainly care-driven with a shared fabric-preparation responsibility.
2. How would you advise the two parties to settle the withheld payment and the demand for replacements?
Read the worked answer
Separate the complaints, because a blanket refusal or a blanket refund will both be unfair and neither will hold up if the dispute escalates.
Seams (11 suits). The maker should repair these at no charge - re-stitch with a wider seam allowance, correct differential feed, and a stitch density suited to knitwear. This is a straightforward making defect; refusing it damages her position on everything else.
Shrinkage and pilling (all 60). The care label said 40 °C, wash inside out, and the school washed at 60 °C and tumble-dried on high. A consumer who ignores a care label takes on the consequence, so the claim for 60 replacement suits is not supportable. But the maker was not blameless: she did not pre-shrink or warn in writing that the fleece would shrink if treated roughly, and a professional supplying 60 garments to an organisation should give care instructions at handover, not only on a sewn-in label.
A workable settlement: release the withheld 30% minus an agreed deduction covering the cost of the 11 repairs if the maker does them, or minus a small goodwill credit if the school arranges repairs locally. The maker repairs the 11, provides a written care sheet for all 60, and offers a modest credit on a repeat order. Document the agreement in writing, including that the 60 °C wash and tumble dry were outside specification.
Why not simply refund: the school's own handling caused most of the visible shrinkage; a full refund would make the maker pay for a decision she did not make and would not be the outcome a small-claims process would likely reach.
3. The association wants to reorder next year. What changes to specification and process would you recommend, and why?
Read the worked answer
Fabric. Specify a pre-shrunk or low-shrink fleece and state a maximum shrinkage figure (commonly 3% or less) in the order. Ask the supplier for shrinkage data before cutting; if it is not available, wash and dry a one-metre sample and measure it. That test costs a metre and a morning and would have prevented this dispute.
Construction. Widen the crotch and seat seam allowances and set the overlocker for knit fabric - correct differential feed, balanced tension, stitch density appropriate to the fleece. Bar-tack or reinforce high-stress points. Use a thread with adequate extensibility so the seam moves with the fabric.
Sizing. Cut with the measured shrinkage allowance built into leg and body length, and label the finished, post-wash size, not the cut size.
Communication. Supply a written care sheet with every order: 40 °C, inside out, no tumble drying, no fabric conditioner. Have the association sign an order confirmation that includes the care terms. This protects both sides and gives the school something to circulate to parents.
Sampling. Produce one sealed sample garment, agreed and signed before bulk cutting, and keep a duplicate. If a dispute arises, both parties compare against a common reference.
Business point. Cutting 60 garments over four days without a pre-production sample is the underlying process failure. The sample stage is the cheapest quality control a one-person workroom has.