Fleet Non-Disclosure: Young Driver and Courier Work
Greenline Logistics insured eight light goods vehicles under a commercial fleet policy. The proposal stated: 'Carriage of own goods only; no hire or reward; all drivers aged 25 or over with no more than three penalty points.' Premium was £18,400. In September the owner, Marek, allowed his nephew, Kacper (22), to drive van 4 while his regular driver was ill. Kacper had held a licence for 11 months and had six points for careless driving. Marek also began using van 7 three days a week to deliver parcels for an online retailer, charging £0.45 per mile. On 2 October Kacper ran a red light and hit a car, injuring the driver. Van 4 was written off (£9,500) and the third-party claim is estimated at £45,000. The insurer discovered the position from the retailer's invoices and the driver's licence check.
1. Can the insurer decline the own-damage claim for van 4? Explain the underwriting and policy issues.
Read the worked answer
The insurer has strong grounds to decline the van 4 own-damage claim, but must analyse the two issues separately. First, the proposal stated all drivers aged 25 or over with no more than three points. Kacper was 22, had held a licence for 11 months and had six points. That is a material change and likely a breach of a policy condition or warranty. Second, Marek allowed a 22-year-old with limited experience to drive, increasing the risk. The insurer can decline own damage if the policy was induced by the inaccurate proposal or if a condition was breached. However, it must check whether the condition is a warranty, a condition precedent, or merely a rating factor. If the policy is a fleet policy with an 'any driver' extension, the age declaration may still be a rating basis. The insurer should also consider whether the red-light collision was caused by the non-disclosure; for a breach of warranty, causation may not be required, but for a proportionate remedy it may matter.
2. What is the insurer's position on the injured third party's £45,000 claim?
Read the worked answer
The injured driver's £45,000 claim is a compulsory third-party liability. The insurer must not leave the injured party to pursue an uninsured driver if the law requires the insurer to satisfy the judgment. Even if the policy is avoided or the driver is not covered, the insurer may have to pay the third-party judgment and then recover from Marek and/or Kacper. The same applies to the courier use of van 7 if it is material to the claim. The insurer should investigate promptly, admit or deny liability on the evidence, and keep the third party informed. It should not use the policy dispute as a reason to delay medical treatment or interim payments. Recovery should be pursued after payment, with notice and a clear explanation. If another policy covers Kacper, contribution should be sought.
3. What rating and underwriting action should follow at renewal?
Read the worked answer
At renewal the fleet should be re-rated for: the true vehicle use, including courier work and any hire or reward; driver ages, experience and convictions; the claims record; annual mileage; and the goods carried. The insurer may impose conditions such as named-driver lists, telematics, driver licence checks every six months, minimum age 25, and no hire or reward without endorsement. It should issue an updated schedule and premium, and consider cancellation if the risk is no longer acceptable. The insurer should document the material facts and the consequences of non-disclosure. For the current policy, it should calculate additional premium or a reduced return premium depending on the remedy. The broker should be told so the client understands the cost of the changed risk.