BOVAEP Estate Agent TPC study materials
BOVAEP Estate Agent TPC study resources

A Leasehold Shop-Office Held Up by State Consent, a Contractor's Caveat and an Undischarged Charge

BOVAEP Estate Agent TPC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A Leasehold Shop-Office Held Up by State Consent, a Contractor's Caveat and an Undischarged Charge

Syarikat Maju Sdn Bhd agrees to buy a three-storey shop-office in Ipoh for RM4.2 million. The land is a 99-year leasehold (state lease) expiring in 2043, registered in the name of the seller, a family-owned Sdn Bhd. The title carries a restriction in interest requiring the consent of the State Authority for any transfer, and the seller is a Bumiputera company while the buyer is not. The property is charged to a local bank to secure an outstanding RM2.4 million facility; the bank has not yet agreed to discharge. A contractor has lodged a private caveat, claiming RM380,000 unpaid for renovation works completed eight months ago. The ground floor is let to a tenant for three years under a tenancy that was never registered or stamped. The buyer has paid 10% (RM420,000), and the sale and purchase agreement provides for completion within three months, failing which interest of 8% per annum runs against the defaulting party.

1. Can the transaction realistically complete within three months? Advise on the consent requirement and on how risk should be allocated in the SPA.

Read the worked answer

Three months is optimistic, and the SPA must be read as a whole.

Restriction in interest. The endorsement means the transfer cannot be registered without the State Authority's consent. The application is made through the land office with the instrument of transfer, the SPA, company documents and the prescribed fee. Processing commonly takes three to six months, and there is no deemed approval if the authority does not respond. The completion date is therefore likely to be missed through no fault of either party, and the 8% per annum default interest will be triggered unless the SPA deals with it.

Risk allocation. The SPA should make completion conditional on consent, provide for automatic extension, fix a long-stop date, and allow termination with a full refund of the 10% if consent is refused or not obtained within, say, six months. If the SPA is silent, the buyer carries the risk and should negotiate a supplemental letter now, while the deposit is still protected.

Bumiputera transfer. A transfer from a Bumiputera company to a non-Bumiputera buyer may also require approval under the Bumiputera lot conditions. Refusal is a real possibility and not a formality, so the buyer should obtain a written indication before committing further funds.

Practical step. Lodge the application immediately, diarise weekly, and serve a written notice reserving rights. Do not allow early possession, because the buyer would then occupy a property still subject to the seller's charge.

2. Explain the effect of the contractor's private caveat, the options for removing it, and what protection the buyer should put in place.

Read the worked answer

Effect. A private caveat under the National Land Code binds the Registrar and prevents registration of any dealing, including the transfer to Syarikat Maju, until it is removed or lapses. The sale cannot complete with the caveat in place, and no consent order will save it.

Removal options.

  • Withdrawal by the caveator (Form 19C), typically against payment or a negotiated settlement of the RM380,000 claim.
  • Application to the Registrar to remove the caveat on the ground that it was lodged without reasonable cause.
  • Court order: the proprietor or a person with a registered or registrable interest may apply to court; the caveator must then prove a caveatable interest, and damages may be awarded if the caveat was lodged without reasonable cause.
  • Lapse after six years without extension, which is no comfort on a three-month timetable.

Does the contractor have a caveatable interest? A claim for construction work is a money claim. A lien over land arises only if the contract or a statute creates a charge over the land. The renovation contract may create no interest in land at all, which makes the caveat vulnerable, but litigation is slow and the buyer should not assume a quick win.

Buyer protection. Lodge the buyer's own caveat as purchaser under the SPA, which is a recognised caveatable interest, and require the seller to procure removal of the contractor's caveat as a condition precedent to completion. Retain part of the price in escrow if early removal is not achievable, and make time for removal a condition rather than a promise.

3. Advise on the existing bank charge and on the unstamped three-year tenancy, including what the buyer must obtain before completion.

Read the worked answer

The charge. The property is charged to secure RM2.4 million, and a charge is not extinguished by sale. It remains on the register until a discharge is presented and registered. The sequence should be: obtain the bank's written redemption figure and an undertaking to discharge within a stated period against payment; pay from completion money directly to the chargee bank; and ensure the discharge is presented so that the charge is removed at or before registration of the transfer. With a RM4.2 million price against a RM2.4 million facility, there is ample cover, so the risk is procedural delay rather than shortfall. The SPA should authorise the buyer's financier to release funds directly to the seller's chargee.

The tenancy. A three-year tenancy does not require registration under the National Land Code, because leases not exceeding three years are exempt; the absence of registration is therefore not fatal. However, the tenancy must be stamped under the Stamp Act 1949 within 30 days of execution in Malaysia. An unstamped instrument is inadmissible in evidence and cannot be acted upon by a court or the Tribunal, which leaves the buyer unable to enforce rent or forfeit the deposit.

Before completion the buyer should obtain: a stamped copy of the tenancy, a statement of account showing rent and deposits, the tenant's written attornment confirming the terms and that no rent has been prepaid, and confirmation of the security deposit held. The property is bought subject to the tenancy, so any below-market rent is a pricing and valuation issue, not a title issue.